Advertisement

Managed Care and the Deprofessionalization of Medicine

  • H. Tristram EngelhardtJr.
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 76)

Abstract

Managed care is only one among a cluster of powerful influences that transformed the American medical profession over the last three-quarters of the 20th century. This study explores managed care’s impact on medicine’s sense of itself as a profession. The study begins by acknowledging the role of a number of other important developments, including anti-trust law, the law of informed consent, and the general socioeconomic transformation of the physician-patient relationship. Managed care is recognized as the culmination of these changes that have reshaped the profession of medicine. In the case of managed care, its intrusion is understood as in great measure the result of a failure honestly to face the tension between finite resources and unlimited concerns to expend funds to avoid suffering and death.

Keywords

American Medical Association Medical Ethic Professional Identity Cost Containment Federal Trade Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Medical Association v. Federal Trade Commission,638 F.2d 443 (2d Cir. 1980).Google Scholar
  2. American Medical Association (1941). United States of America vs. American Medical Association et al.: Report of a Tria., Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  3. Cabot, R. (1916). Differential Diagnosis, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co. Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 ( D.C. Cir. 1972 ).Google Scholar
  4. Davidoff, F. (1998a). ‘Medicine and commerce. 1: Is managed care a ‘monstrous hybrid’?’ Annals of Internal Medicine, 128 (6), 496–499.Google Scholar
  5. Davidoff, F. (1998b). ‘Medicine and commerce. 2: The gift.’ Annals of Internal Medicine, 128 (7), 572575.Google Scholar
  6. Edelstein, L. (1956). ‘The professional ethics of the Greek physician.’ Bulletin of the History of Medicine 30, 391–419.Google Scholar
  7. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. (2002). ‘Secular priests, moral consensus, and ethical experts: The creation of bioethicists as secular moral experts.’ Social Philosophy and Policy, 19 (Summer), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. (2000). The Foundations of Christian Bioethics. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  9. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr., Rie, M. (1992). ‘Selling virtue: Ethics as profit maximizing strategy in health care delivery.’ Journal of Health and Social Policy, 4, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faden, R. Beauchamp, T. (1986). A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Flexner, A. (1910). Medical Education in the United States and Canada, A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin No. 4. New York: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Goldzweig, C. et al. (1997). ‘Variations in cataract extraction rates in medicine prepaid and fee-forservice settings.’ Journal of the American Medical Association, 277 (22), 1765–1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross, R. (1993). ‘Intuition and technology as bases of medical decision-making.’ In: C. DelkeskampHayes M. A. G. Cutter (Eds.), Science, Technology, and the Art of Medicine (pp. 183–197 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Gurwitz, J. et al. (1997). ‘Delayed hospital presentation in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction.’ Annals of Internal Medicine, 126 (8), 593–599.Google Scholar
  15. Hippocrates (1959). ‘On Decorum’ XII, in Hippocrates, W.H.S. Jones (Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. King, L.S. (1991). Transformations in American Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Konold, D.E. (1962). A History of American Medical Ethics 1847–1912. Madison: University of Wiscons in Press.Google Scholar
  17. Maulitz, R. (1988). ‘The physician and authority: A historical appraisal.’ In: Nancy M.P. King, Larry R. Churchill, Alan W. Cross (Eds.), The Physician as Captain of the Ship: A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Mohr v. Williams,95 Minn. 261, 104 N.W. 12 (1905).Google Scholar
  19. Morgan, R. et al. (1997). ‘The Medicare-HMO revolving door–The healthy go in and the sick go out.’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 337 (3), 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Natanson v. Kline,186 Kan. 393, 350 P. 2d 1093 (1960).Google Scholar
  21. Neilson, W.A., Knott, T.A. Carhart, P.W. (Eds.). (1960). Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2°d ed. Springfield, MA: Merriam Co.Google Scholar
  22. Pellegrino, Edmund D. Thomasma, D.C. (1988). For the Patient’s Good. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Retchin, S. et al. (1997). ‘Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care.’ Journal of the American Medical Association, 278 (2), 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schutz, A. Luckmann, T. (1973). The Structures of the Life-World. R.M. Zaner H.T. Engelhardt, Jr. (Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Scott v. Bradford,606 P.2d 554 (Okla. 1980).Google Scholar
  26. Slater v. Baker and Stapleton,95 Eng. Rep. 860, 2 Wils. K.B. 359 (1767).Google Scholar
  27. Spencer v. Siekel,742 P.2d 1126 (Okla. 1987).Google Scholar
  28. Starr, P. (1982). The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Strosberg, M. et al. (eds.). (1992). Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  30. Toulmin, Stephen (1977). “The meaning of professionalism.’ In: H.T. Engelhardt, Jr. D. Callahan (Eds.), Knowledge Value and Belief. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: The Hastings Center.Google Scholar
  31. The United States of America, Appellants, v. The American Medical Association, A Corporation; The Medical Society of the District of Columbia, A Corporation; et al.,317 U.S. 519 (1943).Google Scholar
  32. Wieland, W. (1993). ‘The concept of the art of medicine.’ In: C. Delkeskamp-Hayes M.A.G. Cutter (Eds.), Science, Technology, and the Art of Medicine (pp. 165–181 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Tristram EngelhardtJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Rice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations