Economics of Forest Carbon Sequestration

Part of the Forestry Sciences book series (FOSC, volume 72)


Concern over rising greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphere and the corresponding potential for harmful global climate change has spawned international effort to mitigate the build-up of GHGs. In addition to targeting reductions of GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion, global mitigation efforts include the sequestration of atmospheric CO2, the most critical GHG, into terrestrial carbon (C) stocks, often referred to as the creation of a C “sink.”


Bare Land Supply Function Commodity Market Land Rent Conservation Reserve Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adams, D.M., and R.W. Haynes. 1980. The Timber Assessment Market Model: Structure, projections, and policy simulations. For. Sci. Monog. No. 22, Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD. 64 p.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D.M., R.D. Alig, and B.A. McCarl. 1996a. An analysis of the impacts of public timber harvest policies on private forest management in the U.S. For. Sci. 42:343–358.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, D.M., R.D. Alig, B.A. McCarl, J.M. Callaway, and S.M. Winnett. 1996b. The forest and agricultural sector optimization model: Model structure and applications. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-495. Pacific Northwest For. and Range Exper. Station, USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, D.M., R.J. Alig, B.A. McCarl, J.M. Callaway, and S.M. Winnett. 1999. Minimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests. Land Econ. 75(3):360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams, R.M., D.M. Adams, J.M. Callaway, C-C. Chang, and B. McCarl. 1993. Sequestering carbon on agricultural land: Social cost and impacts on timber markets. Contemp. Policy Iss. 11(1):76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alig, R.J., D.M. Adams, B.A. McCarl, J.M. Callaway, and S.M. Winnett. 1997. Assessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. forest and agricultural sectors. Env. and Res. Econ. 9:259–274.Google Scholar
  7. Birdsey, R.A., and L.S. Heath. 1995. Carbon changes in U.S. forests. in Productivity of America’s Forests and Climate Change, L.A. Joyce (ed.), pp. 56–70. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-271. USDA Forest Service, Ft. Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  8. Birdsey, R.A. 1996. Carbon storage for major forest types and regions in the conterminous United States. P. 23–29 and Appendix 2 in Forests and Global Change, R.N. Sampson and D. Hair (eds.), Vol. 2. Forest Management Opportunities. American Forests, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, C.C., B.A. McCarl, J. Mjelde, and J. Richardson. 1992. Sectoral implications of farm program modifications. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 74:38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chomitz, K.M. 2002. Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: How do forestry and energy projects compare? Climate Policy 2(1):35–49.Google Scholar
  11. Clinton, W.J., and A. Gore. 1993. The Climate Change Action Plan. Washington, DC: White House Office of Environmental Policy.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, L.S., and K.N. Johnson. 1987. Forest Management. Third Edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY. 790 p.Google Scholar
  13. Dixon, R.K., K.J. Andrasko, F.G. Sussman, M.A. Lavinson, M.C. Trexler, and T.S. Vinson. 1993. Forest sector carbon offset projects: Near-term opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 70:561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardie, I.W., and P.J. Parks. 1997. Land use with heterogeneous land quality: an application of an area base model. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 79:299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartman, R. 1976. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Econ. Inquiry 14(Mar):52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoen, H.F., and B. Solberg. 1997. Carbon dioxide taxing, timber rotations, and market implications. P. S 151–5162 in Economics of Carbon Sequestration in Forestry, R.A. Sedjo, R.M. Sampson, and J. Wisniewski (eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  17. Hoen, H.F. 1994. The Faustmann rotation in the presence of a positive CO2-price. Scand. For. Econ. 35:278–88.Google Scholar
  18. Lashof, D., and B. Hare. 1999. The role of biotic carbon stocks in stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at safe levels. Environ. Sci. and Pol. 2(2):101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarl, B.A., and B.C. Murray. 2001. Harvesting the greenhouse: Comparing biological sequestration with emissions offsets. Unpublished Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  20. Moulton, R.J., and K.R. Richards. 1990. Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. General Technical Report WO-58. USDA Forest Service, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  21. Moura-Costa, P., and C. Wilson. 2000. An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration-description and applications in forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5(1):51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray, B.C. 2000. Carbon values, reforestation, and perverse incentives under the Kyoto Protocol: An empirical analysis. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5(3):271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray, B.C., B.A. McCarl, H.C. Lee. 2002. Estimating leakage from forest carbon sequestration programs. Working Paper 02–06, Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Program, RTI International. Contact for copy.Google Scholar
  24. Newell, R.G., and R.N. Stavins. 2000. Climate change and forest sinks: Factors affecting the costs of carbon sequestration. J. of Environ. Econ. and Manag. 40 (3):211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parks, P.J., and I.W. Hardie. 1995. Least cost forest carbon reserves: cost-effective subsidies to convert marginal agricultural lands to forests. Land Econ. 71(1):122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parks, P.J., and I.W. Hardie. 1996. Forest carbon sinks: Costs and effects of expanding the conservation reserve program. Choices 2nd quarter:37–39.Google Scholar
  27. Pfaff, A.S.P., S. Kerr, R.F. Hughes, S. Liu, G.A. Sanchez-Azofeifa, D. Schimel, J. Tosi, and V. Watson. 2000. The Kyoto Protocol and payments for tropical forest: An interdisciplinary method for estimating carbon-offset supply and increasing the feasibility of a carbon market under the CDM. Ecol. Econ. 35:203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plantinga, A.J., T. Mauldin, and D.J. Miller. 1999. An econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81:812–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sampson, R.N., and R.A. Sedjo. 1997. Economics of carbon sequestration in forestry: An overview. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 27(Special):S1–S8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stavins, R.N., and A.B. Jaffe. 1990. Unintended impacts of public investments on private decisions: The depletion of forested wetlands. Am. Econ. Rev. 80(3):337–352.Google Scholar
  31. Stavins, R. 1999. The costs of carbon sequestration: A revealed preference approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(4):994–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Kooten, C.G., C.S. Binkley, and G. Delcourt. 1995. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77:365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson, R.T., I.R. Noble, B. Bolin, N.H. Ravindranath, D.J. Verardo, and D.J. Dokken (eds.) 2000. Special Report on Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Triangle InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations