Advertisement

Historical Ontology

  • Ian Hacking
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 316)

Abstract

‘Historical ontology’ is not, at first sight, a happy phrase. It is too self-important by half. I have always disliked the word ‘ontology’. It was around, in Latin, in the seventeenth century, naming a branch of metaphysics, alongside cosmology and psychology. Christian Wolff (1729) helped confirm it in use. He thought of ontology as the study of being in general, as opposed to philosophical reflection on individual but ultimate entities such as the soul, the world, and God. If, like myself, you are hard pressed to explain what a study of being in general would be, you can hardly welcome talk of ontology. In the twentieth century the word attracted significant philosophers such as Quine and Heidegger, but their pronouncements, in its name, were bizarre Think of Quine’s ‘To be is to be the value of a variable’. And yet, and yet: suppose we want to talk in a quite general way about all manner of objects, and what makes it possible for them to come into being. It is convenient to group them together by talking about ‘What there is’, or ontology. And if we are concerned with the coming into being of possibilities, what is that if not historical?

Keywords

Child Development Moral Agent Antisocial Personality Disorder Scientific Objectivity Pristine State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crombie, A.C.: (1994), Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition, 3 vols., Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  2. Daston, L., Parks, K.: (1998), Wonders and the Order of Nature, Zone Books, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Daston, L., Galison, P.: (1992), ‘The Image of Objectivity’, Representations 40, pp. 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daston, L.: (1991), ‘Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity’, Annals of Scholarship 8, pp. 337–364.Google Scholar
  5. Daston, L.: (1992), ‘Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective’, Social Studies of Science 22, pp. 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daston, L.: (1995), ‘The Moral Economy of Science’, Osiris, pp. 102–124.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, A.: (1996), ‘Styles of Reasoning, Conceptual History, and the Emergence of Psychiatry’, in Galison and Stump ( 1996 ), pp. 75–100.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M.: (1997), ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in Rabinow (ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (Vol. I of Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984), The New Press, New York, pp. 303–320.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M.: (1970), The Archaeology of Knowledge, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M.: (1972), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  11. Galison, P., Stump, D. (eds.): (1996), The Disunity ofScience: Boundaries, Contexts and Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  12. Hacking, I.: (1975), The Emergence of Probability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Hacking, I.: (1986a), ‘Leibniz and Descartes: Proof and Eternal Truths’, in A. Kenny (ed.), Rationalism, Empiricism and Idealism, British Academy lectures on the History of Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 47–60; original 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Hacking, I.: (1986b), ‘Making Up People’, in T. Heller et al. (eds.), Reconstructing Individualism, Stanford University Press, pp. 222–236.Google Scholar
  15. Hacking, I.: (1990), The Taming of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Hacking, I.: (1991), ‘The Making and Molding of Child Abuse’, Critical Inquiry 17, pp. 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hacking, I.: (1996), ‘The Disunities of the Sciences’, in Galison and Stump ( 1996 ), pp. 37–74.Google Scholar
  18. Hacking, I.: (1998), Mad Travelers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Illnesses, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
  19. Hacking, I.: (1999), ‘Historical Meta-epistemology’, in W. Carl, L. Daston (eds.), Wahrheit und Geschichte, Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, Göttingen, pp. 54–77.Google Scholar
  20. Hacking, 1.: (2001), Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic, Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James, W.: (1911), Some Main Problems of Philosophy, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  22. Jung, C.G.: (1970), ‘The Meaning of Psychology for Modem Man’, in C.G. Jung, Civilization in Transition, trans. by R.F.C. Hull, 2nd edn., Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 134–156.Google Scholar
  23. Leys, R.: (1999), A Genealogy of Trauma, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, G.E.: (1953), Some Main Problems of Philosophy, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  25. Poovey, M.: (1998), A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Rée, J.: (1999), I See a Voice: Language, Deafness and the Senses —A Philosophical History, HarperCollins, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Rubin, E.: (1998), ‘Our Children are Killing Us’, The New Yorker, 23rd March.Google Scholar
  28. Russell, B.: (1912), The Problems of Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Shapin, S., Schaffer, S.: (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  30. Wolff, C.: (1729), Philosophia Prima Sive Ontologia, Frankfurt and Leipzig.Google Scholar
  31. Wong, J.: (1995), The Very Idea of Child Development, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  32. Young, A.: (1995), The Harmony of Illusions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.Google Scholar
  33. Young, A.: (1996), ‘Bodily Memories and Traumatic Memories’, in P. Antze, M. Lambek (eds.), Tense Past: Cultural Essays in Trauma and Memory, Routledge, New York and London, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
  34. 1.
    The references are to Hacking (1975), (1990), (1991), (1998).Google Scholar
  35. 2.
    October-3 November 1993. This was a conference for graduate students primarily from Paris, Chicago and Toronto, and a few of their teachers. Among the teachers, Daston submitted for student discussion what became Daston (1995). Arnold Davidson submitted what became Davidson (1996). Bruno Latour submitted “A Matter of Life and Death.” I submitted what became Hacking (1999).Google Scholar
  36. 3.
    G.E. Moore, Lectures at Morley College, London “during the Winter of 1910,” published as Moore (1953). James (1911), Russell (1912).Google Scholar
  37. 4.
    I explain these matters in an elementary way at the end of my introductory textbook, Hacking (2001).Google Scholar
  38. 5.
    The sentence “Hume has become possible” comes from Foucault (1970, p. 60).Google Scholar
  39. 6.
    I stated this attitude at the end of a Dawes Hicks lecture to the British Academy, in 1973. See a reprint, Hacking ( 1986a, p. 60 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Hacking
    • 1
  1. 1.Collège de FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations