Abstract
We investigate ordinary kriging and three cokriging procedures for making continuous maps of five forest attributes. Both ordinary kriging and cokriging use a primary variable, but cokriging, like multivariate statistics, includes secondary variables. The secondary or ancillary variables are reflectance values and calculated vegetation indices from an August 1996 Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite image. Two methods for comparing the results include examining the residuals and breaking both the estimated and sampled data into classes and then examining the resulting confusion matrix. The comparison statistics are root mean square error, overall accuracy, and kappa statistic. For the cross-validation, an additional statistic was median absolute error. A cross-validation indicated that cokriging had a higher overall accuracy and kappa statistic and a lower median absolute error, while kriging yielded a slightly lower root mean square error. Both procedures captured the same trends in Connecticut. The developed areas around New York City and the I-91 corridor running from New Haven through Hartford into Massachusetts are less forested than the less developed and higher elevation areas in the northwestern portion of the state. Kriging smoothes the maps, missing the fine-scale heterogeneity of the landscape that cokriging detects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
Almeida, A.S. and A.G. Journel. 1994. Joint simulation of multiple variables with a Markov-type coregionalization model. Mathematical Geology 26(5):565–588.
Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 428p.
Goovaerts, P. 1998. Ordinary cokriging revisited. Mathematical Geology 30(l):21–42.
Deutsch, C.V. and A.G. Journel. 1998. GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide, Second Edition. Oxford University Press, New York. 369p.
Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics For Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York. 483p.
Goulard, M. 1989. Inference in a coregionalization model. In: Geostatistics. M. Armstrong (ed.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, p. 397–408.
Hoppus, M., R. Riemann, and A. Lister. (In press). Remote sensing strategies for forest inventory analysis utilizing the FIA plot database. In: Proceedings of RS 2000: Eighth Biennial Remote Sensing Applications Conference, Albuquerque, NM. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
Journel, A.G. 1999. Markov models for cross-covariances. Mathematical Geology 31(8):955–964.
King, S.L., A.J. Lister, and M. Hoppus. (In press). A comparison of kriging and cokriging for mapping forest volume in Connecticut. In: Proceedings of SOFOR GIS 2000: The 3rd Southern Forestry GIS Conference, Athens, GA.
Ma, X. and A.G. Journel. 1999. An expanded GSLIB cokriging program allowing for two Markov models. Computers & Geosciences 25:627–639.
Morisette, J. 1997. Examples using SAS to fit the model of linear model of coregionalization. Computers & Geosciences 23(3):317–323.
Shmaryan, L.E. and A.G. Journel. 1999. Two Markov models and their application. Mathematical Geology 31(8):965–989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
King, S.L., Lister, A.J., Hoppus, M.L. (2003). Estimating and Mapping Five Forest Attributes with Satellite Ancillary Data. In: Arthaud, G.J., Barrett, T.M. (eds) Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6280-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0307-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive