Abstract
This study explored the conceptual and communicative roles of gesture by examining the consequences of gesture prevention for the type of spatial language used to solve a spatial problem. English speakers were asked to describe where to place a group of blocks so that the blocks completely filled a puzzle grid. Half the subjects were allowed to gesture and half were prevented from gesturing. In addition, half the subjects could see their addressee and half could not. Addressee visibility affected how reliant subjects were on specifying puzzle grid co-ordinates, regardless of gesture condition. However, when describing block locations, subjects who were allowed to gesture were more likely to describe block orientation and rotation. Further, gesture and speech complemented each other such that subjects were less likely to lexically specify rotation direction when this information was expressed by gesture, but this was not a conscious communicative choice because subjects who were not visible to their addressee also tended to leave rotation direction unspecified when they gestured. We argue that the complementary integration of information in gesture and speech occurred as a result of the expression of thought rather than as a result of communicative intent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cohen, A. A. (1977). The communicative function of hand illustrators. Journal of Communication, 27, 54–63.
Cohen, A. & Harrison, R. P. (1973). Intentionality in the use of hand illustrators in face-to-face communication situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 276–279.
Emmorey, K., & Casey, S. (1995). A comparison of spatial language in English and American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 88, 255–288.
Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (Ed.) Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141, Toronto: Hogrefe.
Lewin, M. R., McNeil, D. R., & Lipson, J. M. (1996) Enduring without avoiding: Pauses and verbal dysfluencies in public speaking fear. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 18(4), 387–402.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What gestures reveal about thought. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7(4), 226–231.
St. John, M. (1992) Learning language in the service of a task. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emmorey, K., Casey, S. (2002). Gesture, Thought, and Spatial Language. In: Coventry, K.R., Olivier, P. (eds) Spatial Language. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9928-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9928-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5910-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9928-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive