Abstract
In the previous chapter I argued that the cooperative virtues are not reasons for unconditional cooperation. We arrived at that conclusion for conceptual reasons as well as for intuitive considerations about compliance with social norms. Finally, we saw that the empirical material1 gathered by psychologists and economists clearly suggests that human agents do not cooperate unconditionally. This is not to say that motives fot unconditional compliant cooperation are not virtuous. They can be, depending on the context in which they emerge. It has been argued, for examlile, that people who rescued Jews from prosecution during the German occupation in Western Europe acted precisely on such unconditional motives and clearly such behavior is virtuous.1 I am not implying either that people who conform to social norms never act from reasons for unconditional cooperation. Maybe people do. However, if one would to know why rational agents comply with a norm because it is the norm, then one should not look to the unconditional reasons for cooperation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verbeek, B. (2002). Motives for Conditional Cooperation: Reciprocity, Trust and Fairness. In: Instrumental Rationality and Moral Philosophy. Theory and Decision Library, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9982-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9982-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6026-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9982-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive