Abstract
According to current cognitive theories, classic dyslexia is caused by a deficit in phonological processing. Different orthographies represent different ways of realizing the phonological properties of a language. German orthography represents the relationships between phonemes and graphemes in a much more consistent and transparent fashion than English orthography with its many exceptional and irregular spellings. The present study compared the word and nonword reading abilities of 12 year old English and German speaking dyslexic children. A word and a nonword reading task was developed which allowed a direct comparison of the two language groups. One, two and three syllable words which are similar in English and German and corresponding nonwords were presented. While the consistency of German orthography allows dyslexic chidren to acquire considerable though not sufficient knowledge about the relationships between spoken and written words, the complexity of English orthography poses an additional problem for dyslexic children. German dyslexics read slowly but accurately, while English dyslexics showed low reading accuracy and low reading speed. Word frequency, item length and lexicality had a stronger influence on English dyslexics’ performance than on performance of the German chidren.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Elliot, C.D., Murray, D.J., & Pearson, L.S. (1983). British ability scales: Word reading. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-NELSON Publishing Company Ltd.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface Dyslexia (pp. 301–330 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jorm, A.E. & Share, D.L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholoinguistics, 4, 104–147.
Landed, K., Wimmer, H., & Moser, E. (1996). Salzburger Lese-and Rechtschreibtest (Salzburg reading and spelling test). Unpublished manuscript, University of Salzburg
Perfetti, C. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition, (pp. 145–174 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29–53.
Raven, J.C. (1987). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales, Section 3. Standard Progressive Matrices. London, UK: H.K. Lewis & Co. Ltd.
Stanovich, K.E. (1994). Annotation: Does dyslexia exist? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 579–595.
Thomdike, E.L. & Lorge, L. (1944). The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.
Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 80–90.
Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landerl, K. (1997). Word Recognition in English and German Dyslexics: A Direct Comparison. In: Leong, C.K., Joshi, R.M. (eds) Cross-Language Studies of Learning to Read and Spell. NATO ASI Series, vol 87. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1197-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1197-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4810-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1197-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive