Abstract
We undertake to argue in favor of generalizing the formal concept of probability by replacing the usual quantitative formulation by the hitherto largely ignored comparative formulation. The theory of comparative probability (CP) is a theory of statements of the forms ‘event A is more probable than event B’, ‘events A, B are equally probable’, ‘event A is at least as probable as event B’, having the respective symbolic representations, ‘A > B’, ‘A ~ B’, ‘A ≳ B’. Comparative probability seems to have first been studied by Bernstein (1917), Keynes (1921), de Finetti (1931), and Koopman (1940). The modern era of CP studies perhaps dates from the work of Carnap (1950), Savage (1954), and Kraft et al. (1959). Relatively recent contributors include Scott (1964), Luce (1967, 1968), Fishburn (1970, 1975), Domotor (1969), Fine (1971a, b, 1973), Fine and Gill (1976), Fine and Kaplan (1976), Kaplan (1971, 1974), and Narins (1974).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bernoulli, J.: 1713 (Translated 1966), Ars Conjectandt-part IV, Dept. of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Bernstein, S. N.: 1917 (Reprinted 1964 ), ‘Axiomatic Foundations of Probability Theory’, Collected Works IV, Academy of Science, USSR, 10–25.
Carnap, R.: 1950 ( 2nd Ed. 1962), Logical Foundations of Probability, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 428–462.
Domotor, Z.: 1969, Probabilistic Relational Structures and Their Applications, Tech. Rep. 144, Inst. for Math. Studies in Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford.
Fine, T. L.: 1970, On the Apparent Convergence of Relative Frequency and Its Implications’, IEEE Trans. on Information Theory IT-16, 251–257.
Fine, T. L.: 1971a, ‘A Note on the Existence of Quantitative Probability’, Ann. Math. Stat. 42, 1182–1186.
Fine, T. L.: 1971b, ‘Rational Decision Making with Comparative Probability’, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control Miami Beach 1971, Dept. of Elec. Eng. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 355–356.
Fine, T. L.: 1973, Theories of Probability, Academic Press, New York, pp. 15–57.
Fine, T. L.: 1974, ‘Towards a Revised Probabilistic Basis for Quantum Mechanics,’ Synthese 29, 187–201.
Fine, T. L. and J. T. Gill: 1976, ‘The Enumeration of Comparative Probability Relations’, Ann. Probability, to appear.
Fine, T. L. and M. A. Kaplan: 1976, ‘Joint Orders in Comparative Probability’, to appear Ann. Probability.
Finetti, B. de: 1931, ‘Sul Significato Soggettivo della Probabilita’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 31, 298–329.
Fishburn, P. C.: 1970, Utility Theory for Decision Making, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 193–201.
Fishburn, P. C.: 1975 ‘Weak Comparative Probability on Infinite Sets’, Ann. of Probability 3, 889–893.
Gillies, D.: 1973, An Objective Theory of Probability, Methuen, London.
Hacking, I.: 1965, Logic of Statistical Inference, Cambridge Univ. Press, London and New York, 1–53.
Kaplan, M. A.: 1971, Independence in Comparative Probability, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., M.S. thesis.
Kaplan, M. A.: 1974, Extensions and Limits of Comparative Probability Orders, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Ph.D. thesis.
Keynes, J. M.: 1921 (Reprinted 1962), A Treatise on Probability, Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., New York.
Koopman, B.: 1940, ‘The Bases of Probability’, Bull, Amer. Math. Soc. 46, 763–774.
Kraft, C., Pratt, J., and Seidenberg, A.: 1959, ‘Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets’, Ann. Math. Stat. 30, 408–419.
Krantz, D., R. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky: 1971, Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I, Academic Press, New York, 199–244.
Luce, R. D.: 1967, ‘Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of a Finitely Additive Probability Measure’, Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 780–786.
Luce, R. D.: 1968, ‘On The Numerical Representation of Quantitative Conditional Probability’, Ann. Math. Stat. 39, 481–491.
Narens, L.: 1974, ‘Minimal Conditions for Additive Conjoint Measurement and Quantitative Probability’, J. Math. Psychology. 11.
Roberts, F. S.: 1973, ‘A Note on Fine’s Axioms for Quantitative Probability’, Ann. Probability, 484–487.
Salmon, W.: 1966, The Foundations of Scientific Inference, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Savage, L. J.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 34–36.
Scott, D.: 1964,. Measurement Structures and Linear Inequalities, J. Math. Psychology 1, 233–247.
Villegas, C.: 1964, ‘On Qualitative Probability o--Algebras’, Ann. Math. Stat. 35, 1787–1796.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fine, T.L. (1977). An Argument for Comparative Probability. In: Butts, R.E., Hintikka, J. (eds) Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0837-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0837-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8350-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0837-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive