Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a differential geometric framework for the analysis of individual choice under uncertainty. Since this approach is far from standard, we begin by discussing informally how choice can be geometrised, and why we believe the approach has value.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allais, M. (1952). Fondements d’une theorie positive des choix. Econometric, 40, 257–332.
Amari, S-i. (1984). Differential-geometric methods in statistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Atkinson, C. and Mitchell, A. F. (1981). Rao’s distance measure. Sankya, 43A, 345365.
Barnsdorf, N. O. (1978). Information and exponential families in statistical theory. New York: Wiley.
Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981.
Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and the evaluation of corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–653.
Becker, J. and Sarin, R. (1988). Lottery dependent utility. University of California at Los Angeles working paper.
Camerer, C. (1988). An experimental test of several generalised utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, forthcoming.
Cass, D. and Stiglitz, J. (1970). The structure of investor preferences and asset return separability. Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 122–160.
Centsov, N. N. (1972). Statistical decision rules and optimal inference. Rhode Island: A.M.S.
Chew, S. H. (1983). A generalization of the quasi-linear mean, etc. Econometrica, 51, 1065–1092.
Chew, S. H. and Macrimmon, K. (1979). Alpha-nu utility theory, etc. University of British Columbia working paper No. 686.
Choquet-Bruhat, Y., Dewitt-Morette, C. and Dallard-Bleik, M. (1977). Analysis, manifolds and physics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dawid, A. F. (1975). Discussion to Efron’s paper. Annual Statistics, 3, 1231–1234. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dekel, E. (1987). Asset demands without the independence axiom. University of California at Berkeley mimeograph 1–10.
Efron, B. (1975). Defining the curvature of a statistical problem. Annual Statistics, 3, 1189–1242.
Grinblatt, M. and Johnson, H. (1988). A put option paradox. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
Fishburn, P. C. (1984). SSB utility theory, etc. Mathematical Social Sciences, 8, 253–285.
Gardiner, C. W. (1985). Handbook of stochastic methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kahneman, D. and Twersky, A. (1979). Pospect theory. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. Kramers, H. A. (1940). Physica, 7, 284–285.
Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1986). Disappointment and dynamic choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 271–282.
Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory. Economic Journal, 92, 805–824. Lighthill, M. J. (1978). Fourier analysis and generalised functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Machina, M. (1984). The economic theory of individual behavior towards risk, etc. Working paper.
Machina. M. (1982). Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica, 50, 277–323.
Marschak, J. (1950). Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility. Econometrica, 18, 111–141.
Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio selection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Moyal, J. E. (1949). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 11, 151–171.
Pawula, R. F. (1967). Approximation of the linear Boltzmann equation by the Fokker-Planck equation. Physical Review, 162, 186–188.
Pfanzagl, J. (1982). Contributions of a general asymptotic statistical theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisations, 3, 323–343.
Rao, C. R. (1945). Information and accuracy. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 37, 81–91.
Roell, A. (1985). Risk aversion in Yaari’s model. L.S. E. mimeograph No. 1–16. Ross, S. (1978). Mutual fund separation in financial theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 17, 254–286.
Russell, T. (1988A). Risk aversion and asset diversification for general preferences. Santa Clara University mimeograph.
Russell, T. (1988B). Schwartz distributions resolve the put paradox. Santa Clara University mimeograph.
Russell, T. (1988C). Tricks with Engel curves. Santa Clara University mimeograph.
Russell, T. (1988D). Continuous time portfolio theory and the Schwartz-Sobolev theory of distributions. Operations Research Letters, 7, 159–162.
Samuelson, P. A. (1965). Rational theory of warrant pricing. Industrial Management Review, 6, 13–69.
Samuelson, P. A. (1983). Foundations of economic analysis: Enlarged edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Sato, R. (1981). Theory of technical change and economic invariance. New York: Academic Press.
Sato, R. and Ramachandran, R. (1989). Symmetry and conservation: An introduction. Symmetry and conservation laws: With applications to economics and finance. Boston: Klewer Academic Press.
Spivak, M. (1977). A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. Boston: Publish or Perish Press.
Weber, M. and Camerer, C. (1987). Recent developments in modelling preferences under risk O. R. Spectrum9, 129–151
Yaari. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95–115.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russell, T. (1990). Choice as Geometry. In: Sato, R., Ramachandran, R.V. (eds) Conservation Laws and Symmetry: Applications to Economics and Finance. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1145-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1145-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5786-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1145-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive