Skip to main content

Island Constraints: An Introduction

  • Chapter
Island Constraints

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 15))

Abstract

Island constraints have formed a central component of grammatical theory since the ground breaking work of Ross (1967) developing a proposal in Chomsky (1964). The papers collected in this volume address island constraints from a variety of theoretical linguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives. They result from a conference held at the University of Ottawa during the fall of 1989, at which specialists from several fields met to engage in interdisciplinary dialogue over the nature and manifestations of island constraints. In this brief introduction, we will attempt to summarize the intellectual setting that serves as backdrop to the investigations reported on here. To do so both fully and briefly presents a difficult challenge. But we think the inevitable risk of misrepresentation and offense is worth the effort. For it is only by making results accessible outside their domains of specialization that we can hope to foster the cross-disciplinary dialogue that we believe so essential to the growth of our knowledge and understanding of the mechanisms of language.

We are grateful to Peter Culicover, Henry Davis, and Janet Fodor for helpful comments on an earlier draft. All errors that remain are our own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allwood, J.: 1976, `The complex NP constraint in Swedish’. UMASS Occasional Papers in Linguistics, volume II. Reprinted in Engdahl and Ejerhed 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, G.: 1988, `Ambiguity, parsing strategies and computational models’, Language and Cognitive Processes 3, 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L.-G.: 1982, `What is Swedish an exception to? Extractions and island constraints’, in Engdahl and Ejerhed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J., Hornstein, N., and Sportiche, D.: 1981, `Some aspects of wide scope quantification’, Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.: 1988, Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltin, M. and Kroch, A. (eds.): 1989, Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R. and Weinberg, A.: 1984, The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R. and Weinberg, A.: 1985, `Deterministic parsing and linguistic explanation’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. (ed.): 1982, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. and Mchombo, S.: 1987, `Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewa’, Language 63, 741–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. and Tanenhaus, M. (eds.): 1989, Linguistic Structure in Language Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, J. W.: 1985, `LF WH-Movement: a case of pied piping?’, unpublished ms., Univ. of Mass., Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1964, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1973, `Conditions on transformations’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dor-drecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. and McCloskey, J.: 1983, `On the interpretation of certain island facts in GPSG’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 704–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G.: 1990, Types of A-Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C. and Frazier, L.: 1989, `Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies’, in Tanenhaus and Carlson (eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S. and Fodor, J. D.: 1985a, `How can grammars help parsers?’, in D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S. and Fodor, J. D.: 1985b, `On the innateness of subjacency’, in G. Alvarez, B. Brodie, and T. McCoy (eds.), Proceedings of the First East Coast Conference on Linguistics, 191–204, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S. and Fodor, J. D.: 1987, `Sentence matching and overgeneration’, Cognition 26, 123–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S. and Steedman, M.: 1985, `On not being led up the garden path’, in Dowty, Karttunen, and Zwicky (eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenzi, M.: 1990, M.: 1990, `Filler-gap dependencies in a null-subject language: referential and non-referential WHs’, paper presented at the third CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villiers, J., Roeper, T., and A. Vainikka: 1990, `The acquisition of long-distance rules’, in L. Frazier and J. de Villiers (eds.), Language Acquisition and Language Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J.: 1967, `Noun phrase complementation in English and German’, unpublished paper, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D., Karttunen, L., and Zwicky, A. (eds.): 1985, Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computation and Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E.: 1986, Constituent Questions: The Syntax and Semantics of Questions with Special Reference to Swedish, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E. and Ejerhed, E.: 1982, Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages, Almqvist and Wiksel, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erteschik, N.: 1973, The Nature of Island Constraints, MTT, PhD dissertation, Cambridge, Mass. Published by IULC as Erteschik-Shir (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D.: 1983, `Phrase structure parsing and island constraints’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 163–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D.: 1985, `Deterministic parsing and subjacency’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K.: 1979, `Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor’, in W. E. Cooper and W. Walker (eds.), Sentence Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. and Stevenson, B.: 1987, `Sentence matching and well-formedness’, Cognition 26: 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. and Clifton, C.: 1989, `Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser’, Language and Cognitive Processes 4, 93–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. and Forster, K.: 1985, `The psychological status of overgenerated sentences’, Cognition 19, 101–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G.: 1981, `Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., and Sag, I.: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodluck, H.: 1990, `Knowledge integration in processing and acquisition: Comments on Grimshaw and Rosen’ in L. Frazier and J. de Villiers (eds.), Language Acquisition and Language Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, MIT PhD dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P. and Pullum G. (eds.): 1982, The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Bresnan, J.: 1982, `Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation’, in Bresnan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Zaenen, A.: 1989, `Long-distance dependencies, constituent structure, and functional uncertainty’, in Baltin and Kroch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D.: 1988, `Subjects’, unpublished ms., UCLA, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, S.: 1987, Functional Syntax, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H. and Saito, M.: 1984, `On the nature of proper government’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H. and Saito, M.: 1989, Move a, unpublished ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, J. and Zaenen, A.: 1982, A.: 1982, `A phrase structure account of Scandinavian extraction phenomena’, in Jacobson and Pullum 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J. and Swinney, D.: 1989, `The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, T.: 1986, Quantification in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Mass., Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsu, Y.: 1981, Towards a Theory of Syntactic Development, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D.: 1987, ` Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochemont, M.: 1989, `Topic islands and the subjacency parameter’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, R.: 1976, `Scope phenomena, “movement transformations”, and relative clauses’, in B. H. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, T.: 1986, `How children acquire bound variables’, in B. Lust (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, Vol. l: Defining the Constraints, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R.: 1967/1983, Constraints on Variables in Syntax,PhD dissertation, MIT, published as Infinite Syntax,Ablex Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.: 1981, `Consistency, markedness and language change: on the notion “consistent language” ’, Journal of Linguistics 17, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, L.: 1986, `Parsing wh-constructions: evidence for on-line gap location’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, L.: 1989, `Thematic structures and sentence comprehension’, in Carlson and Tanenhaus (eds).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1985, `Null antecedents and proper government’, in Proceedings of NELS 16, UMASS, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, G., Carlson, G., and Seidenberg, M.: 1985, Do listeners compute syntactic representations?’, in Dowty, Karttunen, and Zwicky (eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, G., Carlson, G., and Trueswell: 1989, `The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing’, Language and Cognitive Processes, special issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraldsen, K. T.: 1979, `The theoretical interpretation of a class of marked extractions’, GLOW paper, published in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.): 1981, The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, ScuoleNormale Superiore, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraldsen, K. T.: 1982. T.: 1982, `Extraction from relative clauses in Norwegian’, in Engdahl and Ejerhed 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R.: 1990, Adventures on Long Distance Moving: The Acquisition of ComplexWh-Questions,unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K. and Culicover, P.: 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, Cam-bridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. and Peters, A.: 1988, `What are you cookin’ on a hot?: Movement Con-straints in the speech of three year old blind children’, Language 64, 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, A.: 1980, Extraction Rules in Icelandic, PhD dissertation, MIT, published 1985, Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, A.: 1983, `On syntactic binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 469–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodluck, H., Rochemont, M. (1992). Island Constraints: An Introduction. In: Goodluck, H., Rochemont, M. (eds) Island Constraints. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1980-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1980-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4148-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1980-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics