Abstract
This chapter illustrates the value of international collaboration. The research, which originated in Israel, arose from a study aiming to enhance teachers’ awareness of their pupils’ thinking processes by exposing them to cognitive theories and to authentic Problematic Learning Situations (PLS). For that purpose, we detected and analysed PLS and used them as video clips in a yearly course for pre- and in-service junior high school teachers. The universality of these learning situations was then pilot-tested across cultures. We provided some of the material on difficulties in geometry to U.K. students training to be elementary school teachers in an effort to learn how these materials affect student teachers in a different country. We were interested in the value of using these materials, differences in Israeli and British reactions to the materials, and the feasibility of conducting such a collaboration. The findings show that viewing the Israeli video clips triggered a change in the U.K. students’ reactions to teaching episodes: it was the first time they took the pupil’s side rather than the teacher’s. However, the findings also show that the dominant influence on the responses of both groups of student teachers (from Israel and the U.K.) was the content of the course in which the video clips were presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications ( 4th ed. ). New York: Freeman.
Carpenter, T. P. and Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17, 457–470.
Clemson, D. and Clemson, W. (1994). Mathematics in the early years. London: Routledge.
Close, G. S. (1982). Children’s understanding of angle at primary/secondary transfer stage. London: Polytechnic of the Southbank.
Cockburn, A. D. (1999). Teaching mathematics with insight. London: Falmer Press.
Desforges, C. and Cockburn, A. (1987). Understanding the mathematics teacher. Lewes: Falmer Press.
DIEE (1999a). The national numeracy strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (produced for the Department of Education and Employment).
DfEE (1999b). The national numeracy strategy: Mathematical vocabulary. London: BEAM (produced for the Department of Education and Employment).
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. London: Fontana.
Fischbein, E. and Nachlieli,T. (1998). Concepts and figures in geometrical reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (10), 1193–1211.
Gal, H. (1998a). What do they really think? What students think about the median and bisector of an angle in the triangle, what they say and what their teachers know about it. In A. Olivier and K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22n d Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 321–328 ). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.
Gal, H. (1998b). Pre-service teachers’ difficulties in geometry instruction. The case of the angle. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute (Hebrew).
Gal, H. and Linchevski, L. (2000). When a learning situation becomes a problematic learning situation: The case of diagonals in the quadrangle. In T. Nakahara and M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24m Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 297–304 ). Hiroshima, Japan: University of Hiroshima.
Gal, H. and Vinner, S. (1997). Perpendicular lines — What is the problem? Pre-service teachers’ lack of knowledge on how to cope with students’ difficulties. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21’ Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 281–288 ). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.
Haylock, D. and Cockburn, A. (1997). Understanding mathematics in the lower primary years. London: Chapman.
Hershkowitz, R. (1987). The acquisition of concepts and misconcepts in basic geometry - or when “a little learning is a dangerous thing”. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (Vol. 3, pp. 238251 ). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hoffer, A. (1983). Van Hiele-based research. In R. Lesh and M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 205–227 ). New York: Academic Press.
Marshall, H. H. (1988). Work or learning: Implications of classroom metaphors. Educational Researcher, 17 (9), 9–16.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwartz, J. L., Yerushalmy, M. and Wilson, B. (1993). The geometric supposer. What is it a case of? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skemp, R. R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics. Harmondsworth: Pengu in Books.
Stavy, R., Tirosh, D. and Tsamir, P. (1997). Intuitive rules and comparison tasks: The grasp of vertical angles. In G. A. Makrides (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Mediterranean Conference (pp. 269–276 ). Nicosia, Cyprus.
Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65–81 ). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Vinner, S. (1997). From intuition to inhibition. Mathematics, education and other endangered species. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21’ Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 63–78 ). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gal, H., Linchevski, L., Cockburn, A. (2003). Sharing Teacher Training Methods. In: Peter-Koop, A., Santos-Wagner, V., Breen, C., Begg, A. (eds) Collaboration in Teacher Education. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1072-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1072-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6327-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1072-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive