The Process of Conflict Escalation and Roles of Third Parties

  • Friedrich Glasl

Abstract

Theory and practice of conflict handling by third parties present various approaches for the resolution of conflicts—for example, judicial conflict solving, arbitration, conciliation, mediation, good services, power intervention, process consultation, and so forth (Fisher, 1972; Young, 1972; La Tour et al., 1976; and Prein, 1976, 1979a). Many of these approaches may be compared and evaluated to arrive at some conclusions on the use of specific conflict-handling models for different kinds of social conflicts and different degrees of intensity of conflicts. However, what are different degrees of intensity? Which approach is appropriate for which degree of escalation? To answer these questions, this paper will present a model of escalation of social conflicts within organizations. The model of escalation describes various mechanisms at work and distinguishes nine different stages of escalation. Different strategies of conflict handling then are related to these nine different stages of escalation, and the relative value of conflict-handling interventions is discussed in light of the nine stages of escalation. The evaluation of these approaches suggests that all of them do have limited use and effect for specific stages but must be applied according to the degree of intensity of conflict.

Keywords

Conflict Resolution Process Consultation Social Conflict Power Intervention Conflict Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyle, M. 1975. Bodily Communication. London: International University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Assagioli, R. 1971. Psychosynthesis. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Assagioli, R. 1973. The Act of Will. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Aubert, V. 1963. “Competition and Dissensus: Two Types of Conflict and of Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 7:26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckhard, R. 1969. “The Confrontation Meeting.” In W. Bennis, K. Benne, and R. Chin, eds., The Planning of Change. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Blake, R., and J. S. Mouton. 1961. “Comprehension of Own and of Outgroup Positions under Intergroup Competition.” Journal of Conflict Resolution: 304–9.Google Scholar
  7. Blake, R., and J. S. Mouton. 1962. “The Influence of Competitively Vested Interests on Judgments.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 6:149–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blake, R., H. A. Shepard, and J. S. Mouton. 1964. Managing Intergroup Conflict in Industry. Houston: Gulf.Google Scholar
  9. Boszormenyi-Nagy, J., and J. L. Framo. 1965. Intensive Family Therapy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Boulding, K. E. 1957. “Organization and Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1:122–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bugental, D. E., J. W. Kaswan, and L. R. Love. 1970. “Perception of Contradictory Meanings Conveyed by Verbal and Nonverbal Channels.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16:647–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burton, J. W. 1969. Conflict and Communication. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Chase, S. 1951. Roads to Agreement. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cofer, C. N., and M. H. Appley. 1964. Motivation: Theory and Research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Daim, W. 1962 “Das Bild des Feindes.” Der Christ in der Welt: 124–32.Google Scholar
  16. Deutsch, K. 1968. “Threats and Deterrence as Mixed-Motive Games.” The Analysis of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Deutsch, M. 1973. The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deutsch, M., and R. M. Krauss. 1962. “Studies of Interpersonal Bargaining.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 6:52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diesig, P. 1961. “Bargaining Strategy and Union-Management Relationships.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 5:369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Douglas, A. 1957. “The Peaceful Settlement of Industrial and Intergroup Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1:69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eiseman, J. W. 1978. “Reconciling ‘Incompatible Positions.’ ” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 11:133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekman, P., and W. V. Friesen. 1969. “Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception.” Psychiatry 31:88–105.Google Scholar
  23. Ephron, L. R. 1961. “Group Conflict in Organizations: A Critical Appraisal of Recent Theories.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 6:53–72.Google Scholar
  24. Filley, A. C, 1975. Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman,Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, R. J. 1972. “Third-Party Consultation: A Method for the Study and Resolution of Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 16:67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frei, D. 1970. Kriegsverhütung und Friedenssicherung. Frauenfeld.Google Scholar
  27. Galtung, J. 1973. “Institutionalisierte Konfliktlösung.” In W. L. Bühl, ed., Strategie des Konfliktes. Munich, pp. 113–77.Google Scholar
  28. Garfinkel, H. 1974 “Bedingungen für den Erfolg von Degradierungszeremonien.” Gruppendynamik (April).Google Scholar
  29. Gelner, C. 1967. Die Kunst des Verhandeins. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  30. Glasl, F. 1969. “Techniken der Konfliktlösung.” Der Christ in der Welt (September).Google Scholar
  31. Glasl, F. 1972. “Methods of Conflict-Solving.” Seminar Papers of NPI, Zeist/Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  32. Glasl, F. 1980. Konfliktmanagement: Diagnose und Behandlung von Konflikten in Organisationen. Bern.Google Scholar
  33. Goffman, E. 1955. “On Face-Work.” Psychiatry 18:211–31.Google Scholar
  34. Guetzkow, H., and J. Gyr. 1954. “An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups.” Human Relations 7:367–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harrison, R. 1971. “Role Negotiation: A Tough Minded Approach to Team Development.” In W. Burke and H. Hornstein, eds., The Social Technology of Organization Development, San Francisco: University Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Hentig, H. von. 1965. Der Friedensschluss. Munich.Google Scholar
  37. Herman, C. F. 1973. International Crisis: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Herman, S. M., and M. Korenich. 1977. Authentic Management: A Gestalt Orientation to Organizations and Their Development. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  39. Hoesel, A. F. G. van. 1957. Zindelijk denken. Bilthoven/Antwerpen.Google Scholar
  40. Holsti, O. R. 1970. “Individual Differences in ‘Definition of the Situation.’ ” Journal of Conflict Resolution 14:303–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holsti, O. R., R. A. Brody, and R. C. North. 1964. “Measuring Effect and Action in International Reaction Models: Empirical Materials from the 1962 Cuban Crisis.” Journal of Peace Research 7:170–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Janis, I. L. 1972. Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  43. Kahn, H. 1965. On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New York.Google Scholar
  44. Kautsky, J. H. 1965. “Myth, Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, and Symbolic Reassurance in the East-West Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 9:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelman, H. C. 1972. “The Problem-Solving Workshop in Conflict Resolution.” In R. L. Merritt, ed., Communication in International Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  46. La Tour, S., et al. 1976. “Some Determinants of Preference for Models of Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 20:319–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. March, J. G., and H. A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Margerison, Ch., and M. Leary. 1975. Managing Industrial Conflicts: The Mediator’s Role. Bradford, U.K.Google Scholar
  49. Mastenbroek, W. F. G. 1979. “Conflicthantering: een procesbenadering.” M & O, Tijdschrift voor organisatiekunde en sociaal beleid (Jan/Feb):69–89.Google Scholar
  50. Mehrabian, A. 1972. Nonverbal Communication. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  51. Milburn, Th. W. 1977. “The Nature of Threat.” Journal of Social Issues 33:126–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newcomb, T. R. 1947. “Autistic Hostility and Social Reality.” Human Relations 7:69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paige, G. D. 1969. The Korean Decision. New York.Google Scholar
  54. Perls, F. 1975. Legacy from Fritz. Palo Alto, Calif.: Science & Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  55. Peters, E. 1952. Conciliation in Action. New London, Conn.Google Scholar
  56. Peters, E. 1955. Strategy and Tactics in Labor Negotiations. New London, Conn.Google Scholar
  57. Pondy, L. R. 1967. “Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Methods.” Administrative Science Quarterly 72:296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Prein, H. C. M. 1979a. “Rollen van een derde partij bij conflicthantering.” M & O, Tijdschrift voor organisatiekunde en sociaal beleid (Jan/Feb): 100–24.Google Scholar
  59. Prein, H. C. M. 1979b. “De rol van procesbegeleider.” M & O, Tijdschrift voor organisatiekunde en sociaal beleid (Jan/Feb): 125–34.Google Scholar
  60. Prein, H. C. M. 1979c. “De rol van bemiddelaar.” M & O, Tijdschrift voor organisatiekunde en sociaal beleid (Jan/Feb): 135–44.Google Scholar
  61. Proxmire, W. 1970. Report from Wasteland. New York.Google Scholar
  62. Rapoport, A. 1972. “Kataklysmische und strategische Konfliktmodelle.” In W. Bühl, ed., Strategie des Konfliktes. Munich.Google Scholar
  63. Rapoport, A. 1974. Conflict in Man-Made Environment. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. Rathjens, G. W. 1969. “The Dynamics of the Arms Race.” Scientific American 15–25.Google Scholar
  65. Rehmus, Ch. M. 1953. “Mediation and Conciliation.” Labor Law Journal 4:141–44.Google Scholar
  66. Richter, H. E. 1967. Eltern, Kind und Neurose. Reinbek bei Hamburg.Google Scholar
  67. Richter, H. E. 1972. Patient Familie. Reinbek bei Hamburg.Google Scholar
  68. Rocheblave-Spenlé, A. M. 1973. Psychologie des Konflikts. Freiburg.Google Scholar
  69. Rother, W. 1976. Die Kunst des Streitens. Munich.Google Scholar
  70. Schelling, Th. C. 1957. “Bargaining, Communication and Limited War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 7:19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Senghaas, D. 1970. “Bedrohungs vor Stellungen und Drohstrategien in den internationalen Beziehungen, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Abschreckungspolitik.” In Papiere des Kolloquiums “Bedrohvorstellungen als Faktor der internationalen Politik” der Arbeitsgemeinschaf t für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Munich.Google Scholar
  72. Senghaas, D. 1971. Aggressivität und kollektive Gewalt. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  73. Sherif, M., ed. 1962. Intergroup Relations and Leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Siemens Autorenteam. 1974. Organisationsplanung. Munich.Google Scholar
  75. Thelen, H. 1954. Dynamics of Groups at Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Thierry, Hk. 1977. Organisatie van tegenstellingen. Assen/Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  77. Thomas, K. 1976. “Conflict and Conflict/Management.” In M. D. Dunnette, ed., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  78. Walton, R. E. 1969. Interpersonal Peacemaking: Confrontations and Third-Party Consultations. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  79. Watzlawick, P., J. H. Beavin, and D. D. Jackson. 1968. Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  80. White, R. K. 1965. “Images in the Context of International Conflict: Soviet Perceptions of the U.S. and the U.S.S.R.” In H. C. Kelman, ed., International Behavior. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  81. White, R. K. 1966. “Misperception as a Cause of Two World Wars.” Journal of Social Issues 22:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wright, Q. 1965. “The Escalation of International Conflicts.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 9:434–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Young, O. 1972. “Intermediaries: Additional Thoughts on Third Parties.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 16:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friedrich Glasl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations