Advertisement

Causality as Constraint

Chapter

Abstract

Suppose you are trying to arrange furniture you already own in your new house. “Each piece of furniture has some weak constraints associated with it. For example, the bed must go against a wall because the headboard is rickety; two small tables go on either side of the bed; the couch is missing its back legs and so sits on books, which means it must go against a wall so that the back is not visible, and so on. The constraints associated with each piece of furniture are weak because each one can be satisfied in many ways; the bed, for example, can be put against any of several walls. However, once the bed is placed, the entire arrangement may be determined: there may be only one other wall large enough for the couch, the tables must go next to the bed, and so forth” (Kosslyn & Koenig, 1992, p. 111).

Keywords

Sand Dune Weak Constraint Contextual Constraint Supervenient Property Maximum Entropy State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell, J., 1982, Grammatical Man, New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Casti, J.L., 1994, Complexification, New York, Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Depew, D.J.; Weber, B.H., 1995, Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Earley, J., 1981, Self-Organization and Agency: in Chemistry and Process Philosophy, Process Studies, vol. 11, pp. 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gadin, L., 1972, Information and the Living System, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hayles, N.K., 1990, Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemprorary Literature and Science, Ithaca-NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Holyoak, K.J.; Thagard, P., 1995, Mental Leaps, Car bridge MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kosslyn, S.M.; Koenig, O., 1992, Wet Mind,Free Pr:Google Scholar
  9. Langton, C., 1995, Artificial Life: An Overview, Camb.;a MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lewin, R., 1993, Complexity: Life on the Edge of Chacs, New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Lindsay, R.B., 1961, Physical Mechanics,Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  12. Pattee, H., 1973, Hierarchy Theory, New York, George Braziller.Google Scholar
  13. Popper, K., 1990, A world of Propensities,Thoemmes.Google Scholar
  14. Salthe, S., 1985, Evolving Hierarchical Systems, New York, Columbia university Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ulanowicz, R., 1994, The Propensities of Evolving Systems, in Social and Natural Systems, E.L. K. Boulding (eds. ), Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Waldrop, M., 1993, Complexity,Touchstone.Google Scholar
  17. Zeleny, M., 1980, Autopoiesis, Dissipative Structures, and Spontaneous Social Orders,Westview.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPrince George’s Community CollegeLargoUSA

Personalised recommendations