Abstract
Island constraints have formed a central component of grammatical theory since the ground breaking work of Ross (1967) developing a proposal in Chomsky (1964). The papers collected in this volume address island constraints from a variety of theoretical linguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives. They result from a conference held at the University of Ottawa during the fall of 1989, at which specialists from several fields met to engage in interdisciplinary dialogue over the nature and manifestations of island constraints. In this brief introduction, we will attempt to summarize the intellectual setting that serves as backdrop to the investigations reported on here. To do so both fully and briefly presents a difficult challenge. But we think the inevitable risk of misrepresentation and offense is worth the effort. For it is only by making results accessible outside their domains of specialization that we can hope to foster the cross-disciplinary dialogue that we believe so essential to the growth of our knowledge and understanding of the mechanisms of language.
We are grateful to Peter Culicover, Henry Davis, and Janet Fodor for helpful comments on an earlier draft. All errors that remain are our own.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allwood, J.: 1976, `The complex NP constraint in Swedish’. UMASS Occasional Papers in Linguistics, volume II. Reprinted in Engdahl and Ejerhed 1982.
Altmann, G.: 1988, `Ambiguity, parsing strategies and computational models’, Language and Cognitive Processes 3, 73–97.
Andersson, L.-G.: 1982, `What is Swedish an exception to? Extractions and island constraints’, in Engdahl and Ejerhed.
Aoun, J., Hornstein, N., and Sportiche, D.: 1981, `Some aspects of wide scope quantification’, Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 69–95.
Baker, M.: 1988, Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Baltin, M. and Kroch, A. (eds.): 1989, Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Berwick, R. and Weinberg, A.: 1984, The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Berwick, R. and Weinberg, A.: 1985, `Deterministic parsing and linguistic explanation’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 109–134.
Bresnan, J. (ed.): 1982, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Bresnan, J. and Mchombo, S.: 1987, `Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewa’, Language 63, 741–782.
Carlson, G. and Tanenhaus, M. (eds.): 1989, Linguistic Structure in Language Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.
Choe, J. W.: 1985, `LF WH-Movement: a case of pied piping?’, unpublished ms., Univ. of Mass., Amherst.
Chomsky, N.: 1964, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Mouton, The Hague.
Chomsky, N.: 1973, `Conditions on transformations’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dor-drecht.
Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Chung, S. and McCloskey, J.: 1983, `On the interpretation of certain island facts in GPSG’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 704–713.
Cinque, G.: 1990, Types of A-Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Clifton, C. and Frazier, L.: 1989, `Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies’, in Tanenhaus and Carlson (eds.).
Crain, S. and Fodor, J. D.: 1985a, `How can grammars help parsers?’, in D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.).
Crain, S. and Fodor, J. D.: 1985b, `On the innateness of subjacency’, in G. Alvarez, B. Brodie, and T. McCoy (eds.), Proceedings of the First East Coast Conference on Linguistics, 191–204, Ohio State University.
Crain, S. and Fodor, J. D.: 1987, `Sentence matching and overgeneration’, Cognition 26, 123–169.
Crain, S. and Steedman, M.: 1985, `On not being led up the garden path’, in Dowty, Karttunen, and Zwicky (eds.).
Vincenzi, M.: 1990, M.: 1990, `Filler-gap dependencies in a null-subject language: referential and non-referential WHs’, paper presented at the third CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, March 1990.
Villiers, J., Roeper, T., and A. Vainikka: 1990, `The acquisition of long-distance rules’, in L. Frazier and J. de Villiers (eds.), Language Acquisition and Language Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.
Dean, J.: 1967, `Noun phrase complementation in English and German’, unpublished paper, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Dowty, D., Karttunen, L., and Zwicky, A. (eds.): 1985, Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computation and Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Engdahl, E.: 1986, Constituent Questions: The Syntax and Semantics of Questions with Special Reference to Swedish, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.
Engdahl, E. and Ejerhed, E.: 1982, Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages, Almqvist and Wiksel, Stockholm.
Erteschik, N.: 1973, The Nature of Island Constraints, MTT, PhD dissertation, Cambridge, Mass. Published by IULC as Erteschik-Shir (1977).
Fodor, J. D.: 1983, `Phrase structure parsing and island constraints’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 163–223.
Fodor, J. D.: 1985, `Deterministic parsing and subjacency’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 3–42.
Forster, K.: 1979, `Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor’, in W. E. Cooper and W. Walker (eds.), Sentence Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Forster, K. and Stevenson, B.: 1987, `Sentence matching and well-formedness’, Cognition 26: 171–186.
Frazier, L. and Clifton, C.: 1989, `Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser’, Language and Cognitive Processes 4, 93–126.
Freedman, S. and Forster, K.: 1985, `The psychological status of overgenerated sentences’, Cognition 19, 101–131.
Gazdar, G.: 1981, `Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155–184.
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., and Sag, I.: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Goodluck, H.: 1990, `Knowledge integration in processing and acquisition: Comments on Grimshaw and Rosen’ in L. Frazier and J. de Villiers (eds.), Language Acquisition and Language Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.
Huang, J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, MIT PhD dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.
Jacobson, P. and Pullum G. (eds.): 1982, The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.
Kaplan, R. and Bresnan, J.: 1982, `Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation’, in Bresnan.
Kaplan, R. and Zaenen, A.: 1989, `Long-distance dependencies, constituent structure, and functional uncertainty’, in Baltin and Kroch.
Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D.: 1988, `Subjects’, unpublished ms., UCLA, Los Angeles.
Kuno, S.: 1987, Functional Syntax, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M.: 1984, `On the nature of proper government’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–289.
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M.: 1989, Move a, unpublished ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Maling, J. and Zaenen, A.: 1982, A.: 1982, `A phrase structure account of Scandinavian extraction phenomena’, in Jacobson and Pullum 1982.
May, R.: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Nicol, J. and Swinney, D.: 1989, `The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 5–19.
Nishigauchi, T.: 1986, Quantification in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Mass., Amherst, Mass.
Otsu, Y.: 1981, Towards a Theory of Syntactic Development, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Mass.
Pesetsky, D.: 1987, ` Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rizzi, L.: 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland.
Rizzi, L.: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rochemont, M.: 1989, `Topic islands and the subjacency parameter’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34, 145–170.
Rodman, R.: 1976, `Scope phenomena, “movement transformations”, and relative clauses’, in B. H. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.
Roeper, T.: 1986, `How children acquire bound variables’, in B. Lust (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, Vol. l: Defining the Constraints, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.
Ross, J. R.: 1967/1983, Constraints on Variables in Syntax,PhD dissertation, MIT, published as Infinite Syntax,Ablex Publishing, New York.
Smith, N.: 1981, `Consistency, markedness and language change: on the notion “consistent language” ’, Journal of Linguistics 17, 39–54.
Stowe, L.: 1986, `Parsing wh-constructions: evidence for on-line gap location’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 227–245.
Stowe, L.: 1989, `Thematic structures and sentence comprehension’, in Carlson and Tanenhaus (eds).
Stowell, T.: 1985, `Null antecedents and proper government’, in Proceedings of NELS 16, UMASS, Amherst, Mass.
Tanenhaus, G., Carlson, G., and Seidenberg, M.: 1985, Do listeners compute syntactic representations?’, in Dowty, Karttunen, and Zwicky (eds.).
Tanenhaus, G., Carlson, G., and Trueswell: 1989, `The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing’, Language and Cognitive Processes, special issue.
Taraldsen, K. T.: 1979, `The theoretical interpretation of a class of marked extractions’, GLOW paper, published in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.): 1981, The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, ScuoleNormale Superiore, Pisa.
Taraldsen, K. T.: 1982. T.: 1982, `Extraction from relative clauses in Norwegian’, in Engdahl and Ejerhed 1982.
Thornton, R.: 1990, Adventures on Long Distance Moving: The Acquisition of ComplexWh-Questions,unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Wexler, K. and Culicover, P.: 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, Cam-bridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, B. and Peters, A.: 1988, `What are you cookin’ on a hot?: Movement Con-straints in the speech of three year old blind children’, Language 64, 249–273.
Zaenen, A.: 1980, Extraction Rules in Icelandic, PhD dissertation, MIT, published 1985, Garland, New York.
Zaenen, A.: 1983, `On syntactic binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 469–504.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodluck, H., Rochemont, M. (1992). Island Constraints: An Introduction. In: Goodluck, H., Rochemont, M. (eds) Island Constraints. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1980-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1980-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4148-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1980-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive