Skip to main content

Anomalies and the Revision of Theory-Elements: Notes on the Advance of Mercury’s Perihelion

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 260))

Abstract

The history of anomalies shows that empirical theories are by no means defenseless against conflicts with observational data. By contrast, they have refined immunization mechanisms at their disposal, which can be utilized to protect their fundamental principles. This lecture is devoted to some considerations concerning these immunization mechanisms. I will argue that a special variant of the semantic view of empirical theories, namely the structuralist approach, is especially well suited for the treatment of conflicts of this type. As an illustrative example, I will use one of the most famous anomalies discovered in the nineteenth century: the anomaly of Mercury’s perihelion. First, let me present a brief sketch of Mercury’s anomaly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Babinet, M. (1846), “Mémoire sur les nuages ignés du soleil considérés comme des masses planétaires”, Acad. Scie. Paris 22, 281–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E.W. (1903), “On the Verification of the Newtonian Law”, Mon. Not. r. astr. Soc. 64, 530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clairaut, A.C. (1745), “Du système du monde dans les principes de la gravitation universelle”, Hist. Mem. Acad. r. Sci. 32, 329–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1915), “Erklärung der Perihelbewegung des Merkur aus der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie”, Sitzungsber. k. preuss. Akad. Wiss. Pt. 2, 831–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gähde, U. (1989), “Bridge Structures and the Borderline Between the Internal and External History of Science”, in: K. Gavroglu et. al. (eds.), Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 111, Dordrecht - Boston - London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gähde, U. (1996), “Holism and the Empirical Claim of Theory Nets”, in: W. Balzer, C.U. Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results, Berlin — New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. (1981), Theory and Evidence, second printing, with corrections, Princeton, N.J.: U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (1894), “A Suggestion in the Theory of Mercury”, Astr. J. 14, 49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. Sc Musgrave, A. (eds.) (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Verrier, U.J.J. (1859), “Theorie du mouvement de Mercure”, Ann Observ. imp. Paris (Mém.) 5, 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, S. (1882), “Discussion and Results of Observations on Transits of Mercury From 1677 to 1881”, Astr. Pap. am. Ephem. naut. Alm. 1, 367–487, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, S. (1895), “The Elements of the Four Inner Planets and the Fundamental Constants of Astronomy”, Astr. Pap. am. Ephem. naut. Alm. 6, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1961), From a Logical Point of View, 2nd. edition, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1974), Methods of Logic,3rd. edition, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, W. (1908), “Recherches critiques sur l’électrodynamique générale”, Ann. chim. Phy. Ser. 8 13, 145–275. Reprinted in: Gesammelte Werke, pp. 317–422, Paris: Gauthier-Villars (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseveare, N.T. (1982), Mercury’s Perihelion. From Le Verrier to Einstein, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeliger, H. von (1906), “Das Zodiakallicht und die empirischen Glieder in der Bewegung der inneren Planeten”, Sitzungsber. Math. Naturwiss. Kl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. München 36, 595–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zöllner, F. (1872), “Ueber die Natur der Cometen”, Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zöllner, F. (1882), “Erklärung der universellen Gravitation aus den statistischen Wirkungen der Elektricität und die allgemeine Bedeutung des Weber’schen Gesetzes”, Leipzig: Fock.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gähde, U. (1997). Anomalies and the Revision of Theory-Elements: Notes on the Advance of Mercury’s Perihelion. In: Chiara, M.L.D., Doets, K., Mundici, D., Van Benthem, J. (eds) Structures and Norms in Science. Synthese Library, vol 260. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4787-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0538-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics