Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Norm Proposition” a Tentative Defense of a Sceptical View

  • Chapter
In Search of a New Humanism

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 282))

  • 198 Accesses

Abstract

The main concern of this paper is to provide a tentative defense of what might be labelled “a sceptical view” on the notion of norm proposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Aamio Aulis: “On Truth and Validity of Interpretative Statements in Legal Dogmatics”, Third part of A. A.mio, R. Alexy, A. Peczenik: “The Foundation of Legal Reasoning”, Rechtstheorie, 12, pp. 423–48. Alchourrón and Bulygin 1981

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alchourrón Carlos Eduardo and Bulygin Eugenio: Normative Systems. Springer-Verlag, Wien. Alchourrón and Bulygin 1971

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alchourrón Carlos Eduardo and Bulygin Eugenio: “Un modello per la dinamica dei sistemi normativi”, in A. Martino (ed.): Logica, informatica diritto, Le Monnier, Firenze, vol. I, pp. 133–43. Atienza 1978

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atienza Manuel: Sobre la analogia en el derecho. Ensayo de anhlisis de un razonamiento juridico, Civitas, Madrid. 1986

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bulygin Eugenio: “Time and Validity”, in A. Martino (ed.): Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, vol. II, pp. 65–81. Bulygin 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bulygin Eugenio: “Algunas consideraciones acerca de los sistema juridicos, Doxa,9, pp. 257–79. Bulygin 1991

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bulygin Eugenio: “Sull’interpretazione giuridica”, in P. Comanducci and R. Guatini (eds.): Analisi e diritto 1992. Ricerche di giurisprudenza analitica, Giappichelli, Torino, pp. 11–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bulygin Eugenio and Alchourrón Carlos Eduardo: “Unvollständigkeit, Widersprüchlichkeit and Unbestimmtheit der Normenordunungen”, in A. G. Conte, R. Hilpinen, G. H. von Wright (eds.): Deontische Logik and Semantik, Athenaion, Wiesbaden, pp. 20–32. 1977

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conte Amedeo G.: “Minima deontica”, Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto, 65, pp. 425–75. Guastini 1988

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guastini Riccardo: “In tema di abrogazione”, in C. Luzzati (ed.): L’abrogazione delle leggi. Un dibattito analitico, Giuffre, Milano, pp. 3–31. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guastini Riccardo: “Interpretive Statements”, in E. Garzón Valdés, W. Krawietz, G. H. von Wright, R. Zimmerling (eds.): Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrün and Eugenio Bulygin, Duncker and Humblot, Berlin, pp. 279–92. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hernandez Malin Rafel: El derecho coma dogma, Tecnos, Madrid. 1984

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kosko Bart: Fuzzy Thinking, Flamingo, London. 1994

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luzzati Claudio: “Abrogazione ed indeterminatezza nell’ordinamento giuridico”, in C. Luzzati (ed.): L’abrogazione delle leggi. Un dibattito analitico, Giuffrè, Milano, pp. 65–75. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mazzarese Tecla: “Antinomia”, in: Digesto IV edizione. Sezione Civile, Vol. I, UTET, Torino, pp. 347–53.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mazzarese Tecla: “Variazioni in tema d’abrogazione”, in C. Luzzati (ed.): L’abrogazione delle leggi. Un dibattito analitico, Giuffrè, Milano, pp. 77–91. 1987

    Google Scholar 

  17. Logica deontica e linguaggio giuridico. Padova, Cedam. 1989

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mazzarese Tecla: “ ‘Norm Proposition’: Epistemic and Semantic Queries”, Rechtstheorie, 22, pp. 39–70. Mazzarese 1996

    Google Scholar 

  19. Forme di razionalità delle decisioni giudiziali,Giappichelli, Torino. Mazzarese [in print]Mazzarese Tecla, “Semantic and Pragmatic Fuzziness of Legal Language”, Archivum luridicum Cracoviense [in print]. Mazzarese [manuscript] Mazzarese Tecla: “Literal Interpretation: Jurists and Linguists Confronted. Report to the IVR 18th World Congress”,La Plata/Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mendonca Daniel: lnterpretación y aplicación del derecho, Universidad de Almeria, Almeria. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merkl Adolf: “Zum Interpretationsproblem”, Grünhutsche Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht und öffentliche Recht der Gegenwart, 42, pp. 535–56. 1916

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moreso José Juan: “Sobre normas inconstitucionales”, Doxa, 11, pp. 247–62. 1993

    Google Scholar 

  23. Niiniluoto Ilkka: “On Truth and Argumentation in Legal Dogmatics”, in A. Aarnio, I. Niiniluoto, J. Uusitalo (eds.): Methodologie und Erkenntnistheorie der juristischen Argumentation, Duncker und Humblot, Berlin, pp. 53–76. 1981

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niiniluoto Ilkka: “On Truth of Norm Propositions”, in I. Tammelo, A. Aarnio (eds.): On the Advancement of Theory and Tecnique in Law and Ethics, Duncker und Humblot, Berlin, pp. 171–80. 1981

    Google Scholar 

  25. Niiniluoto Bkka: “Norm Propositions Defended”, Ratio funs, 4, pp. 367–73. 1991

    Google Scholar 

  26. Opalek Kazimierz: “Les normes, les énoncés sur les normes et les propositions déontiques”, Archives de philosophie du droit, 17, pp. 355–72. 1972

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peczenik Aleksander and Wroblewski Jerzy: “Fuzziness and Transformation: Towards Explaining Legal Reasoning”, Theoria, 51, pp. 24–44. 1985

    Google Scholar 

  28. Philipps Lothar: “Naheliegende Anwendungen neuronaler Netze in der Rechtswissenschaft”, Iur PC, 11–12, pp. 820–27. 1990

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reisinger Leo: “Über die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Theorie unscharfer Mengen (Fuzzy Set Theory) im Recht”, Datenverarbeitung im Recht, 4, pp. 19–157. 1975

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reisinger Leo: “Legal Reasoning by Analogy. A Model Applying Fuzzy Set Theory”, in C. Ciampi (ed.): Artificial Intelligence and Legal Information Systems, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, vol. I, pp. 151–63. 1982

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ross Alf: On Law and Justice, Stevens, London. 1958

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scarpelli Uberto: “Contributo alla semantica del linguaggio normativo”, Torino, Memoria dell’Accademia delle scienze di Torino. Reprint ed. by A. Pintore, Giuffre, Milano, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Twining William and Miers David: How to Do Things with Rules, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London. 1976

    Google Scholar 

  34. Von Wright Georg Henrik: Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. 1963

    Google Scholar 

  35. Von Wright Georg Henrik: “Ought to Be-Ought to Do”, in G. H. von Wright: Six Essays in Philosophical Logic, Acta Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki, pp. 63–70. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wróblewski Jerzy: “Fuzziness of Legal System”, in U. Kangas (ed.): Essays in Legal Theory in Honor of Kaarle Makkonen. Monographic issue of Oikeustiede, 16, pp. 311–30. 1983

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wróblewski Jerzy: The Judicial Application of Law, ed. by Z. Bankowski and N. MacCormick, Reidel, Dordrecht. 1992

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università di Pavia, Italy

    Tecla Mazzarese

Authors
  1. Tecla Mazzarese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Università Roma Tre, Rome, Italy

    Rosaria Egidi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mazzarese, T. (1999). “Norm Proposition” a Tentative Defense of a Sceptical View. In: Egidi, R. (eds) In Search of a New Humanism. Synthese Library, vol 282. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1852-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1852-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5260-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1852-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation