Abstract
This chapter focuses on connectionist models of reading development, and outlines several different ways in which connectionist modelling both has been, and could be, used to advance the theoretical understanding of reading development.
Several different developmental possibilities are distinguished in the context of a discussion of connectionist models. In connectionist terms literacy development could in principle be constrained by various distinct factors, including at least (a) the small or unrepresentative nature of the fragment of the spelling-to-sound mapping system early learners are exposed to; (b) the length of time a learning mechanism requires to develop a good model of the statistical structure of the language; (c) the slow development of the representations that allow the relevant generalisations to be learned, and (d) more general limitations in the representational capacity of the learning system throughout development. Computational modelling allows a clear and explicit distinction between, and exploration of, each of these factors.
In reality, of course, it is likely that limitations on literacy development are a composite of these and other factors, and that the factors interact with one another to define a rather complex developmental trajectory. But this is precisely the point at which connectionist modelling may make a useful contribution, because the examination of artificial learning systems may allow us to tease apart the contributions of the different elements in a way that will never be possible by empirical investigation alone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R., & Milson, R. (1989). Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96, 703–719.
Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science. 2. 396–408.
Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678–723.
Bechtel, W. & Abrahamsen, A. A. (1991). Connectionism and the Mind An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D, Brooksher, R., Lemos, Z., Ogier, S., Zook, D., & Mostafapour, E. (2000). A connectionist approach to making the predictability of English orthography explicit to at-risk beginning readers. Evidence for alternative, effective strategies. Developmental Neuropsychology, 17, 241–271.
Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S. & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review. 97, 432–446.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read -causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
Brown, G. D. A. (1995). A rational analysis of reading: Spelling-to-sound translation is optimal.
Brown, G. D. A. (1987) Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 23, 1–23.
Brown, G. D. A. (1997). Connectionism, phonology, reading, and regularity in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 59, 207–235.
Brown, G. D. A. (1998). The endpoint of reading instruction The ROAR model. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy. Mahwah, NJ: LEA (pp. 121–138 )
Bullmaria, J. A. (1995). Neural network models of reading Solving the alignment problem without Wickelfeatures. In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, J. A. Bullinaria, & D. Cairns (Eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language. London: UCL Press. (pp. 161–178 ).
Bullinaria, J. A. (1997). Modeling reading, spelling, and past tense learning with artificial neural networks. Brain and Language. 59. 236–266.
Chater, N. (1995). Neural networks: the new statistical models of mind. In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, J. A. Bullinaria, & D. Cairns (Eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language. London: UCL Press. (pp. 207–227 ).
Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1990). Autonomy, implementation and cognitive architecture: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Cognition, 34, 93–107.
Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999). Ten years of the rational analysis of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3. 56–65.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and paralleldistributed-processing accounts. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
Cortese, M. J. (1998). Revisiting serial position effects in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 652–665.
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–79.
Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.
French, R. M., & Chater, N. (2002). Using noise to compute error surfaces in connectionist networks: A novel means of reducing catastrophic forgetting. Neural Computation, 14, 1755–1769.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
Harm, M. W. (1998). Division of labor in a computational model of visual word recognition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, August 1998.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
Hulme, C., Quinlan, P., Bolt, G., & Snolwing, M. J. (1995). Building phonological knowledge into a connectionist model of the development of word naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 387–391.
Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Quinlan, P. (1991). Connectionism and learning to read: Steps towards a psychologically plausible model. Reading and Writing, 3, 59–168.
Jared, D., McRae, K. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687–715.
Levine, D. S. (1991). Introduction to neural and cognitive modeling. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Manis, F., Seidenberg, M., Doi, L., McBride-Chang, C., & Peterson, A. (1996). On the basis of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157–195.
Marcus, G. F. (1995). The acquisition of the English past tense in children and multilayered connectionist networks. Cognition., 56, 271–179.
McClelland, J. L. (1998). Connectionist models and Bayesian inference. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition. Oxford: OUP. (pp. 21–53 ).
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419–457.
McLeod, P., Plunkett, K., & Rolls, E. T. (1998). Introduction to connectionist modelling of cognitive processes. Oxford: OUP.
Metsala, J. L., & Brown, G. D.A. (1998). Normal and dyslexic reading development: The role of formal models. In R. M. Joshi & C. Hulme (Eds.), Reading and Spelling: Development and disorders. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. (pp. 235–262 ).
Metsala, J. L., Stanovich, K. E., & Brown, G. D.A. (1998). Regularity effects and the phonological deficit model of reading disabilities: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 279–293.
Mozer, M. C., & Smolensky, P. (1989). Using relevance to reduce network size automatically. Connection Science, 1, 3–16.
Norris, D. (1994). A quantitative model of reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1212–1232.
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1998). (Eds.) Rational models of cognition. Oxford: OUP
Perry, C, & Ziegler, J. C. (2002). Cross-language computational investigation of the length effect in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 28, 990–1001.
Phillips, W. A., Hay, I. M., & Smith, L. S. (1993). Lexicality and pronunciation in a simulated neural net. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 46, 193–205
Pinker, S. & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S. & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–105.
Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 43–102.
Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building. Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition. 48. 21–69.
Quinlan, P. (1991). Connectionism and Psychology. London: Harvester.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277–282.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experunental Psychology–Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482–503
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: Reply to Zorzi (2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1232 - l235.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal presentations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol.1). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/ MiT Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs. In I. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
Sejnowski, T. J. & Rosenberg, C. R. (1987). Parallel Networks that learn to pronounce English Text. Complex Systems, 1, 145–168.
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Towards a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
Stanovich, K.B., & Siegel, L S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.
Thomas, M., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (in press). Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling. Behavioural and Brain Sciences.
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 124, 107–136.
Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488–522
Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25, 111–172.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency.Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 50, 439–456.
Zorzi, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology’ Human Perception and Performance, 26, 847–856.
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998a). The development of spelling-sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 337–371.
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998b). Two routes or one in reading aloud? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131–1161.
Suggested Further Readings
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
Thomas, M., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (in press). Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling. Behavioural and Brain Sciences.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, G.D.A., Chater, N. (2004). Connectionist Models of Children’s Reading. In: Nunes, T., Bryant, P. (eds) Handbook of Children’s Literacy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1731-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1731-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6422-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1731-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive