Advertisement

Integrating Academic and Practical Knowledge in a Teacher Leaders’ Development Program

Chapter

Abstract

This study examines an attempt to encourage integration of knowledge learned in the academy with knowledge learned in practice as a means to challenge educational practitioners’ — teacher leaders and inservice teacher educators — existing conceptions and beliefs, and promote intellectual restructuring. The article centers on two components of the Manor Program for the development of teacher leaders and educators. The first component focuses on expanding academic knowledge, by helping the participants become acquainted with studies on students’ and teachers’ conceptions and ways of thinking in mathematics. The second component focuses on the integration of knowledge learned in the academy with knowledge learned in practice by conducting a mini-study.

Keywords

Mathematics Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge Theoretical Knowledge Practical Knowledge Project Staff 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amit, M. and Vinner, S.: 1990. ‘Some misconceptions in calculus: Anecdotes or the tip of an iceberg?’, in G. Booker, P. Cobb and T.N. de Mendicuti (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Program Committee, Mexico, Vol. 1, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  2. Arcavi, A., Friedlander, A. and Hershkowitz, R.: 1990, ‘The algebra before algebra’, Mesarim-Misparim (Journal for Mathematics Teachers in Israel), 3 (3), 48–62 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  3. Arcavi, A. and Schoenfeld, A.H.: 1988, ‘On the meaning of variable’, Mathematics Teacher 81, 420–427.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D.L.: 1990, ‘Examining the subject matter knowledge of prospective mathematics teachers’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21 (2), 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, C.: 1991, ‘Building a case-based curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers’. Journal of Teacher Education 42 (4), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, A. and Janvier C.: 1981, ‘The interpretation of graphs representing situations’, For the Learning of Mathematics 2 (1), 34–42.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Zvi, D. and Friedlander, A.: 1997, ‘Statistical thinking in a technological environment’, in J.B. Garfield and G. Burrill (eds.), Proceedings of the International Association for Statistical Education Round Table Conference. International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, The Netherlands, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar
  8. Bromme, R. and Tillema, H.: 1995, ‘Fusing experience and theory: The structure of professional knowledge’, Learning and Instruction 5 (4), 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinn, C.A. and Brewer, W.F.: 1993, ‘The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction’, Review of Educational Research 63 (1), 1–49.Google Scholar
  10. Cobb, P., Wood, T. and Yackel, E.: 1990. ‘Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers’, in R.B. Davis. C.A. Maher and N. Noddings (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 125–146.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, A., Brown, J.S. and Newman, S.E.: 1989, ‘Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics’, in L.B. Resnick (ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 453–493.Google Scholar
  12. Desforges, C.: 1995, ‘How does experience affect theoretical knowledge for teaching?’, Learning and Instruction 5 (4), 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Even, R.: 1993, ‘Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: prospective secondary teachers and the function concept’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24 (2), 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Even, R.: 1994, ‘Tel-Aviv Project for Improving Mathematics Teaching in Junior-High Schools: A Teacher Development Approach (1990–1993)’. Unpublished manuscript, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  15. Even, R.: 1998, ‘Factors involved in linking representations of functions’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 17(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
  16. Even, R.: ‘The development of teacher-leaders and in-service teacher educators’, Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education,in press.Google Scholar
  17. Even, R. and Markovits, Z.: 1993, ‘Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of functions: Characterization and applications’, Journal of Structural Learning 12 (1), 35–51.Google Scholar
  18. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., Franke, M., Levi, L., Jacobs. V. and Empson, S.: 1996, ‘A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27 (4), 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanna, G.: 1990, ‘Some pedagogical aspects of proof’, Interchange 21 (1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hershkowitz, R.: 1990, ‘Psychological aspects of learning geometry’, in P. Nesher and J. Kilpatrick (eds.), Mathematics and cognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hershkowitz, R. and Schwarz, B.B.: 1995. Reflective Processes in a Technology-Based Mathematics Classroom, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San-Francisco.Google Scholar
  22. Küchemann, D.E.: 1981, ‘Algebra’, in K.M. Hart (ed.), Children’s Understanding of Mathematics, John Murray, London, pp. 102–119.Google Scholar
  23. Jensen, J.R. and Wagner, S.: 1981, ‘Three perspectives on the process uniformity of beginning algebra students’, in S. Wagner (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the PME-NA, Athens, GA, pp. 133–139.Google Scholar
  24. Kennedy, M.M.: 1997, ‘The connection between research and practice’, Educational Researcher 26 (7), 4–12.Google Scholar
  25. Lampert, M.: 1990, ‘When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching’. American Educational Research Journal 27 (1), 29–63.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, L. and Wheeler, D.: 1986, ‘High school students’ conception of justification in algebra’, in G. Lappan and R. Even (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the PME-NA, East Lansing, MI, pp. 94–101.Google Scholar
  27. Leinhardt, G., McCarthy Young, K.M. and Merriman. J.: 1995. ‘Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory’, Learning and Instruction 5 (4), 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markovits, Z. and Even, R.: in press, ‘Mathematics classroom situations: in-service course for elementary school teachers’, in B. Jaworski, T. Wood and A.J. Dawson (eds.), Mathematics Teacher Education: Critical International Perspectives,Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1991. Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics, Author, Reston. VA.Google Scholar
  30. Rhine, S.: 1998, ‘The role of research and teachers’ knowledge base in professional development’, Educational Researcher 27 (5). 27–31.Google Scholar
  31. Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22 (1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sfard, A.: 1995, ‘The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 14. 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strauss, S. and Shilony, T.: 1994. ‘Teachers’ models of children’s minds and learning’, in I. Hirschfeld and S.A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tall, D.O. and Schwarzenberger, R.L.E.: 1978. ‘Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits’, Mathematics Teaching 82, 44–49.Google Scholar
  35. Tirosh, D. and Graeber, A.: 1990, ‘Inconsistencies in preservice teachers’ beliefs about multiplication and division’, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 12, 65–74.Google Scholar
  36. Vinner, S. and Dreyfus, T.: 1989. ‘Images and definitions for the concept of function’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20. 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Science TeachingWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations