Skip to main content

Sharing Teacher Training Methods

The Case of Problematic Learning Situations in Geometry

  • Chapter
Collaboration in Teacher Education

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teacher Education ((MTEN,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the value of international collaboration. The research, which originated in Israel, arose from a study aiming to enhance teachers’ awareness of their pupils’ thinking processes by exposing them to cognitive theories and to authentic Problematic Learning Situations (PLS). For that purpose, we detected and analysed PLS and used them as video clips in a yearly course for pre- and in-service junior high school teachers. The universality of these learning situations was then pilot-tested across cultures. We provided some of the material on difficulties in geometry to U.K. students training to be elementary school teachers in an effort to learn how these materials affect student teachers in a different country. We were interested in the value of using these materials, differences in Israeli and British reactions to the materials, and the feasibility of conducting such a collaboration. The findings show that viewing the Israeli video clips triggered a change in the U.K. students’ reactions to teaching episodes: it was the first time they took the pupil’s side rather than the teacher’s. However, the findings also show that the dominant influence on the responses of both groups of student teachers (from Israel and the U.K.) was the content of the course in which the video clips were presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications ( 4th ed. ). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P. and Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17, 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemson, D. and Clemson, W. (1994). Mathematics in the early years. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Close, G. S. (1982). Children’s understanding of angle at primary/secondary transfer stage. London: Polytechnic of the Southbank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A. D. (1999). Teaching mathematics with insight. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desforges, C. and Cockburn, A. (1987). Understanding the mathematics teacher. Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIEE (1999a). The national numeracy strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (produced for the Department of Education and Employment).

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE (1999b). The national numeracy strategy: Mathematical vocabulary. London: BEAM (produced for the Department of Education and Employment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. and Nachlieli,T. (1998). Concepts and figures in geometrical reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (10), 1193–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, H. (1998a). What do they really think? What students think about the median and bisector of an angle in the triangle, what they say and what their teachers know about it. In A. Olivier and K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22n d Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 321–328 ). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, H. (1998b). Pre-service teachers’ difficulties in geometry instruction. The case of the angle. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, H. and Linchevski, L. (2000). When a learning situation becomes a problematic learning situation: The case of diagonals in the quadrangle. In T. Nakahara and M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24m Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 297–304 ). Hiroshima, Japan: University of Hiroshima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, H. and Vinner, S. (1997). Perpendicular lines — What is the problem? Pre-service teachers’ lack of knowledge on how to cope with students’ difficulties. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21’ Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 281–288 ). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haylock, D. and Cockburn, A. (1997). Understanding mathematics in the lower primary years. London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R. (1987). The acquisition of concepts and misconcepts in basic geometry - or when “a little learning is a dangerous thing”. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (Vol. 3, pp. 238251 ). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, A. (1983). Van Hiele-based research. In R. Lesh and M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 205–227 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. H. (1988). Work or learning: Implications of classroom metaphors. Educational Researcher, 17 (9), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. L., Yerushalmy, M. and Wilson, B. (1993). The geometric supposer. What is it a case of? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics. Harmondsworth: Pengu in Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., Tirosh, D. and Tsamir, P. (1997). Intuitive rules and comparison tasks: The grasp of vertical angles. In G. A. Makrides (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Mediterranean Conference (pp. 269–276 ). Nicosia, Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65–81 ). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. (1997). From intuition to inhibition. Mathematics, education and other endangered species. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21’ Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 63–78 ). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gal, H., Linchevski, L., Cockburn, A. (2003). Sharing Teacher Training Methods. In: Peter-Koop, A., Santos-Wagner, V., Breen, C., Begg, A. (eds) Collaboration in Teacher Education. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1072-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1072-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6327-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1072-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics