Intuitions and Schemata in Mathematical Reasoning



The present paper is an attampt to analyze the relationship between intuitions and structural schemata. Intuitions are defined as cognitions which appear subjectively to be self-evident, immediate, certain, global, coercive. Structural schemata are behavioral-mental devices which make possible the assimilation and interpretation of information and the adequate reactions to various stimuli. Structural schemata are characterized by their general relevance for the adaptive behavior. The main thesis of the paper is that intuitions are generally based on structural schemata. The transition from schemata to intuitions is achieved by a particular process of compression described in the paper.


Correct Answer Formal Proof Structural Schema Mathematical Reasoning Intuitive Estimation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balzan, M.: 1997, ‘Difficulties in Understanding the Concept of Sets’, Masters Thesis, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  2. Bastick, T.: 1982, Intuition: How we Think and Act, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  3. Bergson, H.: 1954, Creative Evolution (translated by A. Mitchell ), Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J.: 1965, The Process of Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Bunge, M.: 1962, Intuition and Science, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  6. Carey, S.: 1985, Conceptual Change in Childhood, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, F. B. and Kamii, C.: 1996, ‘Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1–5’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clement, J., Brown, D. E. and Zietsman, A.: 1989, ‘Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions’, International Journal for Science Education 11, 554–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Descartes, R.: 1967, The Philosophical Works (Vol. 1), (translated by E. S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross), The University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. DiSessa, A. A.: 1988, Knowledge in pieces, in G. Forman and P. B. Putall (eds.), Constructivism in Computer Age, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
  11. Fischbein, E.: 1963, Conceptele Figurale [The figural concepts], in Roumanian Bucharest, Editura Academiei, R.S.R.Google Scholar
  12. Fischbein, E.: 1975, The Intuitive Sources of Probabilistic Thinking in Children, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Fischbein, E.: 1978, ‘Schèmes virtuels et schème actifs dans l’apprentissage des scinces’, Revue Française de Pédagogie, 119–125.Google Scholar
  14. Fischbein, E.: 1987, Intuition in Science and Mathematics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Fischbein, E. and Grossman, A.: 1997, ‘Schemata and intuitions in combinatorial reasoning’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 34, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischbein, E. and Nachlieli, T.: 1997, Concepts and Figures in Geometrical Reasoning,submitted.Google Scholar
  17. Fischbein, E. and Schnarch, D.: 1997, ‘The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D. and Hess, P.: 1979, ‘The intuition of infinity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 10, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D. and Melamed, U.: 1981, Is it possible to measure the intuitive acceptance of a mathematical statement?’ Education Studies in Mathematics 12, 49 1512.Google Scholar
  20. Flavell, J.: 1963, The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget, Van Nostrand, Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
  21. Gelman, R. S. and Gallistel, C. R.: 1978, The Child’s Understanding of Number, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  22. Hahn, H.: 1956, ‘The crisis of intuition’, in J. Newman (ed.), The World of Mathematics, Simon and Schuster, New York, v. 3, pp. 1957–1976.Google Scholar
  23. Kant, I.: 1980, Critique of Pure Reason, (translated by N.K. Smith), Macmillan, London. Kline, M.: 1980, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. McCloskey, M., Washburn, A. and Felch, L.: 1983, ‘Intuitive physics. The straight-down belief and its origin’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9, 636–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piaget, J.: 1980, Experiments in Contradiction, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
  26. Piaget, J., Infielder, B. and Szeminska, A.: 1960, La Géometrie Spontanée de l’Enfant, Press Universitaire de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Reber, A. S.: 1995, Dictionary of Psychology, Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
  28. Resnick, L. B.: 1987, ‘The development of mathematical intuitions’, in M. Perlmater (ed.), Minnesota Symposium of Child Psychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, p. 159–194.Google Scholar
  29. Rumelhart, D. E.: 1980, ‘Schemata: The building blocks of cognition’, in R. T. Spiro, B. C. Bruce and W. F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  30. Spinoza, B.: 1967, Ethics and Treatise on the Correction of the Understanding, (translated by A. Boyle ), Everyman’s Library, London.Google Scholar
  31. Stavy, R. and Tirosh, D.: 1996, ‘The role of intuitive rules in science and mathematics education’, European Journal of Teacher Education, 19, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stavy, R., Tirosh, D. and Tsamir, P.: 1997, ‘Intuitive rules and comparison tasks: The grasp of vertical angles’, in G. Makrides (ed.), Mathematics Education and Applications, Cyprus Pedagogical Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus, pp. 269–276.Google Scholar
  33. Thurston, V. P.: 1990, ‘Mathematical education’, Notices of the American Mathematical Society 137, 850–884.Google Scholar
  34. Tirosh, D.: 1991, The role of students’ intuitions of infinity in teaching the Cantorian theory, in D. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
  35. Westcott, M. R.: 1968, Towards a Contemporary Psychology of Intuition, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Wilkening, F.: 1980, ‘Development of dimensional integration in children’s perceptual judgment: Experiments with area, volume and velocity’, in F. Wilkening, J. Becker and T. Trabasco (eds.), Information Integration by Children, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  37. Zamir, T.: 1996, ‘Combinatorial intuitions’, Masters Thesis, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (in Hebrew).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations