The World Well Won: Husserl’s Epistemic Realism One Hundred Years Later
- 204 Downloads
By “epistemic realism” I understand the view that the objects of veridical thought and perception both exist and have the characteristics they are therein discovered to have without regard to whether or not they are in any way actually present to any mind of any type.
KeywordsLogical Investigation Continue Existence Pure Logic Metaphysical Doctrine Epistemic Realism
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.E. HUSSERL, The Idea of Phenomenology,trans. L. Hardy, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, 20‒21. All page references to the Logical Investigations are to the English translation: E. HUSSERL, Logical Investigations,trans. J. N. Findlay, New York: Humanities Press, 1970, abbreviated as LI.Google Scholar
- 2.E. HUSSERL, Ideas I, trans. W. R. Boyce Gibson, London: George Allen liuya Unwin LTD, 1931, 19.Google Scholar
- 3.H. SPIEGELBERG, The Phenomenological Movement,2nd edition, two volumes, The Hague: Martins Nijhoff, 1969,1/123.Google Scholar
- 4.A. N. WHITEHEAD, Science and the Modern World, New York: Mentor Books, 1956, 55–56.Google Scholar
- 5.SARTRE, “Intentionality: a Fundamental Idea of Husserl’s Phenomenology,” trans. J. Fell, The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 1, 1970, 4–5.Google Scholar
- 6.J.-P. SARTRE, “Intentionality,” 4.Google Scholar
- D. HUME,A Treatise of Human Nature,ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, London: Oxford University Press, 1955, Bk. I, Part iv, Sect. 11, p. 188.Google Scholar
- 8.D. HUME, A Treatise,188 and 193.Google Scholar
- 9.D. , Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, London: Oxford University Press, 1984, 185. Similarly Putnam and his rejection of the very idea of a quality “in itself.” H. PUTNAM, The Many Faces of Realism, La Salle, IL.: Open Court, 1987, 8.Google Scholar
- 10.R. RORTY, “The World Well Lost,” in his The Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982, 4.Google Scholar
- 16.For further discussion of what it is to be, and how it applies to the Ideal as well as the real, I refer to my Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge, Athens, OH.: Ohio University Press, 1984, 187–188, etc. For further discussion of many points only mentioned in this paper, see my “The Integrity of the Mental Act: Husserlian Reflections on a Fregean Problem,” in Mind, Meaning and Mathematics, ed. L. Haaparanta, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, 235–262; and my “Knowledge,” in The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, eds. B. Smith and D. W. Smith, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995, 138–167.Google Scholar