Abstract
Members of the Vienna Circle played a pivotal role in defining the work that came to be known as the philosophy of science, yet the Vienna Circle itself is now known to have had much broader concerns and to have been more rooted in philosophical tradition (especially neo-Kantianism) than was once thought. Like current and past philosophers of science, members of the Vienna Circle took science as the object of philosophical reflection (whether to provide a foundation for the sciences or simply to clarify scientific terminology and assumptions,) but they also endeavored to render philosophy in general compatible with contemporary science and to define and promote a scientific world view. This latter task seems to continue the work of so-called scientific philosophy, a label embraced by many philosophers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, such as Helmholtz, Mach, Avenarius, the neo-Kantians, Husserl, Carus, Peirce, and, of course, Russell during the period when he was applying modern logic to philosophical problems. Russell’s program influenced Carnap directly, though the idea of applying modem logic to philosophical problems became a defining feature of analytic philosophy and was applied to many areas of philosophy, not only to the philosophy of science. Scientific philosophy included the promotion of the cultural values of modernity, especially the values embodied in the scientific world conception. By exploring the various meanings ascribed to scientific philosophy in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, I will investigate whether the promotion of scientific philosophy and of the values associated with a scientific world conception is merely part of a transitory social context within which Logical Positivism developed or if it is an enduring part of the philosophy of science. Moreover, the residue of values remaining in the philosophy of science can be brought to light by studying its history.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albers, Donald J., Gerald L. Alexanderson and Constance Reid (1986). International Mathematical Congresses: an Illustrated History, 1893–1986. New York: Springer Verlag.
Benjamin, Walter (1936). “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Zeitschriftfür Sozialforschung translated by H. Zohn, reprinted in Illuminations. H. Arendt, ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co, 1968, pp. 219–253.
Bernal, J. D. et al (1975). Science, Internationalism and War. New York: Arno Press Reprint of Science against War, an excerpt from Science for Peace and Socialism, by J. D. Bernal and M. Comforth, published in 1949 by Birch Books, London; of The Nazi Attack on International Science, by J. Needham, published in 1941 by Watts, London; and of Science in Soviet Russia, edited by J. Needham and J. S. Davies, published in 1942 by Watts, London.
Carus, Paul (1895). God: an Enquiry into the Nature of Man’s Highest Ideal and a Solution of the Problem from the Standpoint of Science. Chicago: Open Court.
Carus, Paul (1897). The Gospel of Buddha according to Old Records. Chicago: Open Court.
Carus, Paul (1900). The History of the Devil and the Idea of Evil, from the Earliest Times to the Present Day. Chicago: Open Court.
Cams, Paul (1909). Philosophy as a Science: a Synopsis of Writings of Dr. Paul Cams. Chicago: Open Court.
Condorcet, marquis de (1793). “Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind.” Condorcet: Selected Writings. Keith Baker, ed. and translator. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, 1976, pp. 209–282, on p. 215.
Crawford, Elisabeth T. (1992). Nationalism and Internationalism in Science, 1880–1939: Four Studies of the Nobel Population. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison (1992). “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations 40: 81–128. Eijkman, P. H. and Paul Samuel Reinch (1911). L ‘internationalisme Scientifique (sciences pures et lettres). La Haye: [W. P. van Stockum et Fils].
Forman, Paul (1973). “Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists: The Ideology and its Maintenance in Germany after World War I.” Isis 64: 151–180.
Frank, Phillip (1949). Modern Science and its Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Friedman, Michael (1996). “Overcoming Metaphysics: Carnap and Heidegger.” Origins of Logical Empiricism. Ronald N. Giere and Alan W. Richardson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 45–79.
Galison, Peter (1990). “Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism.” Critical Inquiry 16: 709–52.
Galison, Peter (1996). “Constructing Modernism: The Cultural Location of Aufbau.” Origins of Logical Empiricism. Ronald N. Giere and Alan W. Richardson, Eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 17–44.
Garber, Daniel (1992). Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Giere, Ronald (1996). “From Wissenschaftliche Philosophie to the Philosophy of Science.” Origins of Logical Empiricism. Ronald N. Giere and Alan W. Richardson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Griffin, Nicholas (1991). Russell’s Idealist Apprenticeship. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Hager, Paul J. (1994). Continuity and Change in the Development of Russell’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Herf, Jeffery (1984). Reactionary Modernism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Husserl, Edmund (1965). Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy: Philosophy as Rigorous Science, and Philosophy and the Crisis of European man. New York: Harper & Row.
Lyons, F. S. L. (1963). Internationalism in Europe, 1815–1914. Leyden: A. W. Sythoff.
McCumber, John (2000). Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ongley, John (2000). “Re: Kuhn, Fuller, Giere, et al.” HOPOS-L: A Forum for Discussion of the History of the Philosophy of Science. 11:48 AM June 14, 2000.
Reichenbach, 1951, The Rise of Scientific Philosophy Berkeley: University of California Press. Richardson, Alan (1992). “Logical Idealism and Camap’s Construction of the World. ” Synthese 93: 59–92.
Richardson, Alan (1992). “Metaphysics and Idealism in the Aufbau.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 43: 45–72.
Richardson, Alan (1997). “Scientific Philosophy.” Perspectives on Science 5 (3): 418–451.
Russell, Bertrand ( 1914, 1993 ). Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Russell, Bertrand (1897). An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, Bertrand (1948). Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits. New York: Simon and Schuster. Uebel, Thomas E. (1995). “Otto Neurath’s Idealist Inheritance: The Socio-economic Theories of Wilhelm Neurath.” Synthese 103: 87–121.
Uebel, Thomas E. (1996). “The Enlightenment Ambition of Epistemic Utopianism: Otto Neurath’s Theory of Science in Historical Perspective.” Origins of Logical Empiricism. Ronald N. Giere and Alan W. Richardson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wick, Warner A. (1951). “The ‘Political’ Philosophy of Logical Empiricism.” Philosophical Studies II (4): 49–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stump, D.J. (2002). From the Values of Scientific Philosophy to the Value Neutrality of the Philosophy of Science. In: Heidelberger, M., Stadler, F. (eds) History of Philosophy of Science. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [2001], vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5976-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1785-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive