Skip to main content

Some Convergences between Formal and Genetic Analyses

  • Chapter
  • 217 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 12))

Abstract

In this chapter I want to give one or two examples of the convergence between genetic and axiomatic investigations, since such examples can show how certain general results of formal analysis are psychologically explicable if based on what we know of the subject’s activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Gréco has further shown that between general non-conservation (the beginning of stage II) and conservation (stage III) there is an intermediate stage where the child expects to find the same number (in the case where visual correspondence is destroyed), but continues to deny that the quantity is the same. See ‘Quantité et quotité’, in Etudes épist. génét., vol. XIII, Etude 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Inhelder and Piaget, La genèse des structures logiques élémentaires,Neuchâtel—Paris, 1959, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Inhelder and Piaget, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See A. Morf, `Recherches sur l’origine de la connexité de la suite des nombres’, in Etudes épist. génét., Vol. XIII, Etude I I.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Gréco, toc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Grize, loc. cit.,p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. On the difficulties of logical reductionism in general, see S. Papert, `Sur le réductionnisme logique’, in Etudes épist. génét., Vol. XI, Etude I II.

    Google Scholar 

  8. We will say that we have interpreted the semantics of A in A if X being any proposition of Sem(A) and X’being the result obtained by replacing in X all the concepts of Sem(A) by their definition, X’ is true (or false) at the same time as X.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. W. Beth, The Foundations of Mathematics, Amsterdam, 1959, p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grundlagen der Mathematik,Berlin, 1939, Volume II, p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. B. Grize, Remarques sur les limitations des formalismes’, in Etudes épist. génét., Vol. XVI, pp. 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beth, E.W., Piaget, J. (1974). Some Convergences between Formal and Genetic Analyses. In: Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology. Synthese Library, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2193-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2193-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8328-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2193-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics