Abstract
The design of general problem solvers and general purpose representations has been a driving force in the field of artificial intelligence since its inception (see for example [26, 1, 24, 29]). While there are valid concerns about generality, an equally important issue is efficiency of inference. Special purpose representations are known to be good at that and have been used widely in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence. We propose the use of heterogeneous systems for modeling dynamic worlds. A heterogeneous system is one that employs several kinds of representations. In particular, we are interested in systems that use sentential and diagrammatic languages in parallel. Diagrams are common place in communicating information and for problem solving (see newspapers, reports, and papers and books written on planning, qualitative reasoning, etc. [27, 8]. By combining special purpose diagrammatic representations with general purpose sentential representations we hope to get the best of both worlds, generality and efficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
James F. Allen. Towards a General Theory of Action and Time. Artificial Intelligence 23 (1984) 123–154.
Gerard Allwein, Steve Johnson, and Jon Barwise. Toward the Rigorous Use of Diagrams in Reasoning about Hardware. Manuscript, Indiana University. (1993).
Saul Amarel. On Representations of Problems of Reasoning about Actions. in: Machine Intelligence 3 D. Mitchie (Ed.). Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. (1968) 131–171.
Jon Barwise. Heterogeneous Reasoning. in: Conceptual Graphs and Knowledge Representation. G. Mineau, B. Moulin, and J. Sowa. (Eds.). New York: Springer Verlag, to appear.
Jon Barwise and John Etchemendy. Information, Infons, and Inference. Situation Theory and Its Applications. Robin Cooper et. al. (Eds.) CSLI, Stanford, CA. (1990).
Jon Barwise and John Etchemendy. Hyperproof Stanford: CSLI, to appear.
Jon Barwise and Eric Hammer. Logical Systems as Models of Inference. What is a Logical System D. Gabbay. (Ed.). Oxford University Press, to appear.
D. G. Bobrow, (Ed.). Special Volume on Qualitative Reasoning and Physical Systems. Artificial Intelligence 24(1–3) (1984).
B. Chandrasekaran and N. H. Narayanan. Towards a theory of commonsense visual reasoning. in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 472. K.V. Nori and C.E. Veni Madhavan (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, FRG. (1990) 388–409.
A. K. Dewdney. Computer Recreations. Scientific American 250 (1984) 19–26.
Hubert L. Dreyfus and Stuart E. Dreyfus. How to Stop Worrying about the Frame Problem Even though It’s Computationally Insoluble. The Robot’s Dilemma. Zenon Pylyshyn (Ed.) Ablex, Norwood, NJ, (1987).
Brian V. Funt. Problem-Solving with Diagrammatic Representations. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980) 201–230.
George W. Furnas. Reasoning with Diagrams Only. Working Notes of the AAAI Symposium on Reasoning with Diagrammatic Representations, Stanford, CA. (1992) 118–123.
Realization of a Geometry-Theorem Proving Machine. Computers and Though Edward E. Feigenbaum and Julian Feldman (Eds.) McGraw-Hill, NY, NY. (1963).
Naresh Gupta and Dana S. Nau. On the Complexity of Blocks-World Planning. Artificial Intelligence 56 (1992) 223–254.
Eric Hammer. Reasoning with Sentences and Diagrams. The Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. To appear.
John Haugland. An Overview of the Frame Problem. The Robot’s Dilemma. Zenon Pylyshyn (Ed.) Ablex, Norwood, NJ, (1987).
Patrick J. Hayes. Naive Physics I: Ontology for Liquids. in: Formal Theories of the Common-Sense World. J.R. Hobbs and R.C. Moore (eds.) Ablex, Norwood, NJ, (1985) 1–36.
Patrick J. Hayes. What the Frame Problem Is and Isn’t. The Robot’s Dilemma. Zenon Pylyshyn (Ed.) Ablex, Norwood, NJ, (1987).
Kenneth R. Koedinger and John R. Anderson. Abstract Planning and Perceptual Chunks: Elements of Expertise in Geometry. Cognitive Science 14 (1990) 511–550.
Jill H. Larkin and Herbert A. Simon. Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11 (1987) 65–99.
Michael C. Lewis. Visualization and Situations. Situation Theory and its Applications, Vol.2. Jon Barwise et.al. (Eds.) CSLI Lecture Notes No. 26, CSLI, Stanford, CA. (1991) 553–580.
John McCarthy. Circumscription–A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence. 13 (1980) 27–39.
Drew McDermott. A Temporal Logic for Reasoning About Processes and Plans. Cognitive Science 6 (1982) 101–155.
Karen Myers and Kurt Konolige. Reasoning with Analogical Representations. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Representation. Bernhard Nebel et. al. (Eds.) Morgan Kaufman, Los Altos, CA. (1992).
Allen Newell and H. A. Simon. GPS, A Program that Simulates Human Thought. in: Computers and Though Edward E. Feigenbaum and Julian Feldman (Eds.) McGraw-Hill, NY, NY. (1963).
Nils J. Nilsson. Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Tioga, Palo Alto, CA. (1980).
Charles S. Peirce. The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, volume 4. Ed. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1933.
Yoav Shoham. Reasoning About Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1988).
Herbert A. Simon and William G. Chase. Skill in Chess. American Scientist 61 (1973) 394–403.
Aaron Sloman. Interactions Between Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Intuition and Non-Logical Reasoning in Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 2 (1971) 209–225.
Raymond M. Smullyan. First-order logic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, FRG, (1968).
Jeffrey Van Baalen. Automated Design of Specialized Representations. Artificial Intelligence 54 (1992) 121–198.
David E. Wilkins. Domain-independent Planning: Representations and Plan Generation. Artificial Intelligence 22 (1984) 269–301.
Michael Wollowski. Planning With Diagrams. Manuscript, Indiana University. (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wollowski, M., Hammer, E. (1999). Heterogeneous Systems for Modeling Dynamic Worlds. In: Pareschi, R., Fronhöfer, B. (eds) Dynamic Worlds. Applied Logic Series, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1317-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1317-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5159-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1317-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive