Abstract
By the word “characterisation” I mean, as previously explained (section A 2 (3)–(4) above), propositions that are neither definitions nor analytically un/true; that is to say, propositions which do not contribute to determining the meanings of linguistic entities (do not contribute to determining concepts), but which presuppose this topic (in contrast to definitions, which thematise it), and say something beyond what lies in the concept criteria (in contrast to analytically un/true propositions). What is said beyond the concept criteria may be about non/existence of phenomena that satisfy the concept criteria, or about (presupposedly existing) phenomena’s properties beyond the concept criteria. And independently of this, characterisations can have descriptive, normative, or fused descriptive and normative modality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eng, S. (2003). Characterisations. In: Analysis of Dis/Agreement — with particular reference to Law and Legal Theory. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 66. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0381-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0381-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6370-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0381-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive