Strength Analysis of Composite Turbine Blades

  • Nicholas J. Pagano
  • Som R. Soni
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 34)


Turbine engine blades can be made in a laminate form of composite layers oriented in various directions. In this work we derive two approximate analytical models to describe the stress/strain field within each layer of a rotating turbine blade. At the foundation of the model is the fundamental observation that the very low width-to-thickness ratio precludes the use of the assumptions of classical lamination theory. Reasonable assumptions regarding the response distributions that are consistent with overall equilibrium lead to the appropriate analytical expressions. Strength predictions are made for three different blade architectures. one with orientations used by an existing design. the second prone to failure. and the third not prone to failure for a given angular velocity. The results show that an optimum blade architecture can be determined using these models. A comparison is made between the predicted results by an existing model and one of the present models by using effective material properties of the laminate. A computer code for IBM-PC computer has been written using these models for conducting the strength analysis of the turbine blade.


Turbine Blade Integration Point Strength Ratio Free Surface Boundary Condition Boundary Layer Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hopkins. D. A. Nonlinear Analysis of High Temperature Multi-L yer ed Fiber Composite Structures. TM-83754. NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland. Ohio ( 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reissner. E. and Y. Stayskv. “Bending and Stretching of Certain Types of Heterogeneous Aelotropic Elastic Plates.’ J. Applied Mechanics. 28: 402 (1961).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dong, S. B., K. S. Pister and R. L. Taylor. “On the Theory of Laminated Anisotropic Shells and Plates: J. Aero. Sci.. 28: 969 (1962).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pagano, N. J. and R. B. Pipes. “Some Observations on the Interlaminar Strength of Composite Laminates: hit. J. Mech. Sci., 15: 679 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pagano, N. J. and S. R. Soni. “Global Local Laminate Variational Model,” lot. J. Solids Structures, 19 (3): 207 (1983).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pagano. N. J. “Stress Fields in Composite Laminates: Int. J. Solids Structures. 14: 385 (1978).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, S. S. and I. Choi. “Boundary-Layer Effects in Composite Laminates: Part 2—Free-Edge Stress Solutions and Basic Characteristics: J. App(. Mechanics, 49: 549 (1982).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soni, S. R. and N. J. Pagano. “Elastic Response of Composite Laminates: Mechanics of Composite Materials. Pergamon Press, Zvi Hashin and Carl T. Herakovich, eds.. Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Composite Materials, VPISU, Blacksburg. Virginia. p. 227 (August 1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    PDA Engineering, personal communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas J. Pagano
    • 1
  • Som R. Soni
    • 2
  1. 1.AFWAL/MLBM Wright Patterson Air Force BaseUSA
  2. 2.Adtech Systems Research Inc.DaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations