Skip to main content

Industrial Policies and the Community

  • Chapter
Main Economic Policy Areas of the EEC

Abstract

An entire generation of Europeans have lived through the unprecedented period of post-war prosperity. In the years between 1950 and 1972, growth averaged about 5% annually and unemployment stayed below 4%. Living standards surged, and world trade blossomed as never before. People came to consider as a “right” regular wage increases and to increasingly look to governments for a guarantee of the good life with a wide array of social programs (generous old-age pensions, broad medical coverage, education loans, unemployment insurance and so on).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnotes

  1. See L. Franko, Industrial policies in Western Europe. The World Economy, n°1, January 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See J. Sachs, Stabilization policies in the world economy. Amen,can Economic Review, May 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See M. Bruno, Raw materials, profits and the productivity slowdown. NBER Working Paper n°660R, Cambridge, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Lesourne, Industry and the next decade, in Inte’m ationaf Sympobium on Industnia.e Poticie Son the 80’s. The Spanish Ministry of Industry and Trade, Madrid, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an overall analysis, see Commission of the European Communities, Communitiesness or European Community Induathy. Document of the Commission’s Services, Brussels, 5 March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For the case of the United Kingdom see R. Bacon and W. Eltis, Bn agn’.o Economic Pnobfoe: Too Few Pnoducenh (London, McMillan, 1976). See also the very stimulating paper of A. Singh, U.K. industry and the world economy: a case of de-industrialisation ? in A. Jacquemin and H. de Jong, Wet(lane A6pe.c-toojIeduhtniaf Manlzet (Leiden, Nijhoff, 1977), who shows the role of the world market conditions. For a confirmation of Kaldor’s hypothesis that there is a close relationship between the rate of growth of a country’s GDP and the growth of its manufacturing sector, see T.F. Cripps and R.J. Tarling, Growth tin Advanced Cap.ttaftiat Ec000m2eb (London, Cambridge University Press, 1974), who have analysed the growth process in advanced industrial countries during 19501970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See for example R. Linda in Re.gutating the Behavioun of I Monopo and Dominant Undentahing1 Ln Community Law. Collège d’Europe (Bruges, de Tempel, 1977), p.62, where it is calculated that in 53% of the 301 European markets that were analysed the principal company controlled 40% of its national market.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a general analysis of these different aspects, see A. Jacquemin and H. de Jong, European IndLLSttyLaf Onganî atlon ( London, McMillan, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Stoleru, L’.Lmpénat-L! -Ledu.S.tAtel ( Paris, Seuil, 1969 ), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Toulemon and J. Flory, Une poít-.que LndwstA eLQe pout L’Eun.ope ( Paris, PUF, 1974 ), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Jacquemin, Econome. Liddy nTe22e euAopéenne (Paris, Dunod, 1979), p. 324; H. Bauwens in Cepess, PotLt-Lque Lndu,sVEiette (Bruxelles, 1974 ), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. de L’Estoile, Les objectifs actuels de la politique industrielle en France in PoT Lt-.que Lndubt,Le2Le et.6 tAatég-OI d’entnep!Lsee (Paris, Institut de l’Entreprise, Masson, 1977 ), pp. 124–125.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Meade, The Just Economy (London, Allen and Unwin, 1976), chap.VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a recent analysis, see D. Carlton, The disruptive effect of inflation on the organization of markets. Mimeo, NBER, Washington D.C., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. In the Theory of Games, this view is well-established for the case of the “prisoner’s dilemma”. In the well-known two-person nonzero-sum non-cooperative game which is ubiquitous in the economy, it is shown that, contrary to the doctrines of liberal economics, the group interest is not furthered by the independent pursuit of individual interests. The “Pareto-better” joint maximum position is forcibly repelled by the players because of the dominant character of their individual strategies. The situation is still more complex if the joint maximum position is not “Pareto-improving” because a player would worsen his position by such a change. Then the bigger utility total must be shared out by a suitable international distribution to make the players better off than they would have been.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See S. Holland, Europe’s new public enterprises in R. Vernon (ed), Big Business and the State, Changing Retaiion3 in Wehtenn Eunope ( London, McMillan, 1974 ), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Malinvaud, Les perspectives de la croissance française in CoLtoque bun Le nedépLoiement induoLnieL ( Paris, La Documentation Française, 1975 ), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For details, see The Fiiteen,th Genenat Repont on the Activities the European Communities. Brussels, 1982, pp.204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  19. EEC Commission, Pnognamme o4 the Commissioni on 1977 ( Brussels, February 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  20. EEC Commission, Sixth Reponi on Competition Poticy ( Brussels, April 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. EEC Commission, Tenth GenenaL Report on the Activities of the Community (Brussels, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  22. EEC Commission, Pnognamme o4 the Commission 4m the yeah 1977 (Brussels, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  23. EEC Commission, Foun,th Medium-tenor Economic Pnogkamme: Con cenning the Penrod 1976–1980. COM(76)530 Final (Brussels, 5 October 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Official Journal of the European Communities, n°L101,25, April 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Davignon, Ebauche d’une stratégie européenne pour surmonter la crise industrielle. Revue de. fa Société d’Etudes et d’Expand.on, n°273 (September 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Commission of the European Communities, A Community Stnafegy to Vevefop Eunope’a Ieduatty. COM(81)639 (Brussels, 23 October 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. This system enables any user with access to a suitable terminal linked to the telephone network to interrogate interconnected data bank. The tariff for the service is based not on distance but on interrogation time.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See W. Haeger, Industrial policy in an enlarged community in J. Girâo (ed), Soufhenn Europe and the Enfangemenf o the EEC. Economia, Lisboa, 1982; J.M. Jeanneney, Poun cc nouveau pnoteetfonisme ( Paris, Seuil, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  29. See B. Balassa, Prospects for trade in manufactured goods between industrial and developing countries, 1978–1990. Joutnaf o Poficy Modefd.ng, n°2, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacquemin, A. (1983). Industrial Policies and the Community. In: Coffey, P. (eds) Main Economic Policy Areas of the EEC. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2130-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2130-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-2132-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2130-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics