Abstract
Two important contemporary philosophical programs have revitalized Kant’s critique of practical reason. In the U.S. Rawls has developed his theory of justice as an explicit “Kantian Constructivism.” In Germany Habermas and Apel have launched two separate projects whose affinities override their differences and allow one to speak about a shared program. Habermas’ “Universal Pragmatics” and its derivative “Diskurs Ethik” and Apel’s “Transcendental Semiotics” (or “Transcendental Hermeneutics”) and its derivative “Minimal Ethics” are two versions of a new form of Kantian transcendentalism in general and of ethical formalism in particular. Ours is an age whose intellectual predicament seems to be a sophisticated, linguistically informed historicism and relativism; it is an age in which any attempt to utter a universal claim is immediately deconstructed and shown to be something other than what it purports to be; in such an age these two programs are to be admired. Nevertheless, and fashionably enough, I will try to undermine them, and not only because, having no belief in foundations, I rejoice in deconstructionist work, but also because I think the two programs are ill-founded. I will examine the continental program only, trying to reconstruct what seems to me its principal argument. The main concept that I will explicate and criticize here is that of the “ideal speech situation.” The focus on this concept — and the limited scope of this paper — is a rationale for the preliminary exclusion of Rawls from the present discussion. Rawls’s “original position” can be interpreted as a form of an ideal speech situation or be shown to imply one. If such an interpretation of Rawls is warranted and if my radical criticism of the concept of ideal speech situation is justified, then Rawls’s whole program cannot get off the ground.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Apel, Karl-Otto, 1963, Die Idee der Sprache in der Tradition des Humanismus von Dante bis Vico, Archive für Begriffsgeschichte, 8, Bonn.
Introduction to S. C. Peirce, Schriften I, Frankfurt.
Introduction to S. C. Peirce, Schriften II, Frankfurt.
Types of Social Science in the Light of Human Interests of Knowledge,“ Social Research 44, no. 3.
The Common Presuppositions of Hermeneutics and Ethics: Types of Rationality Beyond Science and Technology,“ in J. Barmark (ed.), Perspectives in Metascience, Gothenburg (Sweden).
Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, London ( Transformation der Philosophie, Frankfurt, 1972 ).
Normative Ethics and Strategical Rationality: The Philosophical Problem of a Political Ethics,“ The Third Hannah Arendt Memorial, New York.
The Situation of Humanity as an Ethical Problem,“ Praxis International.
Bourdieu, Pierre and J.-C. Passeron, 1977, Reproduction, Society and Culture,London.
Eco, Umberto, 1976, A Theory of Semiotics, Bloomington, Indiana.
Foucault, Michel, 1980, “The Order of Discourse,” in Robert Young, Untying the Text, New York ( L’Ordre du discours, Paris, 1971 ).
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1975, Truth and Method, New York (Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen, 1960 ).
Goldmann, Lucien, 1971, Immanuel Kant, London (Introduction à la philosophie de Kant, Paris, 1967 ).
Habermas, Jürgen, 1971, Knowledge and Human Interests, Boston (Erkenntniss und Interesse, Frankfurt, 1968 ).
Theory and Practice, Boston ( Theorie und Praxis, Frankfurt, 1971 ).
a, “A Postscript to Knowledge and Human Interests,” Philosophy of Social Science 3: 157–189.
Communication and the Evolution of Society, Boston.
Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns Vols. I & II, Frankfurt.
a, “The Dialectics of Rationalization,” an interview with Axel Honneth, Eberhard Knodler-Bunte, and Arno Widmann, Telos,no. 49.
Theory of Communicative Action,Boston (Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Vol. I).
Ingram, David, 1982, “The Possibility of a Communication Ethic Reconsidered:
Habermas, Gadamer, and Bourdieu on Discourse,“ Man and World 15: 149–161. Lorenzen, Paul, 1969, Normative Logic and Ethics,Mannheim/Zurich.
Ophir, Adi, 1986, “Plato’s Republic: Philosophy as a Serious Game” ( Hebrew ), Iyyun 35: 3–29.
Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Boston.
Thompson, J. B. & D. Held (eds.), 1982, Habermas: Critical Debates, Cambridge. Serres, Michel, 1983, Hermes: Literature, Science, Philosophy, Baltimore.
Yovel, Yirmiahu, 1980, Kant and the Philosophy of History, Princeton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ophir, A. (1989). The Ideal Speech Situation: Neo-Kantian Ethics in Habermas and Apel. In: Yovel, Y. (eds) Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées, vol 128. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2016-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2016-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4054-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2016-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive