Abstract
In what follows I wish to reconsider certain ideas to be found in Post’s (1971) defence of the ‘retentionist’ or ‘accumulativist’ view of science. In particular I shall focus on heuristics and methodology and will confine the discussion to physics, specifically to theories of dynamics (this, I hazard, is to be counted a constraint in principle: it seems unlikely that similar considerations will apply to any other branch of empirical science). Post’s thesis (what he calls the “generalized principle of correspondence”) is both historical and methodological; it may be simply put as the claim that what is taken over from preceding theories is not only those laws and experimental facts which are well-confirmed, but also ‘patterns’ and ‘internal connections’, that in this way the successor theory accounts for whatever success its precursor enjoyed, for it “… will in fact embody a good deal of the (lower) theoretical structure of the [precursor] theory.” (1971, p. 229).
Dedicated to Heinz Post on the occasion of his 75th birthday.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bacry, H. (1988), Localizability and Space in Quantum Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 308, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Beltrametti, E.G., and Cassinelli, G. (1981), The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading.
Berry, M. (1991), ‘Asymptotics, Singularities and the Reduction of Theories’ in D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, and D. Westerstähl (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Logic, Mathematics, and Philosophy of Science, Uppsala, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Boyd, R. (1973), `Realism, Underdetermination, and a Causal Theory of Evidence’, Noûs, 7, pp. 1–12.
Cao, T. and Schweber, S. (1993), `The Conceptual Foundations and Philosophical Aspects of Renormalization Theory’, Synthese, forthcoming.
Dijksterhuis, E.J. (1961), The Mechanization of the World Picture, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Feyerabend, P.K. (1968), `How to be a Good Empiricist’ in P.H. Nidditch (ed.), The Philosophy of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Field, H. (1972), `Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference’, Journal of Philosophy, 70, pp. 462–81.
Glauber, R. (1963), `Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field’, Physical Review, 131, pp. 2766–88.
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hardin, C.L. (1988), Color for Philosophers, Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis.
Heisenberg, W. (1925), `Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanis-cher Beziehungen’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 33, pp. 879–93. English translation in Van der Waerden (1967).
Hooker, C. (1975–1979), The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics,Vols. 1 & 2, University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, University of Western Ontario, London.
Inonu, E., and Wigner, E.P. (1953), `On the Contraction of Groups and their Representations’, Proceedings National Academy of Science, 39, pp. 510–24.
Kripke, S. (1980), Naming and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.
Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Laudan, L. (1981), `A Confutation of Convergent Realism’, Philosophy of Science, 48, pp. 19–48
Mackey, G.W. (1963), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin/Cummings, Reading.
McMullin, E. (1984), `A Case for Scientific Realism’ in J. Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Mickens, R.E. (1990), Mathematics and Science, World Scientific, Singapore.
Newton-Smith, W. (1981), The Rationality of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston.
Post, H. (1971), `Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: In Praise of Conservative Induction’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2, pp. 213–55.
Putnam, H. (1962), `The Analytic and the Synthetic’ in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 3, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Reprinted in Philosophical Papers, Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Putnam, H. (1973), `Explanation and Reference’ in G. Pearce and P. Maynard (eds.), Conceptual Change, D. Reidel, Dordrecht. Reprinted in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Putnam, H. (1975), `The Meaning of `Meaning“ in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, VII, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Reprinted in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Putnam, H. (1978), Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston.
Putnam, H. (1990), `Is Water Necessarily H2O?’ in Realism With a Human Face, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Saunders, S.W. (1988), `The Algebraic Approach to Quantum Field Theory’ in H. Brown and R. Harré (eds.), The Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory,Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Saunders, S.W. and Brown, H. (1991), `Reflections on Ether’ in S. W. Saunders and H. Brown (eds.), The Philosophy of Vacuum, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Scheffler, I. (1966), Science and Subjectivity, Hacking Publishing Co., Indianapolis.
Shapere, D. (1969), `Towards a Post-Positivist Interpretation of Science’ in P. Achinstein and S. Barker (eds.), The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Baltimore.
Stein, H. (1981), “Subtler Forms of Matter’ in the Period Following Maxwell’ in G.N. Cantor and M.J.S. Hodge (eds.), Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories, 1740–1900, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Steiner, M. (1989), `The Application of Mathematics to Natural Science’, The Journal of Philosophy, 76, pp. 449–80.
Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1963), `Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams’, Physics Review Letters, 10, pp. 277–9.
Sudarshan, E.C.G. and Mukunda, N. (1974), Classical Dynamics: A Modern Perspective, John Wiley, New York.
Taylor, P. (1984), The Relationship Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics, D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Torretti, R. (1978), Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Torretti, R. (1983), Relativity and Geometry, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Van Der Waerden, B. (1967), Sources of Quantum Mechanics, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Varadarajan, V. (1968), Geometry of Quantum Theory, Vol. 1, Van Nostrand, Princeton.
Varadarajan, V. (1970), Geometry of Quantum Theory, Vol. 2, Van Nostrand, Princeton.
Watkins, J. (1978), `Corroboration and the Problem of Content-Comparison’ in G. Radnitzky and G. Anderson (eds.), Progress and Rationality in Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Woodhouse, N. (1980), Geometric Quantization, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Zahar, E. (1980), `Einstein, Meyerson and the Role of Mathematics in Physical Discovery’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 31, pp. 1–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saunders, S. (1993). To What Physics Corresponds. In: French, S., Kamminga, H. (eds) Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 148. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1185-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1185-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4229-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1185-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive