Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

John Wallis

  • Chapter
From Discrete to Continuous

Part of the book series: Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 16))

  • 687 Accesses

Abstract

An investigation of John Wallis’ mathematical practice and his views about the nature of number and its relationship to magnitude will demonstrate that there were several options available to justify the broadening of the number concept and the breakdown in the separation between number and abstract magnitude. One needs to accept the unity of mathematics under geometry in order to accept Barrow’s foundation for number. But for Wallis, arithmetic and the new algebraic techniques had priority over geometry. Moreover, his practice depended a great deal upon numerical patterns and methods. Although Wallis did not state his opinions of continua concepts in as much detail as Barrow, his point of view will provide us with the ideas of a professional mathematician whose practice was mainly algebraic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referencias

  1. J.F. Scott, “The Reverend John Wallis, F.R.S. (1616–1703),” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 15 (1960) p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Wallis, “An Essay of Dr. John Wallis, exhibiting his Hypothesis about the Flux and Reflux of the Sea,” Philosophical Transactions 16 (1666):262–281, is a typical example.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wallis, Treatise of Algebra, p.399.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carl Boyer, The History of the Calculus and its Conceptual Development, p.179 and Chikara Sasaki, “The Acceptance of the Theory of Proportions in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Barrow’s Reaction to the Analytic Mathematics,” Historia Scientiarum 29 (1985), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whiteside, “Patterns,” pp. 187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christoph Scriba, ed. “The Autobiography of John Wallis, F.R.S.,” Notes and Records. Royal Society of London 25 (1970): 27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grammar schools in England in this period did not provide even a rudimentary mathematical education. Such skills were taught outside by self-styled ‘professors’ of mathematics who were usually almanac-makers, astrologers, surveyors, gunners or gaugers. See Taylor, page 9 – 10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scriba, “The Autobiography of John Wallis”, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.F. Scott, The Mathematical Work of John Wallis D.D., F.R.S. (1616–1703) (London: Taylor and Francis, 1938), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hugh Kearney, Scholars and Gentlemen: Universities and Society in Pre-Industrial Britain, 1500–1700 (London: Faber and Faber, 1970), pp. 28 and 63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scriba, “The Autobiography of John Wallis, F.R.S.,” p.27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scriba, “The Autobiography of John Wallis,” p.27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mordechai Feingold, The Mathematicians ‘ Apprenticeship: Science, Universities and Society in England, 1560–1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  14. In A Humble Motion to the Parliament of England Concerning the Advancement of Learning: and a Reformation of the Universities as quoted in Richard Foster Jones’ Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Background of the Battle of the Books (St. Louis: Washington University Press, 1936), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scriba, “The Autobiography of John Wallis,” p.31.

    Google Scholar 

  16. David Eugine Smith, “John Wallis as a Cryptographer”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 24 (1917): pp. 83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. David Kahn, The Codebrakers (New York: Macmillian, 1967), pp. 166–169; See, especially, Peter Pesic, “Secrets, Symbols, and Systems: Parallels between Cryptanalysis and Algebra, 1580–1700” Isis 88 (1997), pp.674–692.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scriba, “The Autobiography of John Wallis,” p.39.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christoph Scriba, Studien zur Mathematik des John Wallis (1616 – 1703) (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1966), p.3. Also see Wallis’ Treatise of Algebra, page 121, where he explains that he afterwards found that his rule was “co-incident with Cardan’s Rules.”

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scriba, Studien, pp. 3–5. 20 Scott, pp.72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Christoph Scriba has explored Wallis’ work with number theory in detail. See his Studien zur Mathematik des John Wallis (1616–1703), especially chapter three “Zaheltheoretische Probleme aus unveröffentlichten Manuskripten.”

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scott, “John Wallis as a Historian of Mathematics,” pp.336–337.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Michael S. Mahoney, “The Beginning of Algebraic Thought in the Seventeenth Century,” in Descartes Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. Stephen Gaukroger (New Jersey: Barnes and Noble, 1980), p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mahoney, “The Beginning of Algebraic Thought,” p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Compare folilo 57 of Euclides The Elements of Geometrie, trans. by H Billingsley, (London, 1570) with Heath’s The Thirteen Books of The Elements (New York: Dover, 1956), Volume I, p. 382.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Billingsley, Euclides The Elements of Geometrie, fo. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The example is, “Take any number as 20, divide into 2 equal partes 10 and 10 and then into two unequal parts 13 and 7..,” the example, although numerical, is given in words — not equations.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Niccoló Tartaglia’s, Euclides Solo introdttore della scientie mathematice: diligentemente reassettato, et alla ridotto per il degno prefessure di tal scientie, (Vinegina, 1543) fo. xxxii.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wallis’ discussion of numbers will be examined in the section of the chapter describing his continua concepts.

    Google Scholar 

  30. At this point in his career, Wallis still respected Descartes. He was especially enthusiastic about Descartes’ exponential notation. See John Wallis, Mathesis Universalis, p. 71 in Opera Mathematica, Vol. 1. His treatment of Book II, however, utilised Oughtred’s symbolism.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Indeed, in his A Defense of the Treatise of the Angle of Contact, p. 99, he says, “we find Euclide’s Geometry (good part of it) employed about Numbers.”

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wallis, Treatise of Algebra, p.90.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Euclid, Elements, p. 382.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wallis, Mathesis Universalis, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wallis, Mathesis Universalis, p. 124. If a straight line (Z) be cut into equal (S,S) and unequal (A, E, or S + V, S-V) segments, the rectangle contained by the unequal segments (AE) of the whole together with the square of the straight line (Vq) between the points of the sections is equal to the square on the half (Sq).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wallis, Mathesis Universalis, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wallis, Mathesis Universalis, p. 124..

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wallis, Treatise, p.114.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wallis, Treatise, p.113.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wallis, Mathesis Universalis, p.69.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Chapter IV pp. 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  42. The date on the title page was 1655, but the work was issued as part two of operum mathematicorum pars altera (Oxford, 1656).

    Google Scholar 

  43. The modern equation for the ellipse, for example, refers to the vertex as origin, i.e. y2 = kx (a ‒ x). Putting ka = p, one obtains y2 = px -(p/a)x2, p is the latus rectum.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Whiteside, “Patterns,” p.295. Wallis, however, did utilise Descartes’ notation, together with some of the symbols of Oughtred, but his explanations are still mainly verbal. Yet Scott, Mathematical Works, p. 24, quotes Hobbes as saying that this work “is so covered with the scab of symbols, that I had not patience to examine whether it were well or ill demonstrated.”

    Google Scholar 

  45. Whiteside, “Patterns,” p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Whiteside, “Patterns,” p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p. 365.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p.366.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p.373.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p.382.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p.389.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p.390.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p.390, as translated in Scott, page 38.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p.392.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Scott, Mathematical Work, pp. 42–46. Scott provides a detailed examination of Wallis’ difficulties.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wallis, Treatise, p.68.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Scott, Mathematical Work, pp. 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Klein, Greek Mathematical Thought, p.211.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wallis, Opera Mathematica, pp. 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Klein, Greek Mathematical Thought, pp. 214–215 for a detailed discussion of this point.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Klein, Greek Mathematical Thought, p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Whiteside, “Patterns,” pp. 187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mahoney, “Barrow’s Mathematics,” p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wallis, Treatise, introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Barrow, p.47. It is interesting that Barrow brings up Wallis’ ideas on this issue.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mahoney, “The Beginning of Algebraic Thought,” p.190.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wallis, Treatise, p.265.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wallis, Treatise, p.317.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wallis, Treatise, p.92.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wallis, Treatise, p.92.

    Google Scholar 

  72. C. Jones, p.47.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wallis, Treatise, p.285.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wallis, Treatise, p.286.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wallis, Treatise, p.305.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Klein, Greek Mathematics, p.220.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Klein, Greek Mathematics, p.223.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wallis, Mathesis universalis, p.57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Katherine Neal

Authors
  1. Katherine Neal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neal, K. (2002). John Wallis. In: From Discrete to Continuous. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0077-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0077-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5993-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0077-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation