Abstract
For Europe, the turn of the century has meant the end of a decisive decade full of hopes and disappointments. The euphoria following the events that unfolded in the eastern countries at the end of the 1980’s, symbolized by the fall of the Berlin Wall, was in turn followed by a much lower moment of European ideals, worsened by the uncertainty that usually follows ‘revolutionary’ processes (Dahrendorf, 1991), by the recurrent war in former Yugoslavia, the return of xenophobic attitudes and neo-fascist movements, political scandals, economic ups and downs, etc. In this irresolute context, the European Union has often been perceived by the citizens of its Member States as a distant bureaucracy that affects our daily lives through regulations, taxes, the currency we use to buy and sell,... and yet we fail to see ourselves reflected in its decisions. Those who drew up the Treaty of the European Union signed in Maastricht in February 1992 were well aware of this ‘democratic deficit’ and largely responded to it with the Treaty’s appeal to the principle of subsidiarity. It is also probably part and parcel of the new role that the Treaty conceded to education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bárcena, F., Gil, F. & Jover, G. (1999). La escuela de la ciudadanía. Educación, ética y política. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
Barea, M.T. & Murillo, E. (2000). Principio de subsidiariedad y déficit democrático, factores claves en el debate sobre la atribución de competencias a la Unión Europea. Noticias de la Unión Europea, 182, 9–23.
Bermann, G.A. (1994). Taking Subsidiarity Seriously: Federalism in the European Community and the United States. Columbia Law Review, 94 (2), 331–456.
Bribosia, H. (1992). Subsidiarité et répartition des compétences entre la Communauté et ses États membres. Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 4, 165–188.
Bribosia, H. (1998). De la subsidiarité á la coopération renforcée. In Y. Lejeune (ed.), Le Traité d’Amsterdam. Espoirs et déceptions (pp. 23–92). Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Brittan, L. (1992). Le rôle de la subsidiarité dans le fonctionnement de la C.E. Information a la Presse, 447, 1–4
Bru, C.M. (1994). La ciudadanía europea. Madrid: Sistema.
Búrca, G. de (2000). Proportionality and Subsidiarity as General Principles of Law. In U. Bernitz & J. Nergelius (eds.), General Principles of European Community Law (pp. 95112). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Calonge, A. & Sanz, I. (2000). El Comité de las Regiones. Análisis de una ¿ futura institución? Granada: Comares.
Cass, D.Z. (1992). The Word that Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community. Common Market Law Review, 29 (6), 1107–1136.
Charpentier, J. (1994). Quelle subsidiarité? Pouvoirs, 69, 49–62.
Common Market Law Review Editorial Comments (1993). Subsidiarity: Backing the right horse? Common Market Law Review, 30 (2), 241–245.
Constantinesco, V. (1997). Les clauses de «coopération renforcée». Le protocole sur l’application des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, 33 (4), 751–767
Dahl, R.A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahrendorf, R. (1991). Reflexiones sobre la revolución en Europa. Barcelona: Emecé.
Delors, J. (1991). The Principle of Subsidiarity: Contribution to the Debate. In European Institute of Public Administration, Subsidiarity: The Challenge of Change. Proceedings of the Jacques Delors Colloquium (pp. 7–18). Maastricht: EIPA
Also in J. Delors (1993), El nuevo concierto europeo (pp. 131–143). Madrid: Acento.
Delors, J. (1993). Reconciliar el ideal y la necesidad. In author, El nuevo concierto europeo (pp. 271–293). Madrid: Acento.
Delors, J. (1994). L’Unité d’un homme. Entretiens avec Dominique Wolton. Paris: O. Jacob.
Delors, J. (1998). Prôlogo. In P. de Schoutheete, Una Europa para todos. Diez ensayos sobre la construcción europea (pp. 11–15). Madrid: Alianza.
Duff, A. (1993). Towards a Definition of Subsidiarity. In A. Duff (ed.), Subsidiarity within the European Union (pp. 7–32). London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.
Duff, A. (1997). Subsidiarity. In A. Duff (ed.), The Treaty ofAmsterdam. Text and Commentary (pp. 96–106). London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.
Ehlermann, C.D. (1992). Quelques réflexions sur la communication de la Commission relative au principle de subsidiarité. Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 4, 215–220.
Feral, P.A. (1998). Le principe de subsidiarité: progrès ou statu quo après le Traitè d’Amsterdam? Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 1, 95–117.
Fernández Esteban, M.J. (1996). El principio de subsidiariedad en el ordenamiento europeo. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Gautron, J.C. et al. (1998). La subsidiarité. Revue des Affaires Européennes, 1 and 2.
General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union (1996). Intergovernmental Conference Reflection Group Report and other References for Documentary Purposes. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Gimeno, C. (1999). El principio de subsidiariedad. Aportaciones del Tratado de Amsterdam. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 29, 105–124.
Giscard D’Estaing, V. (1992) Alocución en las Jornadas de Estudio del Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo. In Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo, Subsidiariedad, ampliación, democratización (pp. 32–36). Bruselas: PPE.
Groof, J. de (1994). The Scope and Distinction between Art. 126 and 127 of the Treaty on European Union and the Implementation of the Subsidiarity Principle. In J. de Groof (ed.), Subsidiarity and Education. Aspects of Comparative Educational Law (pp. 77–114). Leuven: Acco.
Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo (1992). Subsidiariedad, ampliación, democratización. Bruselas: PPE.
Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría y praxis. Madrid: Tecnos.
Habermas, J. (1999). The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
Hearl, D. (1995). Subsidiarity, the Public and the EU Credibility Gap. Hull: Centre for European Union Studies.
Jones, J. (1997). The Committee of the Regions, Subsidiarity and a Warning. European Law Review, 22 (4), 312–326.
Jover, G. (1995). La idea de tolerancia en el proyecto educativo de la Unión Europea. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 53 (201), 225–247.
Kersbergen, K. Van (1995). Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London and New York: Routledge.
Kersbergen, K. van & Verbeek, B. (1994). The Politics of Subsidiarity in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32 (2), 215–236.
Laursen, F. (1997). The lessons of Maastricht. In G. Edwards and & A. Pijpers (eds.), The Politics of European Treaty Reform (pp. 59–73). London and Washington: Pinter.
Ludlow, P. (2001). 2004 and Beyond. A View from Brussels. Retrieved, September 10th, 2001, from http://europe.eu.int/futurum/documents/contrib/cont220801.pdf
Martens, W. (1992). L’Europe depuis Maastricht. In W. Martens (1994), L’une & l’autre Europe, pp. 144–149, Racine, Bruxelles. Also in Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo (1992), Subsidiariedad, arnpliación, democratización (pp. 6–11). Bruselas: PPE.
Millon-Delsol, C. (1992). L’Etat subsidiaire. Paris: Presses Universitaries de France.
Parijs, P. Van (1993). Qué es una sociedadjusta? Barcelona: Ariel.
Partido Popular Europeo (1990). Por una Constitución Federal de la Unión Europea. Bilbao: E.A.J.-P.N.V.
Pérez González, M. (1998). La subsidiariedad. In M. Oreja & F. Fonseca (eds.), El Tratado de Amsterdam. Análisis y comentarios (vol. 1) (pp. 167–183). Madrid: McGraw Hill.
Schoutheete, P. de (1998). Una Europa para todos. Diez ensayos sobre la construcción europea. Madrid: Alianza.
Sidjanski, D. (1998). El futuro federalista de Europa. Barcelona: Ariel.
Taylor, C. (1991). The Ethics ofAuthenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Toth, A.G. (1992). The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Maastricht Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 29 (6), 1079–1105.
Walzer, M. (1996). Moralidad en el ámbito local e internacional. Madrid: Alianza.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1997). Legitimacy and Democracy of Union Governance. In G. Edwards & A. Pijpers (eds.), The Politics of European Treaty Reform (pp. 249–287). London and Washington: Pinter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jover, G. (2002). Rethinking Subsidiarity as a Principle of Educational Policy in the European Union. In: Ibáñez-Martín, J.A., Jover, G. (eds) Education in Europe: Policies and Politics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9864-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9864-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6102-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9864-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive