The role of vegetative spread and seed dispersal for optimal life histories of clonal plants: a simulation study

  • E. WinklerEmail author
  • M. Fischer


Sexual and vegetative reproduction of clonal plants phenotypically differ in dispersal distance, in the phenology of offspring production and establishment, and in the success of establishment. We applied a combination of analytical and of spatially explicit individual-based simulation modelling to calculate long-term fitness. We predicted optimal clonal plant life histories in a parameter space spanned by stolon number, stolon internode length, and relative allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction. For a given allocation to sexual reproduction and number of stolons, fitness was optimised for rather short internode lengths under small disturbances, and for the longest possible internodes under larger disturbances. A trade-off between length and number of vegetative spacers drew parameters away from their unrestricted optima. Now, intermediate length and number of spacers led to maximum fitness under large disturbances. Simultaneous trade-offs between sexual and vegetative reproduction and between the length and number of spacers could also lead to fitness optima at intermediate parameter values, depending on the success of seedling establishment. We demonstrated that spatial habitat structure (1) selects for an efficient use of available space either by optimum internode length or by investment into seeds, which disperse farther than vegetative spacers, and (2) leads to an interaction between trade-offs. We conclude, that dispersal distance, i.e. a spatial life-history component, and trade-offs must be included in considerations on adaptive evolution of clonal life histories.

Key words

clonal plants dispersal disturbed habitat optimal life histories reproduction simulation model trade-off 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bolker, B.M. and Pacala, S.W. (1999) Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am. Nat. 153, 575–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chesson, P.L. (1985) Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments: a look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability. Theor. Pop. Biol. 28, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crawley, M.J. and May, R. (1987) Population dynamics and plant community structure: competition between annuals and perennials. J. Theor. Biol. 125, 457–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dieckmann, U. (1997) Can adaptive dynamics invade? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 128–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dieckmann, U., O’Hara, B. and Weisser, W. (1999) The evolutionary ecology of dispersal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doebeli, M. and Ruxton, G.D. (1997) Evolution of dispersal rates in metapopulation models: branching and cyclic dynamics in phenotype space. Evolution 51, 1730–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahrig, L., Coffin, D.P., Lauenroth, W.K. and Shugart, H. (1994) The advantage of long distance clonal spreading in highly disturbed habitats. Evol. Ecol. 8, 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner, S.N. and Mangel, M. (1997) When can a clonal organism escape senescence? Am. Nat. 150, 462–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner, S.N. and Mangel, M. (1999) Modelling investments in seeds, clonal offspring, and translocation in a clonal plant. Ecology 80, 1202–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimm, V. (1999) Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecol. Model. 115, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haefner, J.W., Poole, G.C., Dunn, P.V. and Decker, R.T. (1991) Edge effects in computer models of spatial competition. Ecol. Model. 56, 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harada, Y. and Iwasa, Y. (1994) Lattice population dynamics for plants with dispersing seeds and vegetative propagation. Res. Popul. Ecol. 36, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harada, Y. (1999) Short-vs. long-range disperser: the evolutionary stable allocation in a lattice-structured habitat. J. Theor. Biol. 201, 171–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huston, M., De Angelis, D. and Post, W. (1988) New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38, 682–691.Google Scholar
  15. Inghe, O. (1989) Genet and ramet survivorship under different mortality regimes — a cellular automata model. J. Theor. Biol. 138, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johst, K., Doebeli, M. and Brandi, R. (1999) Evolution of complex dynamics in spatially structured populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266, 1147–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johst, K. and Brandi, R. (1999) Natal versus breeding dispersal: evolution in a model system. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 911–921.Google Scholar
  18. Kozlowski, J. (1999) Adaptation: a life history perspective. Oikos 86, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loehle, C. (1987) Partitioning of reproductive effort in clonal plants: a benefit-cost model. Oikos 49, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McPeek, M.A. and Holt, R.D. (1992) The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140, 1010–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muko, S. and Iwasa, Y. (2000) Species coexistence by permanent spatial heterogeneity in a lottery model. Theor. Pop. Biol. 57, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prati, D. and Schmid, B. (2000) Genetic differentiation of life-history traits within populations of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans. Oikos 90, 442–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sackville Hamilton, N.R., Schmid, B. and Harper, J.L. (1987) Life-history concepts and the population biology of clonal organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Loud. B. 232, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sakai, S. (1995) Optimal resource allocation to vegetative and sexual reproduction of a plant growing in a spatially varying environment. J. Theor. Biol. 175, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stearns, S.C. (1992) The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Watson, A.W., Hay, M.J.M. and Newton, C.D. (1997) Developmental phenology and the timing of determination of shoot bud fates: ways in which the developmental program modulates fitness in clonal plants. In H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, p. 31–53.Google Scholar
  27. Winkler, E. and Schmid, B. (1995) Clonal strategies of herbaceous plant species: a simulation study on population growth and competition. In B. Oborny and J. Podany (eds) Clonality in Plant Communities. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Clonal Plants (Abstracta Bot. 19, 17–28 ).Google Scholar
  28. Winkler, E., Fischer, M. and Schmid, B. (1999) Modelling the competitiveness of clonal plants by complementary analytical and simulation approaches. Oikos 85, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winkler, E. and Fischer, M. (1999) Two fitness measures for clonal plants and the importance of spatial aspects. Plant Ecol. 141, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecological ModellingUFZ Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-HalleLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Institut für UmweltwissenschaftenUniversität ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations