On Superconductive Gravity Gradiometry in Space

  • Stefan Zarembiński
Part of the Space Sciences Series of ISSI book series (SSSI, volume 17)


Superconductive gravity gradiometers for space have been expected in vain for more than fifteen years, since the niobium superconductor technology has maturated and became commonly regarded as adequate to the purpose. Therefore an old design idea may be suspected of inefficiency, and new concepts should be considered. We propose one that abandons an attractive yet restrictive method of spatial differentiation by the principle of the magnetic flux conservation. Instead, it uses the SQUID just as a low noise sensor in the test mass displacement transducers, and differentiates by means of a negative feedback. We argue that the feedback can case the known obstacles. Especially, it provides convenient practical means for neutralization of the low frequency SQUID noise, and for correction of dimensional inaccuracies of the sensor mechanics. Moreover, the feedback can organize a cluster of twelve elementary accelerometers into a precise tensor gradiometer that can self-correct its inaccuracies by tuning the cross-coupling between its clenients.


Gravity Gradient Test Mass Torsion Balance Gravity Gradiometer Gravity Gradient Tensor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernard. A. and Touhoul. P.: 1991, ‘The GRADIO accelerometer: design and development status’, In: C. Mattog (ed.): The Solid-Earth mission Aristoteles, ESA Publications Division Nordwijk. Neiherlands. ESTEC. 61–67.Google Scholar
  2. Chan. A. A. and Paik. I-I.: 1987a. ‘Superconducting gravity gradiometer for sensitive gravity easurements. I. Theory’, Phvs. Re’: D 35. 3551–3571.Google Scholar
  3. Chan. A. A. and Paik. H. J.: 1987b. ‘Superconducting gravity gradiometer for sensitive gravity measurements. II. Experiment’. Pkvs. Rev. 35. pp. 3572–3597.Google Scholar
  4. Roussel. P.: 1993. ‘Opening of workshop’. In: J. Flokstra (ed.): Pivceedings oft/ic workshop on high-Tc superconducting grai’itv gradiotnerers. University of Twente. Twente, Netherlands, 7–12.Google Scholar
  5. Sehilling. M., Krey S., and Sehaniweber. R,: 1996, ‘Biomagnetie measurements with an integrated YBa2Cu3O7 magnetometer in a hand-held cryostat’. AppL Plns. Let. 69: 2749–2751.Google Scholar
  6. van Kann. F. J. et al: 1990. ‘Laboratory tests of a mobile superconducting gravity gradiometer’. Phvsico B 166: 93–94.Google Scholar
  7. Zaremhiriski. S. and Clacson. T.: 1992, ‘Design of multi-loop input circuits for high 7j. superconducting quantum interference magnetometers’. J. App l. Phvi 72: 1918–1935.Google Scholar
  8. Zarembiáski. S: 2001. ‘Sensitivity limitation of a superconducting quantum interferometer sensor- based gnivity gradiometer’. IEEE Trans. AppL Supeironduct. 11: 4041–4047.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Zarembiński
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations