Abstract
An antinomy [a paradox] of logic takes place when two contradictory statements A and ~ A are derived, or equivalently A ≡ (~ A) is derived, without committing a simple logical error. In the area of deductive reasoning such a contradiction is a disaster, but, if genuine, it shows conflicts in our intuitions, incompatibility of areas of applicability of our notions. In the present exposition we shall restrict ourselves to some antinomies important for logic, leaving aside such paradoxes as those of Zeno of Elea concerning continuity and infinity (and the infinitely small), some of the Megarian paradoxes like the Heap or the Horned Man etc. Some of the paradoxes, the so-called logical or set-theoretic ones (see §2) as well as semantic ones (see §3) have been important for the development of logic and of the foundations of mathematics. Their common feature is the use of a kind of circularity in an inadmissible way. Extensive treatment of paradoxes can be found in Kleene (52), Beth (59), Fraenkel et al. (73).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Behmann, H.: Zu den Wiedersprüchen der Logik und Mengenlehre. Jahresbericht Deutsch. Mathem. — Vereinigung 40: 37–48, 1931.
Boolos, G.: The iterative conception of set. Philosophy 8: 215–232, 1971.
Church, A.: Comparison of Russell’s resolution of the semantical antinomies with that of Tarski. J. Symbolic Logic 41: 747–760, 1976.
Grelling, K., Nelson, L.: Bemerkungen zu den Paradoxien von Russell und Burali-Forti. Abh. der Friesschen Schule, n.s. 2: 301–324, 1908.
Kripke, S.: Outline of a theory of truth. J. Philosophy 72: 690–716, 1975.
Martin, R. (ed.): The paradox of the liar. New Haven, Conn.: 1970.
Montague, R.: Theories incomparable with respect to relative interpretability. J. Symbolic Logic 27: 195–211, 1962.
Moss, J.M.B.: Some B. Russell’s sprouts, In W. Hodges (ed.), Conference in mathematical logic. Springer Lecture Notes in Math. 255, Berlin: Springer, 1972.
Quine, W.V.O.: New foundations for mathematical logic. Amer. Math. Monthly 44: 70–80, 1937. Reprinted in Quine (53).
Ramsey, F.P.: The foundations of mathematics. Proc. London Math. Soc. 25: 338–384, 1926. Also in The foundations of mathematics and other essays. New York 1931.
Russell, B.: On some difficulties in the theory of transfinite numbers and other types. Proc. London Math. Soc. 4: 29–53, 1906.
Rüstow, A.: Der Lügner: Theorie, Geschichte und Auflösung, Leipzig: 1910.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krajewski, S. (1981). Antinomies. In: Marciszewski, W. (eds) Dictionary of Logic as Applied in the Study of Language. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1253-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1253-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8257-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1253-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive