Advertisement

Ethical Dilemmas in Managed Care for the Practitioner

  • Eugene V. Boisaubin
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 76)

Abstract

Those who believe in the cycles of history must be struck by the dramatic upheavals at both the beginning and end of this concluding century that have characterized American medicine. Some particular historical analogies are also in order. The beginning of the twentieth century saw the evolution from the Dark Ages of American medicine as the Flexner Report set needed standards for education and training. By the 1950s, the age of technology, like the Renaissance and later Age of Faith, led to an exuberance of discoveries, treatments and hope that seemed unbounded. But now, as a new century dawns, the Reformation is with us in the form of cost awareness and containment and shows no hope of abating now, or in the near future (Boisaubin, 1994, pp. 1–2).

Keywords

England Journal American Medical Association Primary Care Provider Ethical Dilemma Cost Containment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asch, D.A. and Ubel, P.A. (1997). `Rationing by any other name,’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 1668–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodenheimer, T., Lo, B., and Casalino, L. (1999). `Primary care physicians should be coordinators, not gatekeepers,’ Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 2045–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boisaubin, E.V. (1994). `Ethical and legal dilemmas in managed care,’ Medical Humanities Rounds, 11, 1–2.Google Scholar
  4. Boisaubin, E.V. (1996). ‘Confessions of a gatekeeper. The new realities of managed-care practice,’ Medical Humanities Rounds, 13, 1–2.Google Scholar
  5. Branch, W.T. (2000). ‘Is the therapeutic nature of the patient-physician relationship being undermined?’ Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 2257–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudley, R.A. and Luft, H.S. (2001). ‘Managed care in transition,’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 44, 1087–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldman, D.S., Novack, D.H. and Gracely, E. (1998). ‘Effects of managed care on physician-patient relationships, quality of care, and the ethical practice of medicine,’ Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 1626–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grumbach, K., Osmond, D., Vranizan, K., Jaffe, D. and Bindman, A.B. (1998). ‘Primary care physicians’ experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems,’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1516–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, M.A. and Berenson, R.A. (1998). ‘Ethical practice in managed care: A dose of realism,’ Annals of Internal Medicine, 128, 395–402.Google Scholar
  10. Iglehart, J.K. (1994). ‘Physicians and the growth of managed care,’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 1167–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kassirer, J.P. (1998). ‘Managing care — should we adopt a new ethic?’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 397–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, T.H. and Boucher, C.A. (2001). ‘Noninvasive tests in patients with stable coronary artery disease,’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 1840–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loewy, E.H. and Loewy, R.S. (1998). ‘Ethics and managed care. Reconstructing a system and refashioning a society,’ Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 2419–2422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ludmerer, K.M. (1999). Time to Heal: American Medical Education from the Turn of the Century to the Era of Managed Care. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Mechanic, D. and Schlesinger, M. (1996). `The impact of managed care on patients’ trust in medical care and their physicians,’ Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 1693–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mechanic, D. (1997). `Managed care as a target of distrust,’ Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1810–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, M.N. and Mcgowen, K.R. (2000). `The painful truth: physicians are not invincible,’ Southern Medical Journal, 93, 966–972.Google Scholar
  18. Mirvis, D.M. and Chang, C.F. (1997). `Managed care, managing uncertainty,’ Archives of Internal Medicine, 157, 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson, J.C. (2001). `The end of managed care,’ Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2622–2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodwin, M.A. (1995). `Conflicts in managed care,’ The New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 604–607. Shortell, S.M., Waters, T.M., Clarke, K.W.B. & Budetti, P.P. (1998). `Physicians as double agents: Maintaining trust in an era of multiple accountabilities,’ Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1102–1108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene V. Boisaubin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA

Personalised recommendations