Skip to main content

Weed Management in Low-External-Input and Organic Farming Systems

  • Chapter

Abstract

During the past quarter century, growing numbers of government policy makers, scientists, consumers, and farmers have expressed concerns over the impacts of conventional farming practices on environmental quality, human health, and the economic viability of farm families and rural communities. Particularly in western Europe, and to a certain extent in the USA, Canada, and other countries, these concerns have begun to translate into changes in public policy, research priorities, and market opportunities that favor the development of low-external-input (LEI) and organic farming systems. For example, during the 1980s in Sweden, a >50% reduction in agricultural pesticide use was mandated and achieved through coordinated sets of regulations, research and extension education activities, and economic incentives (Bellinder et al., 1994; Matteson, 1995). Similar approaches have been initiated in other European countries (Matteson, 1995). Concurrently, consumer demand for organic crop and livestock products has grown 20 to 25% per annum in the USA, many European countries, and Japan (Geier, 1998; Myers and Rorie, 2001). Sales of organic products in 2000 were estimated at $7.8 billion in the USA (Myers and Rorie, 2001) and at least $7.5 billion in Europe and the UK (Soil Association, 2001). Continued growth is expected in the amount of land managed with LEI and organic methods and in associated economic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham C.T., Singh S.P. Weed management in sorghum-legume intercropping systems. J Agric Sci, Cambridge 1984; 103: 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkämper J., Pessios E., Long D.V. Einfluss der Düngung auf die Entwicklung and Nahrstoffaufnahme verschiedener Unkräuter in Mais. Proceedings of the 3rd European Weed Research Society Symposium, Mainz, Germany, 1979; pp. 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. Timing of nitrogen application affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) growth in winter wheat. Weed Tech 1991; 5: 582–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angonin C., Caussanel J.P., Meynard J.M. Competition between winter wheat and Veronica hederifolia: influence of weed density and the amount and timing of nitrogen application. Weed Res 1996; 36: 175187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascard J. Effects of flame weeding on weed species at different developmental stages. Weed Res 1995; 35: 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball D.A., Wysocki D.J., Chastain T.G. Nitrogen application timing effects on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield. Weed Tech 1996; 10:305–310. Barrett S.C.H. Crop mimicry in weeds. Econ Bot 1983; 37: 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin J.M., Baskin C.C. “Physiology of dormancy and germination in relation to seed bank ecology.” In Ecology of Soil Seed Banks, M.A. Leck, V.T. Parker, R.L. Simpson, eds. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1989; pp. 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaans L., Kropff M.J., Goudriaan J., van Laar H.H. Design of weed management systems with a reduced reliance on herbicides poses new challenges and prerequisites for modeling crop-weed interactions. Field Crops Res 2000; 67: 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaans L., Kropff M.J., Kempuchetty N., Rajan A., Migo T.R. Can simulation models help design rice cultivars that are more competitive against weeds? Field Crops Res 1997; 51: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann D.T. Competitive suppression of weeds in a leek-celery intercropping system - an exploration of functional biodiversity. Ph.D. thesis, Crop and Weed Ecology Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann D.T., Bastiaans L., Kropff M.J. Effects of intercropping on growth and reproductive capacity of late-emerging Senecio vulgaris L., with special reference to competition for light. Ann Bot 2001; 87: 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann D.T., Kropff M.J., Bastiaans L. Intercropping leeks to suppress weeds. Weed Res 2000; 40: 359374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellinder R.R., Gummesson G., Karlson C. Percentage-driven government mandates for pesticide reduction: the Swedish model. Weed Tech 1994; 5: 545–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti S., Macchia M., Miele S. Quantitative analysis of emergence of seedlings from buried weed seeds with increasing soil depth. Weed Sci 2001; 49: 528–535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw R.E. Rotation affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Tech 1994; 8: 728–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw R.E., Molnar L.J., Chevalier D.F., Lindwall C.W. Factors affecting the operation of the weed-sensing Detectospray system. Weed Sci 1998; 46: 127–131.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boydston R., Hang A. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) green manure crop suppresses weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Tech 1995; 9: 669–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges D.C., Baumann P.A. “Weeds causing losses in the United States.” In Crop Losses Due to Weeds in the United States: 1992, D.C. Bridges, P.A. Baumann, eds. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America, 1992; pp. 75–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brust G.E., House G.J. Weed seed destruction by arthropods and rodents in low-input soybean agroecosystems. Amer J Alt Agric 1988; 3: 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhler D.D., Kohler K.A., Thompson R.L. Weed seed bank dynamics during a five-year crop rotation. Weed Tech 2001; 15: 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulson H.A.J., Snaydon R.W., Stopes C.E. Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic fanning system. J Agric Sci, Cambridge 1997; 128: 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardina J., Norquay H.M., Stinner B.R., McCartney D.A. Postdispersal predation of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Sci 1996; 44: 534–539.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chastain T.G., Ward K.J., Wysocki D.J. Seedbed residue and seed size relationships in winter barley. Agron J 1995a; 87: 517–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chastain T.G., Ward K.J., Wysocki D.J. Stand establishment responses of soft white winter wheat to seedbed residue and seed size. Crop Sci 1995b; 35: 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikoye D., Weise S.F., Swanton C.J. Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci 1995; 43: 375–380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clay S.A., Aguilar I. Weed seedbanks and corn growth following continuous corn or alfalfa. Agron J 1998; 90: 813–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin A.E., Erich M.S., Liebman M., Lambert D., Gallandt E.R., Halteman W.A. Effects of red clover (Trifolium pratense) green manure and compost soil amendments on wild mustard (Brassica kaber) growth and incidence of disease. Plant Soil 2002; 238: 245–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conway G.R. Agroecosystem analysis. Agric Admin 1985; 20: 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway G.R., McCraken J.A. “Rapid rural appraisal and agroecosystem analysis.” In Agroecology and Small Farm Development,M.A. Altieri, S.B. Hecht, eds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1990; pp. 221235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R.J., Baker K.F. The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R., Brain P., O’Donovan J.T., O’Sullivan P.A. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci 1987; 354: 720–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R., Mortimer M. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R., Moss S.R. A model of the effects of cultivation on the vertical distribution of weed seeds within the soil. Weed Res 1990; 30: 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covarelli G., Tei F. Effet de la rotation culturale sur la flore adventice du mais. In VIIIer’ Colloque International Sur la Biologie, l’Ecologie et la Systematique des Mauvaises Herbes, Vol. 2. Paris, France: Comite Francais de Lutte Contre les Mauvaises Herbes and Leverkusen, Germany: European Weed Research Society, 1988; pp. 477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromar H.E., Murphy S.D., Swanton C.J. Influence of tillage and crop residue on postdispersal predation of weed seeds. Weed Sci 1999; 47: 184–194.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cussans G.W., Moss S.R. Population dynamics of annual grass weeds. Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference–Weeds, 22–25 November 1982, Brighton, England. Croydon, UK: British Crop Protection Council, 1982; pp. 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cussans G.W., Raudonius S., Brain P., Cumberworth S. Effects of depth of seed burial and soil aggregate size on seedling emergence of Alopecurus myosuroides, Gallium aparine, Stellaria media and wheat. Weed Res 1996; 36: 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dastgheib F. Relative importance of crop seed, manure, and irrigation water as sources of weed infestation. Weed Res 1989; 29: 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A.S., Liebman M. Nitrogen source influences wild mustard growth and competitive effect on sweet corn. Weed Sci 2001; 49: 558–566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca T.H., DeLuca D.K. Composting for feedlot manure management and soil quality. J Prod Agric 1997; 10: 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiTomaso J.M. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci 1995; 43: 491–497.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donald W.W. Timing and frequency of between-row mowing and band-applied herbicide for annual weed control in soybean. Agron J 2000: 92: 1013–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet C., Weaver S.E., Hamill A.S., Zhang J. Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Sci 1999; 47: 729–735.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck E., Liebman M. Soil fertility management as a factor in weed control: the effect of crimson clover residue, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, and their interaction on emergence and early growth of lambsquarters and sweet corn. Plant Soil 1994; 167: 227–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck E., Liebman M., Erich M.S. Crop-weed interference as influenced by a leguminous or synthetic nitrogen source: 1. Doublecropping experiments with crimson clover, sweet corn, and lambsquarters. Agric Ecosyst Env 1995; 56: 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyke G.V., Barnard A.J. Suppression of couchgrass by Italian ryegrass and broad red clover undersown in barley and field beans. J Agric Sci (Cambridge) 1976; 87: 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eghball B., Lesoing G.W. Viability of weed seeds following manure windrow composting. Compost Sci Util 2000; 8: 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entz M.H., Bullied W.J., Katepa-Mupondwa F. Rotational benefits of forage crops in Canadian prairie cropping systems. J Prod Agric 1995; 8: 521–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans R.A., Young J.A. Plant litter and establishment of alien annual weed species in rangeland communities. Weed Sci 1970; 18: 697–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner D.N., Thompson R. Reducing Weed Pressure in Ridge-Till. Bulletin SA-2. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Cooperative Extension, 1992. •

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcella F., Eradat-Oskoui K., Wagner S.W. Application of weed seedbank ecology to low-input weed management. Ecol Appl 1993; 3: 74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcella F., Lindstrom M.J. Movement and germination of weed seeds in ridge-till crop production systems. Weed Sci 1988; 36: 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows G.M., Roeth F.W. Factors influencing shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) seed survival. Weed Sci 1992; 40: 434 440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelberg F.. Proceedings of the 5th Workshop of the European Weed Research Society Working Group on Physical and Cultural Weed Control, 11–13 March 2002, Pisa, Italy. D.C. Cloutier, ed. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada; Institut de Malherbologie, 2002; p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R.H., Piekielek W.P. Fertilizer N equivalence of alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil, and red clover for succeeding corn crops. J Prod Agric 1988; 1: 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamliel A., Stapleton J.J. Improvement of soil solarization with volatile compounds generated from organic amendments. Phytoparasitica 1997; 25 (supplement): 31S - 38S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geier B. The organic market: opportunities and challenges. ILEIA Newletter 1998; 14 (4): 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan S.R., Schwankl W., Lanini W.T. Weed control by subsurface drip irrigation. Calif Agric 1988; 42 (3): 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb P.J. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 1977; 52: 107–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy A.C., Mead A., Bond W. Modeling the effect of weed-seed distribution in the soil profile on seedling emergence. Weed Res 1996; 36: 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy A.C., Green J.M., Lennartsson M. The effect of temperature on the viability of weed seeds in compost. Compost Sci Tech 1998; 6 (3): 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunsolus J.L. Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. Am J Alter Agric 1990; 5: 114119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove W.L., ed. Cover Crops for Clean Water. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzler R.G. Velvet leaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population dynamics following a single year’s seed rain. Weed Tech 1996; 10: 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisel T., Schou J., Christensen S., Andreasen C. Cutting weeds with a CO2 laser. Weed Res 2001; 41: 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J.E., De Datta S.K., Real J.G. “Echinochloa competition in rice: a comparison of studies from direct-seeded and transplanted flooded rice.” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Weed Management, B.A. Auld, R. C. Umaly, S. S. Tjitrosomo, eds. Special Publication No. 38, Bogor, Indonesia: Biotrop, 1990; pp. 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton J.R. The influence of light on the germination of Stellaria media. New Phytol 1983; 94: 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm L.G., Plucknett D.L., Pancho J.V., Herberger J.P. The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center Books, 1977; pp. 450–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan N. Weed prevention: priority research for alternative agriculture. J Prod Agric 1996; 9:485–490. Karlen D.L., Varvel G.E., Bullock D.G., Cruse R.M. Crop rotations for the 21s` century. Adv Agron 1994; 53: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar T.C., Erbach D.C., Cruse R.M. Corn response to seed-row residue removal. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 1990; 54: 1112–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kegode G.O., Forcella F., Clay S. Influence of crop rotation, tillage, and management inputs on weed production. Weed Sci 1999; 47: 175–183.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley A.D., Bruns V.F. Dissemination of weed seeds by irrigation water. Weed Sci 1975; 23: 486–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe W. Effect of weed control on grain yield of different winter barley cultivars with reference to sowing time, seed rate and seed size, in long-term trials at Höfchen and Laacherhof experimental stations (1968–1980). Pflanzenshutz-Nachrichten Bayer 1980; 33: 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster A.T.J, van der Meer L.J., de Jong K.Y., van Haaster A.J.M., Kok B.J., van Aanholt J.T.M. Strategies for effective weed control in the future. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Flower Bulbs, Herzliya, Israel, 10–16 March 1996, H. Lilien-Kipnis, A. Borochov, A.H. Halevy, eds. Acta Horticulturae 1997; 430(II):669–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunelius H.T., Johnston H.W., MacLeod J.A. Effect of undersowing barley with Italian ryegrass or red clover on yield, crop composition and root biomass. Agric Ecosyst Env 1992; 38: 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H.M., Wright G. M., Wilson B.J., Wright K.J. Seedbank persistence of five arable weed species in autumn-sown crops. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Weeds — 1993. Farnham, Surrey, UK: British Crop Protection Council, 1993; pp. 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson H.M., Wiseman J.S. Competition between weeds and transplanted spring cabbage: effects of nitrogen top-dressing. Hort Res 1979; 19: 25–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leishman M.R., Sanbrooke K.J., Woodfin R.M. The effects of elevated CO2 and light environment on growth and reproductive performance of four annual species. New Phytol 1999; 144: 455–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebl R.A., Simmons F.W., Wax L.M., Stoller E.W. Effect of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech 1992; 6: 838–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, irrigation, and crop genotype on canopy relations and yields of an intercrop/weed mixture. Field Crops Res 1989; 22: 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Corson S., Rowe R.J., Halteman W.A. Dry bean responses to nitrogen fertilizer in two tillage and residue management systems. Agron J 1995; 87: 538–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Dyck E. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol Appl 1993; 3: 92–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Davis A.S. Integration of soil, crop, and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Res 2000; 40: 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Gallandt E.R. “Many little hammers: ecological management of crop-weed interactions.” In Ecology in Agriculture. L.E. Jackson, ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1997; pp. 287–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Mohler C.L. “Weeds and the soil environment.” In Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds, M. Liebman, C.L. Mohler, C.P. Stayer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001; pp. 210–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Robichaux R.H. Competition by barley and pea against mustard: effects on resource acquisition, photosynthesis and yield. Agric Ecosyst Env 1990; 31: 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Stayer C.P. “Crop diversification for weed management.” In Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds, M. Liebman, C.L. Mohler, C.P. Stayer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001; pp. 322–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligneau L.A.M., Watt T.A. The effects of domestic compost upon the germination and emergence of barley and six arable weeds. Ann Appl Biol 1995; 126: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff F. Understanding the Magdoff pre-sidedress nitrate test for corn. J Prod Agric 1991; 4:297–305. Malik V.S., Swanton C.J., Michaels T.E. Interaction of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars, row spacing, and seeding density with annual weeds. Weed Sci 1993; 41: 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson P. The “50% pesticide cuts” in Europe: a glimpse of our future? Amer Entom 1995; 41(4):210220.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLenaghen R.D., Cameron K.C., Lampkin N.H., Daly M.L., Deo B. Nitrate leaching from ploughed pasture and the effectiveness of winter catch crops in reducing leaching losses. New Zealand J Agric Res 1996; 39: 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melander B., Heisel T., Jorgensen M.H. Band-steaming for intra-row weed control. Proceedings of the 5th Workshop of the European Weed Research Society Working Group on Physical and Cultural Weed Control, 11–13 March 2002, Pisa, Italy. D.C. Cloutier, ed. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada: Institut de Malherbologie, 2002; pp. 216–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melander B., Rasmussen K. Reducing intrarow weed numbers in row crops by means of a biennial cultivation system. Weed Res 2000; 40: 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menalled F.D., Liebman M., Renner K.A. “The ecology of weed seed predation in herbaceous cropping systems.” In Handbook of Sustainable Weed Management,D.R. Batish, ed. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens S.K. Weed Communities on Six Ecological Farms in Flevoland. M.Sc. thesis, Departments of Theoretical Production Ecology and Ecological Agriculture, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens S.K., van den Bosch F., Heesterbeek J.A.P. Weed populations and crop rotations: exploring dynamics of a structured periodic system. Ecol Appl 2002; 12: 1125–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens S.K., Jansen J. Weed seed production, crop planting pattern, and mechanical weeding in wheat. Weed Sci 2002; 50: 748–756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miura R., Kobayashi H., Kusanagi T. Effects of emergence time on survival and plant size in natural populations of Stellaria media and S. neglecta. Weed Res-Japan 1995; 40: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler C.L. Effects of tillage and mulch on weed biomass and sweet corn yield. Weed Tech 1991; 5: 545552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler C.L. A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecol Appl 1993; 3:53–73. Mohler C.L. Ecological bases for the cultural control of weeds. J Prod Agric 1996; 9: 468–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohler C.L. “Mechanical management of weeds.” In Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds,M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, C.L. Mohler, C.P. Stayer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001a; pp. 139–209. Mohler C.L. “Weed life histories: identifying vulnerabilities.” In Ecological Management of Agricultural

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeds, M. Liebman, C.L. Mohler, C.P. Stayer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001b; pp. 40–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler C.L. “Enhancing the competitive ability of crops.” In Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds, M. Liebman, C.L. Mohler, C.P. Stayer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001c; pp. 269–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks C.D., Monks D.W., Basden T., Selders A., Poland S., Rayburn E. Soil temperature, soil moisture, weed control, and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) response to mulching. Weed Tech 1997; 11: 56 1566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody K., Drost D.C. The role of cropping systems on weeds in rice. Proceedings of the Conference on Weed Control in Rice, 31 August-4 September 1981, Los Bathos, The Philippines. Los Banos, The Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1983; pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mt. Pleasant J., Schlather K.J. Incidence of weed seed in cow (Bos sp.) manure and its importance as a weed source for cropland. Weed Tech 1994; 8:304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schärer H., Frantzen J. An emerging system management approach for biological weed control in crops: Senecio vulgaris as a research model. Weed Res 1996; 36: 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock E.C., Banks P.A., Toler J.E. Shade development effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference with soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 1986; 34: 711–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy S.D., Yakubu Y., Weise S.F., Swanton C.J. Effect of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between com (Zea mays) and late emerging weeds. Weed Sci 1996; 44: 865–870.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S., Rorie S. Facts and stats: the year in review. 2001. Available on-line at: http://www.organicandnaturalnews.com/articles/Oc I feat l.html.

  • Natarajan M., Wiley R.W. Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping and the effects of plant population density. 1. Growth and yield. J Agric Sci, Cambridge 1980a; 95: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan M., Willey R.W. Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping and the effects of plant population density. 2. Resource use. J Agric Sci, Cambridge 1980b; 95: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris R.F. Ecological implications of using thresholds for weed management. J Crop Prod 1999; 2:31–58. Norris R.F., Ayres D. Cutting interval and irrigation timing in alfalfa: yellow foxtail invasion and economic analysis. Agron J 1991; 83: 552–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno T., Doolan K., Zibilske L.M., Liebman M., Gallandt E.R., Berube C. Phytotoxic effects of red clover amended soils on wild mustard seedling growth. Agric Ecosyst Env 2000; 78: 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsdotter M. Getting closer to breeding for competitive ability and the role of allelopathy-an example from rice (Oryza saliva). Weed Tech 2001a; 15: 798–806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsdotter M. Rice-a step toward use of allelopathy. Agron J 2001b; 93: 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ominski P.D., Entz M.H., Kenkel N. Weed suppression by Medicago sativa in subsequent cereal crops: a comparative survey. Weed Sci 1999; 47: 282–290.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozores-Hampton M., Stoffella P.J., Bewick T.A., Cantliffe D.J., Obreza T.A. Effect of age of composted MSW and biosolids on weed seed germination. Compost Sci Utill 999; 7: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul N.D., Ayres P.G., Hallett S.G. Mycoherbicides and other biocontrol agents for Senecio spp. Pesticide Sci 1993; 37: 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock L., Norton G.A. A critical analysis of organic vegetable crop protection in the U.K. Agric Ecosyst Env 1990; 31: 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino J., Sans F.X., Masalles R.M. Population dynamics of Rumex obtusifolius under contrasting luceme cropping systems. Weed Res 1998; 38: 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitty A., Staniforth D.W., Tiffany L.H. Fungi associated with caryopses of Setaria species from field-harvested seeds and from soil under two tillage systems. Weed Sci 1987; 35: 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J., Ascard J. Weed control in organic farming systems. In Ecology and Integrated Farming Systems, M. Glen, M.P. Greaves, H.M. Anderson, eds. Chichester, UK: Wiley Publishers, 1995; pp. 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen K. Influence of liquid manure application method on weed control in spring cereals. Weed Res 2002; 42: 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen K., Rasmussen J., Petersen J. Effects of fertilizer placement on weeds in weed harrowed spring barley. Acta Agric Scandinavica, Section B, Soil Plant Sci 1996; 46: 192–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts H.A., Chancellor R.J., Hill T.A. “The biology of weeds.” In Weed Control Handbook–Principles (Volume 1, 7` 6 edition). H.A. Roberts, ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1982; pp. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts H.A., Feast P.M. Emergence and longevity of seeds of annual weeds in cultivated and undisturbed soil. J Appl Ecol 1972; 10: 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts H.A., Lockett P.M. Germination of buried and dry-stored seeds of Stellaria media. Weed Res 1975; 15: 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S.M., King J.R., Izaurralde R.C., O’Donovan J.T. Weed suppression by seven clover species. Agron J 2001; 93: 820–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai K., Sasao A., Shubusawa S., Ohara M. Weed ecological system modeling for optimizing tillage process. Proceedings of the ASAE-CSAE-SCGR Annual International Meeting, Toronto, ON, 18–21 July 1999. ASAE Paper No. 995032, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury E.J. Weeds and Aliens. London, UK: Collins, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnieders B.J. A Quantitative Analysis ofInterspecifzc Competition in Crops with a Row Structure. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonbeck M.W. Weed suppression and labor costs associated with organic, plastic, and paper mulches in small-scale vegetable production. J Sust Agric 1998; 13 (2): 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber M.M. Influence of tillage, crop rotation, and weed management on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) population dynamics and corn yield. Weed Sci 1992; 40: 645–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, D.E. Farmers’ weed control technology for water-seeded rice in North America. Proceedings of the Conference on Weed Control in Rice, 31 August-4 September 1981, Los Baflos, The Philippines. Los Banos, The Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1983; pp. 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetty S.V.R., Rao A.N. Weed management studies in sorghum/pigeonpea and pearl millet/groundnut intercrop systems — some observations. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping, 10–13 January 1979, Hyderabad, India. R.W. Willey, ed. Patencheru, India: ICRISAT, 1981; pp. 238248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirilipour A., McConnell D.B. Effects of compost heat and phytotoxins on germination of certain Florida weed seeds. Soil Crop Sci Soc Florida Proceedings 1991; 50: 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D., Stiling P. How risky is biological control? Ecology 1996; 77:1965–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M.S., Frye W.W., Varco J.J. Legume winter cover crops. Adv Soil Sci 1987; 7: 95–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Association. Organic facts and figures, May 2001: European organic food production. 2001. Available on-line at http://www.soilassociation.orgSA/SAWebDoc.nsf.

  • Stapleton J.J., DeVay J.E. “Soil solarization: a natural mechanism of integrated pest management.” In Novel Approaches to Integrated Pest Management, R. Reuvani, ed. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, 1995; pp. 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbauer G.P., Grigsby B., Correa L., Frank P. A study of methods for obtaining laboratory germination of certain weed seeds. Assoc Official Seed Anal Proc 1955; 45: 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R.H., Lynch K.W., White E.M. The effect of growing clover cultivars in association with barley cultivars upon grain yield of the barley crop in the year of sowing and the subsequent year. J Agric Sci, Cambridge 1980; 95: 715–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storkey J., Cussans J.W. Relationships between temperature and the early growth of Triticum aestivum and three weed species. Weed Sci 2000; 48: 467–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stute J.K., Posner J.L. Legume cover crops as a nitrogen source for corn in an oat-corn rotation. J Prod Agric 1995; 8: 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanton C.J., Griffiths J.T., Cromar H.E., Booth B.D. Pre-and post-dispersal weed seed predation and its implications to agriculture. Proceedings of the 1999 Brighton Crop Protection Conference–Weeds. Farnham, Surrey, UK: British Crop Protection Council, 1999; pp. 829–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale J.R. Influence of narrow row/high population corn (Zea mays) on weed control and light transmittance. Weed Technol 1995; 9: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale J.R. “Cover Crops, Smother Plants, and Weed Management.” In Integrated Weed and Soil Management, J.L. Hatfield, D.D. Buhler, B.A. Stewart, eds. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press, 1998; pp. 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale J.R., Daughtry C.S.T. Weed suppression by live and dessicated hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Weed Sci 1993; 41: 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale J.R., Frank J.R. Effect of row spacing on weed competition with snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci 1983; 31: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale J.R., Mohler C.L. The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Sci 2000; 48: 385–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989. Vereijken P. Designing prototypes. Progress Report 1 of the Research Network on Integrated andEcological Arable Farming Systems for EU and Associated Countries. AB-DLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken P. A methodical way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms. European J Agron 1999; 7: 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vezina L. Influence de la date de semis sur la compétition de peuplements de Setaria pumila et d’Echinochloa crus-galli avec l’orge et le blé de printemps. Weed Res 1992; 32: 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz E. Third Biennial National Organic Farmers’ Survey. Santa Cruz, CA: Organic Farming Research Foundation, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver S.E. Critical period of weed competition in three vegetable crops in relation to management practices. Weed Res1984; 24: 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver S.E., Kropff M.J., Groeneveld R.M.W. Use of ecophysiological models for crop-weed interference: the critical period of weed interference. Weed Sci 1992; 40: 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston L.A. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron J 1996; 88: 860866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey R.W. Intercropping: its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstr 1979; 32: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey R.W. Resource use in intercropping systems. Agric Water Manage 1990; 17: 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J., Wick C., Scadaci S., Klonsky K., Chaney D., Livingstone P., Tourte L. Sample costs to produce organic rice, water-seeded, in the Sacramento Valley. Davis, CA: University of California Cooperative Extension, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B.J., Wright K.J., Butler R.C. The effect of different frequencies of harrowing in the autumn or spring on winter wheat, and on control of Stellaria media, Galium aparine and Brassica napus. Weed Res 1993; 33: 501–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R.G. Dissemination of weed seeds by surface irrigation water in western Nebraska. Weed Sci 1980; 28: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J., Drummond F.A., Liebman M. Effect of crop habitat and potato management practices on the population abundance of adult Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Maine. J Agric Entom 1998; 15: 63–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liebman, M., Bastiaans, L., Baumann, D.T. (2004). Weed Management in Low-External-Input and Organic Farming Systems. In: Inderjit (eds) Weed Biology and Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0552-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0552-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6493-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0552-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics