Skip to main content

Problematizing the Problem

A Single Case Analysis in a dPBL Meeting

  • Chapter
Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning ((CULS,volume 2))

Abstract

Our interest is in methods used by participants in a Problem-based Learning (PBL) tutorial to recognize and mark a problem in shared understanding. We investigate how this is accomplished in a distributed meeting conducted via a chat interface. Doing so poses an interactional problem for participants and the sorts of solutions that they work out is our object of study here. We observe that a shared understanding becomes problematic through what we term a problematizing move. For an utterance to serve as a problematizing move, however, it must be followed by an uptake move on the part of one or more interlocutors. We argue that the methods members employ for problematizing problems are both important elements of what it means to do PBL and visible aspects of how learning itself is accomplished as a socially-organized practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrows, H.S. (1994). Practice-Based Learning: Problem-Based Learning applied to medical education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991/1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953, Vol. 12. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A., & Jacobs, J. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasisynchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 337–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’ s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (2001, March). Dewey’s contribution to a standard of problem-based learning practice. First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (EuroCSCL), Maastricht, Netherlands. Retrieved April 5, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.mmi.unimaas.nl/eurocscl/Papers/90.pdf

  • Koschmann, T. (Ed.)(2002). Studying collaboration in distributed PBL environments. Distance Education, 23 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • ]Koschmann, T., Glenn, P., & Conlee, M. (2000). When is a problem-based tutorial not tutorial? Analyzing the tutor’s role in the emergence of a learning issue. In D. Evensen & C. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 53–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., Kelson, A.C., Feltovich, P.J., & Barrows, H.S. (1996). Computer-Supported Problem-Based Learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T.D. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., Kuutti, K., & Hickman, L. (1998). The concept of breakdown in Heidegger, Leont’ev, and Dewey and its implications for education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., Zemel, A., Conlee-Stevens, M., Young, N., Robbs, J., & Barnhart, A. (in prep). How do people learn? Member methods and communicative mediation. In. R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (and how they may be overcome). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling ‘how I know’. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 607–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koschmann, T., Zemel, A., Conlee-Stevens, M., Young, N., Robbs, J., Barnhart, A. (2003). Problematizing the Problem. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., Hoppe, U. (eds) Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6321-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0195-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics