Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which social factors are influential in determining women’s access to cancer screening services in Prince George, British Columbia. Specifically, this study evaluated the association of age, income, education, work status, disability, marital status, and immigrant status with previous use of screening mammography and Pap tests. Data was obtained from the 1994 National Population Health Survey, which contains a sample of 416 women from the Prince George area. A series of logistic regression analyses were used to distinguish ever versus never been screened as well as recency of previous screening. Participation rates in screening mammography in Prince George are comparatively high; however, no association was found between social factors and previous mammography use. This suggests women in Prince George are participating in mammography services regardless of social background. Participation rates in Pap test screening in Prince George are high and are similar to provincial averages; however, while a large percentage of women have been screened, this percentage varies across social groups. Immigrant women, single women, and women with less education are over represented among women who have never had a Pap test. In addition, older women are less likely to obtain a recent Pap test when compared to younger women. This study suggests that certain groups of women in northern British Columbia experience low participation in health services, resulting in a higher risk for poor health and a poor quality of life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beaulieu, M. D., F. Beland, D. Roy, M. Falardeau and G. Hebert: 1996, `Factors determining compliance with screening mammography’, Canadian Medical Association Journal 154 (9), pp. 1335–1343.
British Columbia Provincial Health Officer: 1995, Women’s health feature report’, in A Report on the health of British Columbians: Provincial Health Officers Annual Report 1995 ( Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, Victoria, BC ).
British Columbia Provincial Health Officer: 1996, A Report on the Health of British Columbians: Provincial Health Officers Annual Report 1996 ( Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, Victoria, BC ).
British Columbia Statistics: 1996, Special Feature: BC Immigrant Population, Ethnicity and Language [On-Line]. Available: http://www.bcstats.ca
Calle, E. E., W. D. Flanders, M. J. Thun and L. M. Martin: 1993, ‘Demographic predictors of mammography and pap smear screening in U.S. women’, American Journal of Public Health 83, p. 53.
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, Health Canada: 1994, The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care ( Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa).
Center for Disease Control and Prevention: 1996, CDC Prevention Guidelines: Effectiveness [On-Line]. Available: http://hwcweb.hwc.ca.
Clay, M. G., T. G. Hislop, L. Kan, I. A. Olivotto and L. J. Warren-Burhenne: 1994, `Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988–1993’, The American Journal of Surgery 167, pp. 490–492.
Cohen, J.: 1992, A power primer’, Psychological Bulletin 112 (1), pp. 155–159.
Deschamps, M., P. R. Band, T. G. Hislop, H. F. Clarke, J. M. Smith, V. Ng and M. Math: 1992, `Barriers to cervical cytology screening in native women in British Columbia’, Cancer Detection and Prevention 16 (5/6), pp. 337–339.
Goel, V.: 1994, Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the Ontario Health Survey’, Canadian Journal of Public Health 85, pp. 125–127.
Harper, P.: 1993, Mammography utilization in the poor and medically under-served’, Cancer 72 (4), pp. 1478–1482.
Health Canada: 1998, Cervical Cancer in Canada [On-Line]. Available: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/main/lcdc/web/bc/updates/cervix_e.html
Ives, D. G., J. R. Lave, N. D. Traven, R. Schulz and L. H. Kuller: 1996, ‘Mammography and pap smear use by older rural women’, Public Health Reports 111, pp. 244–250.
Johnson, M. M., T. G. Hislop, L. Kan, A. J. Coldman and A. Lai: 1996, ‘Compliance with the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: will she return?’ Canadian Journal of Public Health 87 (3), pp. 176–179.
Katz, S. J. and T. P. Hofer: 1994, Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage’, JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 272, pp. 530–534.
McKeever, L. and I. M. Martinson: 1986, Older women’s health care’, in D. K. Kjervik and I. M. Martinson (eds.), Women in Health and Illness ( WB Sanders, New York ).
Pender, N. J.: 1987. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice ( Appleton and Lange, Stanford).
Potvin, L., J. Camirand and F. Beland: 1995, `Patterns of health services utilization and mammography use among women aged 50 to 59 years in the Quebec Medicare System’, Medical Care 33 (5), pp. 515–530.
Rimer, B. K., B. Trock, P. F. Engstrom, C. Lerman and E. King: 1991, Why do some women get regular mammograms?’ American Journal of Preventive Medicine 7 (2), pp. 69–74.
Snider, J., J. Beauvais, I. Levy, P. Villenueve and J. Pennock: 1996, Trends in mammography and pap smear utilization in Canada Chronic Diseases in Canada 17(3–4), pp. 108–117.
Statistics Canada: 1995, National Population Health Survey (NPHS): Public Use Microdata File Ddocumentation, 1994–1995 ( Health Statistics Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bryant, J., Browne, A.J., Barton, S., Zumbo, B.D. (2002). Access to Health Care: Social Determinants of Preventive Cancer Screening Use in Northern British Columbia. In: Zumbo, B.D. (eds) Advances in Quality of Life Research 2001. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9970-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9970-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6209-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9970-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive