Abstract
Historically, traditions of rhetorical art and those of dialectic have been charted by scholars somewhat wary of the view each has of its acknowledged counterpart among the arts of discourse. Today, students of argumentation, contemporary heirs of these venerable traditions, have undertaken a congenial reconsideration of the relationships between their respective arts. Prompted in part by Twentieth Century advances in the philosophy of language which bridge their ancient domains, contemporary rhetoricians and dialecticians converse with a renewed understanding that major concerns of each cannot be resolved independent of matters traditionally treated by its counterpart.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Banning, L. (1989). Virginia: Sectionalism and the General Good. In M.A. Gillespie & M. Lienesch (Eds.), Ratifying the Constitution (pp. 261–299). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Bitzer, L.F. (1981). Political Rhetoric. In D. Nimo & K. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 225–248). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Braet, A. (1987). The Classical Doctrine of Status and the Rhetorical Theory of Argumentation. Philosophy and rhetoric 20, 79–93.
Cicero. (1949). De inventione (H.M. Hubbell, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cicero. (1942). De oratore (E.W. Sutton & H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Conley, T.M. (1990). Rhetoric in the European Tradition. New York: Longman.
Dieter, O.A.L. (1950). Stasis. Speech Monographs 17, 345–369.
Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1997). Rhetorical Rationales of Dialectical Moves: Justifying Pragma-Dialectical Reconstructions. In J.F. Klump (Ed.), Argument in a Time of Change: Proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 51–56). Annandale: National Communication Association.
Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Delivering the Goods in Critical Discussion. In F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst & A.J. Blair & CA. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 163–167). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Eemeren, F.H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2000). Rhetorical Analysis within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework: The case of R.J. Reynolds. Argumentation 14, 293–305.
Freeley, A. (1966). Argumentation and Debate: Rational Decision Making (second ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
Govier, T. (1997). Arguing Forever? Or: Two Tiers of Argument Appraisal. In H.V. Hansen & C.W. Tindale & A.V. Colman (Eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric: Proceedings of the Second OSSA Conference. St. Catherines, Ontario: OSSA.
Grice, H.P. (1969). Utterer’s Meaning and Intention. Philosophical Review 78, 147–177.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Hamilton, A. (1993). Alexander Hamilton’s Conjectures about the New Constitution. In B. Bailyn (Ed.), The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters during the Struggle over Ratification (Vol. 1, pp. 9–11). New York: Library Classics of the United States.
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1961). The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library.
Hohmann, H. (2001). Stasis. In T.O. Sloane (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric (pp. 741–745). New York: Oxford University Press.
Houtlosser, P. (1994). The Speech Act ‘Advancing a Standpoint’. In F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Studies in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 165–171). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Houtlosser, P. (1995). Identifying the Point of Argumentation. In F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst & J. A. Blair & CA. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation (Vol. III, 1995, pp. 168–176). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Howell, W.S. (1940). The Positions of Argument: An Historical Examination, Papers in Rhetoric. Saint Louis.
Hultzen, L.S. (1958). Status in Deleberative Analysis, The Rhetorical Idiom: Essays presented to Herbert A. Wichelns (pp. 97–123). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Johnson, R.H. (1996). The rise of Informal Logic. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
Johnson, R.H. (1997). Argumentative Space: Logical and Rhetorical Approaches. In H.V. Hansen & C.W. Tindale & A.V. Colman (Eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric: Proceedings of the Second OSSA Conference. St. Catherines, Ontario: OSSA.
Kaminski, J.P., & Saladino, G.J. (Eds.). (1988). Ratification of the Constitution by the States: Virginia (Vol. VIII–X). Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin.
Kauffeld, F.J. (1997). Comments on Christopher M. Thomson’s, ‘On the Burden of Proof in Ordinary Language Argumentation’. Paper presented at the OSSA conference: Argumentation and Rhetoric, Brock University.
Kauffeld, F.J. (1998). The Good Case for Practical Propositions: Limits of the Arguer’s Obligation to Respond to Objections. In F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst & J.A. Blair, & CA. Willard (Eds.), Fourth ISSA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 439–444). University of Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Kauffeld, F.J. (1998). Presumption and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing. Argumentation 12, 245–266.
Kauffeld, F.J. (1999). Arguments on the Dialectical Tier as Structured by Proposing and Advising. In C.W. Tindale & H.V. Hansen & E. Sveda (Eds.), Argumentation at the Century’s Turn: Proceedings of the Third OSSA Conference. St. Catharines: OSSA.
Kauffeld, F.J. (2001). Argumentation, Discourse, and the Rationality Underlying Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning. In Eniko Nemeth T. (Ed.), Cognition in Language Use: Selected Papers from the 7th international Pragmatics Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 149–163). Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
Kauffeld, F.J. (2001a). Grice without the Cooperative Principle. Paper presented at the Fourth OSSA Conference: Argumentation and its Applications, Windsor, Ontario.
Kauffeld, F.J. (2001b). Utterances as Speech Acts. In T. Sloane (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric: Oxford, University Press.
Kenyon, C.M. (Ed.). (1966). The Antifederalists. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Kline, S. (1979). Toward a Contemporary Linguistic Interpretation of the Concept of Stasis. JAFA 18, 95–103.
Leff, M. (2000). Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century. Argumentation 14, 241–254.
Nadeau, R. (1964). Hermogenes on Stasis: A Translation with an Introduction. Speech Monographs 31, 363–386.
Quintilian. (1920). Institutio oratoria (H. E. Butler, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
A Revolution Effected by Good Sense and Deliberation. (1993). In B. Bailyn (Ed.), The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters during the Struggle over Ratification (Vol. 1, pp. 12–14). New York: Library Classics of the United States.
Rhetorica ad Herennium. (H. Caplan, Trans.) (1954). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stampe, D. (1967). On the Acoustic Behavior of Rational Animals. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
Stampe, D. (1970). Making Promises. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
Stampe, D. (1975). Meaning and Truth in the Theory of Speech Acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Ed.), Speech Acts (Vol. 3, pp. 25–38). New York: Academic Press.
Strawson, P.F. (1964). Intention and Convention in Speech Acts. Philosophical Review 73, 439–460.
Warnock, G.J. (1971). The object of Morality. London: Methuen and Co.
Warnock, G.J. (1973). Some Types of Performative Utterance, Essays on J. L. Austin (pp. 69–90). Oxord: Clarendon Press.
Whately, R. (1963). Elements of Rhetoric (reprint edition ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
Wilson, J. (1993). Everything which is Not Given, is Reserved. In B. Bailyn (Ed.), The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters during the Struggle over Ratification (Vol. 1, pp. 63–69). New York: Library Classics of the United States.
Wohlrapp, H. (1995). Resolving the Riddle of the Non-Deductive Argumentation Schemes. In F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst & J.A. Blair & CA. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. II (1995, pp. 55–62). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Wohlrapp, H. (1997). Some remarks on non-deductive argument. In J.F. Klumpp (Ed.), Argument in a time of change: Proceedings of the tenth NCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 24–30). Alta, Utah: National Communication Association.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kauffeld, F.J. (2002). Pivotal Issues and Norms in Rhetorical Theories of Argumentation. In: Van Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P. (eds) Dialectic and Rhetoric. Argumentation Library, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6057-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9948-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive