Skip to main content

Product development strategies for foods in the era of molecular biotechnology

  • Chapter
  • 1260 Accesses

Abstract

Breakthroughs in science and technology are accelerating development of new products that are impacting our regulatory systems. Genetically modified or bioengineering plant varieties have entered the food supply on a global basis, especially in the U.S. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates on the premise of ‘substantial equivalence’ and has developed premarket notification procedures and voluntary labeling guidelines. Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare regulates biotechnology products and has imposed biotechnology labeling regulations. However, the EU continues to be in a regulatory gridlock between member states and has proposed strict traceability and labeling guidelines. These requirements are currently restricting imports of bioengineered foods and are creating an international debate. In contrast to bioengineered plant varieties, to our knowledge, there are no strains of lactic acid bacterial starter cultures on the market that contain rDNA. The majority of strains have been improved via selection and mutagenesis. However, conjugation and electroporation have been used to transfer native lactococcal phage resistance plasmids to industrial strains. In addition, plasmids have been introduced to allow for selection of certain characteristics and then been eliminated by curing. The potential benefits of bioengineered foods are far reaching and are one of the most important opportunities of this century. However, bioengineered foods remain an emotional debate that is affecting world trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous (2000) JGI sequences ‘Supergerm’ genome in 1 day. http://jgi.doe.gov/News/news_5_9_00.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Barboza D (2000) Modified foods put companies in a quandary. http://www.biotech-info.net/quandry.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgian Biosafety Server (2001) Placing genetically modified foods (GM foods) on the EU Market. Regulation (EC) 258/97: placing GM foods on the market. http://www.biosafety.be/NF/GMfood/Gmfood_ma rket.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolotin A, Mauger S, Malarme K, Dusko Ehrlich S Sorokin A (1999) Low-redundancy sequencing of the entire Lactococcus lactis IL1403 genome. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76: 27–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM (1997) The Innovators Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2000) Facts on GMOs and GMMs. Memo/00/43, Brussels 13 July 2000. http://europa.en.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/press/ press63_en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2001) A proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and the council, concerning traceability and labeling of genetically modified organisms and traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Brussels, 25.7. 2001, COM (2001) 182 final, 2001/0180 (COD). http://europa.eu.int

    Google Scholar 

  • Curie M, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Renault P Nilsson D (1999) A general method for selection of a-acetolactate decarboxylasedeficient Lactococcus lactis mutants to improve diacetyl formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 1202–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickely F, Nilsson D, Hansen EB Johansen E (1995) Isolation of Lactococcus lactis nonsense suppressors and construction of a food-grade cloning vector. Molec. Microbiol. 15: 839–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environ- ment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal L 106, 17/04/2001 pp 0001–0039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emond É, Lavall E, Drolet G, Moineau S LaPointe G (2001) Molecular characterization of a theta replication plasmid and its use for development of a two-component food-grade cloning system for Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 1700–1709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer 52.1 (2000) The Europeans and Biotechnology. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/pdf/euro barometer-en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO/WHO (2000) Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation of foods derived from Biotechnology. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1992a) Food Additives. FDA/IFIC Brochure. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov—Ird/foodaddi.html

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1992b) Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties; notice. Food and Drug Administration. Fed. Reg. 57: 22984–23005.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1997a) Guidance on consultation procedures, foods derived from new plant varieties. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov October, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1997b) Substances generally recognized as safe. Food and Drug Administration Fed. Reg. 62: 18937–18964.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2001a) Guidanace for Industry: voluntary labeling indicating whether foods have or have not been developed using bioengineering. Draft guidance. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/—dms/biolabgu.html

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2001b) List of completed consultations on bioengineered foods. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Food Additive Safety, July 2001. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/—lyd/biocon.html

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2001c) Premarket notice concerning bioengineered foods. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Fed. Reg. 66: 4706–4738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldfeldt LU, Sorensen KI, Stroman P, Behrndt H, Williams D Johansen E (2001) Effect of starter cultures with a genetically modified peptidolytic or lytic system on Cheddar cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 11: 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFBC (1990) Biotechnologies and food: assuring the safety of food produced by genetic modification. International Food Biotechnology Council. Regulatory Toxicol Pharmacol. 12: Part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFIC (2001a) Agricultural biotechnology: myths facts. International Food Information Council, Food Safety Nutritional Information, IFIC Food Insight, October, 2001. http://ific.org

    Google Scholar 

  • IFIC (2001b) Most Americans can articulate expected benefits of food biotechnology. International Food Information Council, Food Safety Nutrition Information, IFIC Background, November, 2001. http://ific.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFT (2000) IFT expert report on biotechnology and foods. Labeling of rDNA biotechnology-derived foods. Food Technol. 54: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISAAA (2002) Global GM crop area continues to grow and exceeds 50 million hectares for first time in 2001. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. January 10, 2002. http://www.isaaa.org/press%2Orelease/Global%20Area Jan 2002.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen T, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Rasmussen P, Schnabl J Riisberg L (2002) Inactivation of the pip gene is the dominating mutation type for mutants from Lactocococus lactis resistant towards c2- like phages. Poster presentation at the Seventh Symposium on Lactic Acid Bacteria, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen E (1999) Genetic engineering (b) Modification of bacteria, In: Robinson R, Batt C Patel P (Eds) Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, Academic Press, London (pp 917–921 ).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joutsjoki V, Louoma S, Tamminen M, Kilpi M, Johansen E Palva A (2002) Recombinant Lactococcus starters as a potential source of additional peptidolytic activity in cheese ripening. J. Appl. Microbiol. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaenhammer TR (2002) Lactobacillus gassed genome project. http://j gi. doe. gov/JGI_microbial/html/l actobaci l lu s..gas_content.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson A (2002) Larson on trade liberalization, biotechnology and growth. The United States Mission to the European Union, Brussels, Belgium, January 8, 2002. http://www.useu.be/Categories/Biotech/Jan0802BiotechTrade LarsonEUe.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy AS Derby BM (2000) Report on Consumer Focus Groups on Biotechnology, Consumer Studies Team, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick C, Griffin H Gasson M (1995) Construction of a food-grade host/vector system for Lactococcus lactis based on the lactose operon. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 127: 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mierau I, Kunji E, Leenhouts K, Hellendoorn M, Haandrikman A, Poolman B, Konings W, Venema G Kok J (1996) Multiple-peptidase mutants of Lactococcus lactis are severely impaired in their ability to grow in milk. J. Bacteriol. 178: 2794–2803.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miraglia M, Onori R, Brera C Cava E (1998) Safety assessment of genetically modified food products: An evaluation of developed approaches and methodologies. Microchem. J. 59: 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCBI (2002) Microbial genomes. Completed and ongoing projects. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMGifs/Genomes/bact.html

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) Report of the task force for the safety of novel foods and feeds. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. 86/ADDA, May 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers News (2001) To the point: Rutgers’ Food Policy Institute report shows that Americans confused and undecided about biotechnology. http://njaes.rutgers.edu/www/news/pressreleases/2001/1115- biotechnology.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders ME, Leonhard PJ, Sing WE Klaenhammer TR (1986) Conjugal strategy for construction of fast acid-producing, bacteriophage-resistant lactic streptococci for use I dairy fermentations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52: 1001–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen K, Larsen R, Kibenich A, Junge M Johansen E (2000) A food-grade cloning system for industrial strains of Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 1253–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2001) Japan Biotechnology. Update of Japan’s Biotechnology Safety Approval and Labeling Policies 2001. Foreign Agricultural Service Global Agriculture Information Network Report. GAIN Report #JA1080, August 29, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright A, Wessels S, Tynkkynen S Saarela M (1990) Isolation of a replication region of a large lactococcal plasmid and use in cloning of a nisin resistance determinant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 2029–2035.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kondo, J.K., Johansen, E. (2002). Product development strategies for foods in the era of molecular biotechnology. In: Siezen, R.J., Kok, J., Abee, T., Schasfsma, G. (eds) Lactic Acid Bacteria: Genetics, Metabolism and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2029-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2029-8_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6141-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2029-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics