Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multidimensional Measurements and Approaches to Forest Sustainability Assessments

An overview of models, approaches, and issues

  • Chapter
Multi-objective Forest Planning

Part of the book series: Managing Forest Ecosystems ((MAFE,volume 6))

Abstract

This article provides an overview of concepts, models, measures, and dimensions of forest sustainability assessments. The methods described include models that are fully developed and have actually been applied to various application contexts, as well as two normative models, graph theory and cognitive mapping, that appear to have potential for more in-depth analysis of the interactions of sustainability indicators. The former is based on the principles of multi-criteria analysis (MCA), an approach that is capable of accommodating the amount of complexity and uncertainty inherent in the concept and practice of forest sustainability. The other methods make use of “softer” analyses that are suited particularly for the assessment and measurement of qualitative indicators of sustainability. The MCA models are capable of determining relative importance of indicators and estimating sustainability index values based on the combined impacts of indicators. Measures of relative importance can be used to prioritise indicators or filter out those that are relatively unimportant. ‘Softer’ analysis methods such as cognitive mapping and graph theory can help examine the interactions between and among indicators and help identify critical domains, critical paths, and tactically and strategically important indicators, based on the strength of their connectivity with other indicators, either directly or indirectly. These measures of connectivity can provide useful insights that can help managers identify indicators in need of attention, monitoring, or even mitigation when necessary. Concepts such as the use of sustainability thresholds and qualitative flags are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AF&PA (American Forest and Paper Association). 1995. Sustainable forestry: principles and implementation guidelines. Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. and Morse, S. 1999. Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable. Earthscan Publications Ltd. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller, C., Girardin, P. and van der Werf, H.M.G. 1997. Use of agroecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy 7: 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brlacich, M., Bryant, C.R and Smith, B. 1991. Review and appraisal of concept of food production systems. Environmental Management. 15 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Scientists. 1999. Sustaining the people’s lands: Recommendations for stewardship of the national forests and grasslands into the next century. Washington, D.C. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G.R. 1994. Sustainability in agricultural development: trade-offs with productivity, stability and equitability. Journal of Farming Systems Research Extensions 4 (2): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, I.S. 1999. Selecting indicators for assessing sustainable land management. Journal of Environmental Management 56: 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Norton, B. and Haskell, B.D. 1992. Ecosystem Health: New goals for Environmental Management. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramb, R.A. 1993. Shifting cultivation and sustainable agriculture in East Malaysia: A longitudinal study. Agricultural Systems. 42: 209–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducey, M.J. and Larson, B.C. 1999. A fuzzy approach to the problem of sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 115: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and Akermann, F. 1998. Making Strategy: The journey of strategic management. Sage Publications. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSC (Forestry Stewardship Council). 1994. Forestry Stewardship Principles and Criteria for Natural Forest Management. Oaxaca, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froger, G. and Munda, G. 1998. Methodology for environmental decision support. In: Faucheux, S. and

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. (Eds.). Valuation for Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. 1991. Economic measures of sustainability. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 39: 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J.W. 1996. Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agricultural Systems. 50: 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J.T. 1994. Emerging, diverging and converging paradigms on sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development, World Ecology 1: 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanidez, G. Nijkamp, P. 1998. Multicriteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural land use: A case study of Lesvos. In: Beinat E. and Nijkamp. P. (Eds.). Multicriteria Analysis for Land Use Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikerd, J.E. 1993. The need for a systems approach to sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 46: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (International Standardization Organization). 1995. Environmental Ecolabelling: guiding principles, practices and criteria for multiple criteria-based practitioner programs. Guides for Certification Procedures. Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITTO (International Timber Trade Organization). 1992. Criteria for the measurement of sustainable tropical forest management. Yokohama, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUFRO (International Union of Forestry Research Organization). 1997. Symposium on sustainable Management of Small Scale Forestry. Murashima, Japan. September 8–13, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. 1991. Soil structure and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture: 67–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamnerts V.B., E.M. and Blom, F. 1997. Hierarchical framework for the formulation of sustainable forest management standards. Netherlands, Veeman Druckers. 82 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mebratu, D. 1998. Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environmental Impact Assessment Reviews: 493–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G. A. 1997. An introduction to the analytic hierarchy process: Theory and applications to natural resources management. National Annual Conference. In: Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting of the

    Google Scholar 

  • American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM); American Association of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS); and Resources Technology Institute (RTI). April 5–10. Seattle, WA. Pp. 130139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.A., Prabhu, R. 2000a. Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing Forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: A Case Study. Forest Ecology and Management 131: 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G. A. and Prabhu, R. 2000b. Evaluating and Selecting Criteria and Indicators for Forest sustainability: A Case Study on Participatory Assessment under CBFM in the Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management 2 (2): 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. 2000c. Integrating multiple criteria decision making and geographic information systems for assessing sustainability of tropical forests. 2°d International Conference on Multiple Objective Decision Support Systems. Proceedings: MODSS for Managing Watersheds and Natural Resources. Brisbane, Australia. Aug. 1–6. 1999. (In Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. 2000d. Multiple criteria analysis for assessing criteria and indicators in sustainable forest management: A case study on participatory decision making in a Kalimantan forest. Environmental Management 26 (6): 659–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.A., Hartanto, H., Villanueva, T. and Prabhu, R. 2001. Multicriteria and Critical Threshold Value Analyses in Assessing Sustainable Forestry: A Case Study. Journal of Sustainable Forestry (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. 2001. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for assessing biodiversity conservation. In: Schmoldt, D., Kangas, J., Mendoza, G. and Pesonen, M. (Eds.). The Analytic Hierarchy Proces in Natural Resources and Environmental Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. Pp. 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. 2002. Qualitative multi-criteria approach to assessing indicators of sustainable resource management. Forest Ecology and Management (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G. 1998. Multicriteria evaluation methods in renewable management: integrated water management under drought conditions. In: Beinat, E. and Nijkamp, P. (Eds.). Multicriteria Analysis for Land-use Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neher, D. 1992. Ecological sustainability in agricultural systems: definition and measurement. In: Olson, R.K. (Ed.) Integrating Sustainable agriculture, Ecology, and Environmental Policy. Haworth Press Inc. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. and Vreeker, R. 1999. Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand. Ecological Economics 33: 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. and Ouwersloot, H. 1997. A decision support system for regional sustainable development: The Flag Model. In: van der Bergh, J.C.J.M. and Hofkes, M. (Eds). Theory and implementation of sustainable development modeling. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council Board of Agriculture). 1998. Forested landscapes in perspective: Prospects and opportunities for sustainable management of America’s nonfederal forests. National Academy Press. Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Pelt, M.J.F., Kuyvenhoven, A. and Nijkamp, P. 1995. Environmental sustainability: issues and definition and measurement. International Journal of Environmental Pollution 5 (2/3): 204–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore, D. 1990. Sustainability in the tropical forest. Journal of the Institute of Wood Sciences 12 (2): 103–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, R., Colfer, C., Venkateswarlu, P., Tan, L.C., Soekmadi, R. and Wollenberg, E. 1996. Testing Criteria and Indicators for the sustainable management of forests. Phase I. Final Report. CIFOR Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, R., Colfer, C. and Dudley, R.G. 1998. Guidelines for Developing, Testing and Selecting Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. CIFOR Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, R., Ruitenbeek, H.J., Boyle, T.J.B. and Colfer, C.J.P. 2001. Between voodoo science and adaptive management: the role and research needs for indicators of sustainable forest management. In: Raison, J., Brown, A., Flinn, D. (Eds.). Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. CABI Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renning, K. and Wiggering, H. 1997. Steps towards indicators of sustainable development: linking economic and ecological concepts. Ecological Economics 20: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. 1995. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Complex World. RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. 1996. MultiCriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. University of Pittsburgh. Sample, A. and Aplet, G.H. 1994. Defining sustainable forestry. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, D.C. SCS (Scientific Certification Systems). 1994. The Forest Conservation Program: Programme Description and Operations Manual. California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoldt, D., Kangas, J., Mendoza, G. and Pesonen, M. (Eds.). 2001. The Analytic Hierarchy Proces in Natural Resources and Environmental Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. 305 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SGS Forestry. 1994. Assessors Handbook, Policy Document and Procedures Manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • SGS Forestry, Oxford, UK. Spedding, C.R.W. Sustainability in animal production systems. Journal of Animal Science 61: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torquebiau, P.B. 1992. Are tropical agroforestry gardens sustainable? Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment. 41: 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udo, H.M.J. and Cornelissen, A. 1998. Livestock in resource poor farming systems. Agricultural Outlook 27(4): 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma, V.K., Ferguson, I. and Wild, I. 2000. Decision support system for sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 128: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavra, M. 1996. Sustainability of animal production systems: an ecological perspective. Journal of Animal Science 74(6): 1418–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, H. and Kuik, O. 1991. Indicators of sustainable development: An overview. In: Kuik, O. and Verbruggen, H. (Eds.). In search of indicators of sustainable development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, K.A., Larson, B., Gordon, J., Vogt, D. and Fanzeres, A. 1999. Forest Certification: Roots, Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, R.B., Harris, H.J., Sivanpillai, R. and Devault, D.S. 1999. A graph-theoretic analysis of relationships among ecosystem stressors. Journal of Environmental Management 57: 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information Control. 8: 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA

    Guillermo A. Mendoza

  2. Center for International Forestry Research, Harare, Zimbabwe

    Ravi Prabhu

Authors
  1. Guillermo A. Mendoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravi Prabhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Joensuu, Finland

    Timo Pukkala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendoza, G.A., Prabhu, R. (2002). Multidimensional Measurements and Approaches to Forest Sustainability Assessments. In: Pukkala, T. (eds) Multi-objective Forest Planning. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9906-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9906-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6207-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9906-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation