Skip to main content

Abstract

This volume of the Handbook of the Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management is about inconsistency and contradictions in logics. In order to provide a context for the volume, we briefly consider in this chapter some general issues of representing and reasoning with notions of contradiction and inconsistency. For the sake of generality in this chapter, logics are here understood as formal systems consisting of a language (in the form of a set of formulas) on which an inference operation C is defined. We will only consider syntactical accounts of inconsistency in the sequel. For a semantical approach to accounting for inconsistency, the reader could consider [Grant 1978].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson A. R. and Belnap N. D. Jr. Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. Princeton University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belnap N. D. Jr. A Useful Four-Valued Logic. In: Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, Dunn J. M. & Epstein G. (eds), pp. 8–37, Reidel, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curry H. B. Foundations of Mathematical Logic. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gabbay D. M. What is Negation in a System? Logic Colloquium ’ 86, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 95–112, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gabbay D. M. and Hunter A. Making Inconsistency Respectable. Funda-mentals of Logics in Artificial Intelligence Research, LNCS 535, pp.19–32, Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabbay D. M. and Wansing H. Negation in Structured Consequence Re-lations. In: Logic, Action, Information, Fuhrmann A. & Rott H. (eds), pp. 328–350, De Gruyter, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grant J. Classifications for Inconsistent Theories. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3), pp. 435–444, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Konolige K. On the Relation between Default and Autoepistemic Logic. Artificial Intelligence Journal 35, pp. 343–382, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson D. Constructible Falsity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 14, pp. 16–26, 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiter R. A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Journal 13, pp. 81–132, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wansing, 1996] Wansing H. Negation. A Notion in Focus. De Gruyter, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Besnard, P., Hunter, A. (1998). Introduction to Actual and Potential Contradictions. In: Besnard, P., Hunter, A. (eds) Reasoning with Actual and Potential Contradictions. Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1739-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1739-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5063-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics