Abstract
Sjoerd D. Zwart’s doctoral dissertation Approach to the Truth (1998) divides theories of truthlikeness into two rival approaches. The content definitions operate with the notions of truth value and logical strength, and the likeness definitions employ the notion of similarity between possible worlds or their representations (structures, constituents). This division is not as such novel, but Zwart links it in an interesting way to the question: what is the least truthlike theory? He also notes that my own theory, given in Truthlikeness (1987), can give either a content or likeness ordering. This observation is correct, and it gives me a welcome opportunity to clarify, motivate, and sharpen my views.
This paper is based on a lecture given at the Eleventh International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science in Cracow, in August 1999
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aronson, J. L., R. Harré, and E. C. Way: 1994, Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible, Duckworth, London.
Brink, C. and J. Heidema: 1987, ‘A Verisimilar Ordering of Theories Phrased in a Propositional Language’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 533–549.
Hilpinen, R.: 1976, ‘Approximate Truth and Truthlikeness’, in: M. Przełçcki, K. Szaniawski, and R. Wójcicki (eds.), Formal Methods in the Methodology of the Empirical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 19–42.
Kieseppä, I.: 1996, Truthlikeness for Multidimensional, Quantitative Cognitive Problems, Klu-wer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Kuipers, T. A. F.: 2000, From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Miller, D.: 1979, ‘On Distance from the Truth as a True Distance’, in: J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto, and E. Saarinen (eds.), Essays in Mathematical and Formal Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1987, Truthlikeness, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1998, ‘Verisimilitude: The Third Period’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 1–29.
Oddie, G.: 1986, Likeness to Truth, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Popper, K. R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Hutchinson, London.
Tichý, P.: 1974, ‘On Popper’s Definition of Verisimilitude’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 155–160.
Weston, T: 1987, ‘Approximate Truth’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 16, 203–227.
Woleński, J.: 1990, ‘On Comparison of Theories by Their Contents’, Studia Logica 48, 617–622.
Zwart, S. D.: 1998, Approach to the Truth: Verisimilitude and Truthlikeness, ILLC-Dissertation Series 1998–02, Amsterdam.
Zwart, S. D.: 2001, Refined Verisimilitude, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niiniluoto, I. (2003). Content and Likeness Definitions of Truthlikeness. In: Hintikka, J., Czarnecki, T., Kijania-Placek, K., Placek, T., Rojszczak, A. (eds) Philosophy and Logic in Search of the Polish Tradition. Synthese Library, vol 323. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0249-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0249-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6471-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0249-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive