Terrain as a Factor in the Battle of Normandy, 1944

  • Stephen Badsey
Part of the The GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 64)


The battle of Normandy lasted from 6th June to 25th August 1944, and is one of the best documented battles of the Second World War, with an extensive primary and secondary literature. It resulted in an overwhelming victory for the Allied forces over the defending Germans. Despite this, the historiography of the battle has been dominated by two controversies. The first of these concerns the failure of the Allied forces to achieve important designated objectives in their amphibious and airborne landing on D-Day, 6th June. The second concerns the time and human cost taken to defeat the defending German forces. Historiography attributes these failings principally to disagreements and poor performances on the part of senior Allied commanders, and/or to superior military skills possessed by German commanders and their forces. This paper addresses these two controversies, and argues that in both cases a principal reason for the battle developing as it did was the nature of the terrain of the battlefield, a factor to which insufficient attention has been paid in the making of historical judgements.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Badsey, S. 1980. The American experience of armour 1919–1953. In: Harris, J. R. and Toase, F. H. (Eds), Armoured Warfare. Batsford, London, 124–144.Google Scholar
  2. Badsey, S. 1990. Normandy 1944: Allied Landings and Breakout. Osprey, London.Google Scholar
  3. Badsey, S. 1993. D-Day: From the Normandy Beaches to the Liberation of France. CLB, Godalming.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, C. 1960. The Desert Generals. George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  5. Baxter, C. F. 1995. Did Nazis fight better than democrats? Parameters 25, 113118.Google Scholar
  6. Belfield, E. and Essame, H. 1965. The Battle for Normandy. Batsford, London.Google Scholar
  7. Blumenson, M. 1961. Breakout and Pursuit. US Department of the Army, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, D.G. and Collins, J.L. (Eds) 1994. The D-Day Encyclopedia. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Van Creveld, M. 1983. Fighting Power. Arms and Armour, London.Google Scholar
  10. Crookenden, N. 1976. Drop Zone Normandy. Allen Lane, London.Google Scholar
  11. Dick, C. J. 1982. The Goodwood concept — situating the appreciation. Journal of the Royal United Services Institution for Defence Studies 127, 22–27.Google Scholar
  12. Dupuy, T. N. 1977. A Genius For War. Macdonald and Janes, London.Google Scholar
  13. d’Este, D’1983. Decision in Normandy. William Collins, London.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenhower, D.D. 1948. Crusade in Europe. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis, J 1990. Brute Force. Andre Deutche, London.Google Scholar
  16. Ellis, L.F. 1962. Victory in the West, Volume I. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  17. Griffith, P. 1981. Forward Into Battle. Anthony Bird, Chichester.Google Scholar
  18. d’Guingand, F. 1947. Operation Victory. Hodder and Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton, N. 1983. Monty: Volume 2, Master of the Battlefield 1942–1944. Hamish Hamilton, London.Google Scholar
  20. Harrison, G.A. 1951. Cross-Channel Attack. US Department of the Army, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, R. 1996. Feeding Mars: the role of logistics in the German defeat in Normandy. War in History 3, 418–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hart, S. 1996. Montgomery, morale, casualty conservation and colossal cracks: 21st Army Group operational technique in north west Europe 1944–45. Journal of Strategic Studies 19, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hart, S. 2000. Montgomery and ‘Colossal Cracks’. Praeger, London and Westport.Google Scholar
  24. Haswell, J. 1979. The Intelligence and Deception of the D-Day Landings. Batsford, London.Google Scholar
  25. Hastings, M. 1984. Overlord: D-Day and the Battle for Normandy. Michael Joseph, London.Google Scholar
  26. Hesketh, R. 1999. Fortitude: The D-Day Deception Campaign. St. Ermins, London.Google Scholar
  27. How, J. J. 1981. Normandy - The British Breakout. Kimber, London.Google Scholar
  28. Irving, D. 1981. The War Between the Generals. Allen Lane, London.Google Scholar
  29. Keegan, J. 1982. Six Armies in Normandy. Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
  30. Liddell Hart, B.H. 1951 The Other Side of the Hill. Revised edition, Cassell, London.Google Scholar
  31. Lucas, J. and Barker, J. 1978. The Killing Ground. Batsford, London.Google Scholar
  32. Marshall, S.L.A. 1962. Night Drop. MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  33. Montgomery, B.L. 1946. Normandy to the Baltic. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  34. Moorehead, A. 1946. Montgomery. Hamish Hamilton, London.Google Scholar
  35. Nalty, B.C. (Ed.) 1993. D-Day: Operation Overlord from its Planning to t he Liberation of Paris. Salamander, London.Google Scholar
  36. Rohmer, R. 1981. Patton’s Gap. Arms and Armour, London.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, E.P.F. and Pareyn C. 1995. Geology and the Liberation of Normandy, France, 1944. Geology Today 11, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose, E.P.F. and Pareyn, C. 1998. British applications of military geography for ‘Operation Overlord’ and the battle of NormandyGoogle Scholar
  39. France, 1944. In: Underwood, J.R. and Guth, P.L. (Eds), Military Geology in War and Peace. Reviews in Engineering Geology, XIII Geological Society of America, Boulder, 55–66.Google Scholar
  40. Rose, E.F.P. and Nathanail, C.P. (Eds) 2000. Geology and Warfare: Examples o f the Influence of Terrain and Geologists on Military Operations. The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
  41. Ryan, C. 1960. The Longest Day: June 6, 1944. Victor Golancz, London.Google Scholar
  42. Stacey, C.P. 1960. The Victory Campaign. The Queen’s Publisher, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  43. Walter, A.E.M. 1986. A harbour goes to France. Royal Engineers Journal 100, 14–30.Google Scholar
  44. Wilmot, C. 1952. The Struggle for Europe. Collins, London.Google Scholar
  45. Willmott, H.P. 1989. The Great Crusade. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Badsey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of War StudiesRoyal Military Academy SandhustCamberley SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations