Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants ((CMBP,volume 2))

Abstract

Self-incompatibility systems in flowering plants have, over the last sixty years, been repeatedly compared and classified into a remarkably consistent plan which has stood the test of time. Probably the most constant part of the plan has been the genetic control of the pollen into two distinct classes: Gametophytic, with the S gene being transcribed and translated in the gametophyte, the pollen grain, after the genes have segregated at meiosis, and the Sporophytic, with the gene being transcribed and probably translated before meiosis in the sporophytic tissue. This tissue may be pre-meiotic cells or special nutrient tissue, the tapetum, but genetically this is irrelevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barlow, N. (1923) Inheritance of the three forms in trimorphic species. J. Genet. 13: 133–146. Bateman, A.J., (1954) Self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms II. Iberis amara. Heredity 8: 305–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W. (1909) Mendel’s Principles of Heredity. Cambridge, U.K.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W. and Gregory, R.P. (1905) On the inheritance of heterostylism in Primula. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 76: 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J.L. (1957) Pollen cytology and self-incompatibility systems in plants. J. Heredity 48: 271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, R.A. and MacGillivray, J.H. (1924) Segregation for the waxy character in maize pollen and differential development of the male gametophyte. Am. J. Bot. 11: 465–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correns, C. (1912) Selbststerilität und Individualstoffe. Festschr. d. mat.-nat. Gesell. zur 84. Versamml. Deut. Naturforsch. Ärzte, Munster i. W., 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerec, M. (1924) A case of pollen dimorphism in maize. Am. J. Bot. 2: 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E.M. and Mangelsdorf, A.J. (1925) A new interpretation of the hereditary behaviour of self-sterile plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 11: 166–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, D.U. (1950) Self-incompatibility studies in Guayule II. Inheritance. Genetics 35: 482–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J., Heslop-Harrison, Y. and Barber, J. (1975) The stigma surface in incompatibility response. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 188: 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinata, K. and Nishio, T. (1978) S-Allele specificity of stigma proteins in Brassica oleracea and B. campestris. Heredity 41: 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M.B. and Babcock, E.B. (1950) Self-incompatibility in Crepis foetida (L.) subsp. Rhoeadifolia ( Bieb.) Schinz et Keller. Genetics 35: 570–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, J., Verma, S.C. and Sareen, T.S. (1990) Genetics of self-incompatibility in a Japanese cultivar of radish, Raphanus sativus cv. Kazusa ( Cruciferae ). Incompatibility Newslett. 22: 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, J., Verma, S.C. and Sareen, T.S. (1992) Floral polymorphism and analysis of selfincompatibility in Raphanus sativus cv. China Rose ( Cruciferae ). Incompatibility Newslett. 24: 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. and Rogers, H.H. (1955) Incompatibility in Theobroma Cacao. Heredity 9: 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroh, M. (1956) Genetische und Entwicklungsphysiologische Untersuchungen über die selbststerilität von Raphanus raphanistrum. Z.I.A. V. 87: 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1944) Incompatibility in plants: its genetical and physiological synthesis. Nature 153: 578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1954) Comparative incompatibility in Angiosperms and Fungi. Adv. Genet. 6: 235–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., Verma, S.C. and Zuberi, M.I. (1988) Gametophytic-sporophytic incompatibility in the Cruciferae — Raphanus sativus. Heredity 61: 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, A. (1975) Complex self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 188: 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, A. (1990a) One-locus sporophytic S-gene system with traces of gametophytic pollen control in Cerastium arvense subsp. strictum ( Caryophyllaceae ). Hereditas 113: 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, A. (1990b) Variability within and among populations in the 4-gene system for control of self-incompatibility in Ranunculus polyanthemos. Hereditas 113: 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasrallah, M.E. and Wallace, D.H. (1967) Immunogenetics of self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea L. Heredity 22: 519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Nettancourt, D. (1977) Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockendon, D.J. (1975) Dominance relationships between S-alleles in the stigmas of brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. Gemmifera). Euphytica 24: 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K.K. (1970) Time and site of the S-gene action, breeding systems and relationships in incompatibility. Euphytica 19: 364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, R. and Verma, S.C. (1992) Some considerations in the study of genetics of self-incompatibility in Eruca sativa ( Cruciferae ). Incompatibility Newslett. 24: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, H.P. (1932) Self-sterility in Shepherd’s purse. Genetics 17: 231–295.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, R.H., Elleman, C.J. and Dickinson, H.G. (1988) Control of pollen hydration in Brassica requires continued protein synthesis, and glycosylation is necessary for intraspecific incompatibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85: 4340–4344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K.F. (1968) Classified S-alleles for Brassica breeders, Proceedings of the Eucarpia Brassica Meeting, pp 25–28. Wellesbourne, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usha, D., Verma, S.C. and Sareen, T.S. (1990) Genetics of self-incompatibility in the wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Cruciferae) —III. Complex segregation for pollen-stigma interactions in a bud selfed family. Incompatibility Newslett. 22: 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S.C. and Singla, R.K. (1990) Some observations on fertility and self-incompatibility in Parthenium hysterophorus L. ( Asteraccae ). Incompatibility Newslett. 22: 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S.C., Malik, R. and Dhir, I. (1977) Genetics of the incompatibility system in the crucifer Eruca sativa L. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 96: 131–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberi, M.I. and Lewis, D. (1988) Gametophytic-sporophytic incompatibility in the Cruciferae — Brassica campestris. Heredity 61: 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, D. (1994). Gametophytic-sporophytic incompatibility. In: Williams, E.G., Clarke, A.E., Knox, R.B. (eds) Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1669-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1669-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4340-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1669-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics