Abstract
In the previous chapters I have argued that causation is a matter of counterfactual dependence among states of affairs (particulars’-havingproperties-at-times) as well as of physical connection in and among particulars (mostly objects). On that account, mental causation can be expected to be a matter of counterfactual dependence involving mental states as well as of physical connection involving a minded actor. But physical connections are indeed just that: physical. As far as causal connections are concerned, the only relevant properties will be physical-nomic, not mental ones. I came across this passage about Gödel, the mathematician:
(H)e remarked to his close friend, economist Oskar Morgenstern, that in the future it would be deemed a great oddity that 20th-century scientists had discovered the elementary physical particles but had failed even to consider the possibility of elementary psychic factors.’ (Dawson Jr., 1999, 68)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Where Hume spoke of ‘ideas’ and ‘habits,’ his modern followers who adopt Hempel’s Deductive-Nomological model of explanation speak of ‘logic’ and ‘propositions.’
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Muijnck, W. (2003). The Problem of Causal Relata. In: Dependencies, Connections, and Other Relations. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 93. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0121-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0121-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6326-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0121-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive