Advertisement

Overview Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance

Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology, and Cognitive Science (NBIC)
  • M. C. Roco
  • W. S. Bainbridge
Chapter

Abstract

We stand at the threshold of a new renaissance in science and technology, based on a comprehensive understanding of the structure and behavior of matter from the nanoscale up to the most complex system yet discovered, the human brain. Unification of science based on unity in nature and its holistic investigation will lead to technological convergence and a more efficient societal structure for reaching human goals. In the early decades of the twenty-first century, concentrated effort can bring together nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and new technologies based in cognitive science. With proper attention to ethical issues and societal needs, the result can be a tremendous improvement in human abilities, new industries and products, societal outcomes, and quality of life.

Keywords

Augmented Reality Human Performance Cognitive Science Workshop Participant Supply Chain Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, N.C. 1997. Linking mind and brain in the study of mental illnesses. Science 275: 1586 - 1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Yam, Y. 1997. Dynamics of complex systems. Cambridge, Perseus Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bonadio, J. 2002. Gene therapy: Reinventing the wheel or useful adjunct to existing paradigms? In Chapter C of this report.Google Scholar
  4. Brain work: The neuroscience newsletter. 2002. Neuroethics: Mapping the field. Editor’s note, in Vol. 12 No. 3, May-June 2002, p. 1.Google Scholar
  5. Caplow, T., L. Hicks, and B.J. Wattenberg. 2001. The first measured century: An illustrated guide to trends in America, 1900-2000. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cauller, L. and A. Penz. 2002. Artificial brains and natural intelligence. In Chapter C of this report.Google Scholar
  7. Connolly, P. 2002. Nanobiotechnology and life extension. In Chapter C of this volume.Google Scholar
  8. Horn, R. 2002. Visual language. Stanford U. http://www.stanford.edu/—rhorn/ index.html; http://macrovu.com/Google Scholar
  9. Heller, M. 2002. The nano-bio connection and its implication for human performance. In Chapter C of this report.Google Scholar
  10. Hewlett Packard. 2002. Cool town. http://www.exploratorium.edu/ pr/alliance.html. IBM. 2002. User system ergonomics research. http://www.almaden.ibm.com/ cs/user.html.Google Scholar
  11. Jorgenson, D.W., and C.W. Wessner (eds.). 2002. Measuring and sustaining the new economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kennedy, D. 2002. Are there things we’d rather not know? Brain work: The neuroscience newsletter, Vol. 12 No. 3, May-June 2002, p. 6.Google Scholar
  13. Kurzweil, R. 1999. The age of spiritual machines. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  14. Lavine, M., L. Roberts, and O. Smith. 2002. Bodybuilding: The bionic human. Science 295: 995 - 1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mowery, D.C. (ed.). 1999. U.S. industry in 2000: Studies in competitive performance. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  16. National Institute of Mental Health. 2002. Learning and the brain. http://www.edupr.com/brain4.html;http://www.edupr.com/bsched.html.Google Scholar
  17. National Research Council. 1988. Enhancing human performance. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. National Research Council (Committee on Assessing Crop Yields). 1997. Precision agriculture in the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  19. National Research Council (Committee on Visionary Manufacturing Challenges). 1998. Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. National Research Council (Committee on Biobased Industrial Products). 1999. Biobased industrial products: Priorities for research and commercialization. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council (Committee on Supply Chain Integration). 2000. Surviving supply chain integration. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  22. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC, Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology). 2002. National Nanotechnology Initiative: The initiative and its implementation plan (detailed technical report associated with the supplemental report to the President’s FY 2003 budget). White House: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS). 2002. Unifying knowledge: The convergence of natural and human science. New York: NYAS Annals.Google Scholar
  24. Ostrom, E., T. Dietz, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E.U. Weber. 2002. The drama of the commons. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Roco, M.C. and W.S. Bainbridge (eds). 2001. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publ. Also available at http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications.Google Scholar
  26. Roco, M.C. 2002. Coherence and divergence of megatrends in science and technology. In Chapter A of this volume.Google Scholar
  27. Saxl, O. 2002. Summary of conference on nanobiotechnology, life extension and the treatment of congenital and degenerative disease, institute of nanotechnology, U.K.Google Scholar
  28. Spohrer, J. 2002. NBICs (nano-bio-info-cogno-socio) convergence to improve human performance: opportunities and challenges. In Chapter B of this report.Google Scholar
  29. Stern, Paul C., and Laura L. Carstensen (eds.). 2000. The aging mind: Opportunities in cognitive research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Also available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9783.html.Google Scholar
  30. Steve, S., R. Orpwood, M. Malot, X, and E. Zrenner. 2002. Mimicking the brain. Physics World 15 (2): 27 - 31.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations Development Program. 2001. Making new technologies work for human development. Part of the 2001 Human Development Report, UK: Oxford University Press. Also available at http://www.undp.org/hdr2001/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Roco
  • W. S. Bainbridge

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations