Skip to main content

Rethinking Subsidiarity as a Principle of Educational Policy in the European Union

  • Chapter
Education in Europe: Policies and Politics

Abstract

For Europe, the turn of the century has meant the end of a decisive decade full of hopes and disappointments. The euphoria following the events that unfolded in the eastern countries at the end of the 1980’s, symbolized by the fall of the Berlin Wall, was in turn followed by a much lower moment of European ideals, worsened by the uncertainty that usually follows ‘revolutionary’ processes (Dahrendorf, 1991), by the recurrent war in former Yugoslavia, the return of xenophobic attitudes and neo-fascist movements, political scandals, economic ups and downs, etc. In this irresolute context, the European Union has often been perceived by the citizens of its Member States as a distant bureaucracy that affects our daily lives through regulations, taxes, the currency we use to buy and sell,... and yet we fail to see ourselves reflected in its decisions. Those who drew up the Treaty of the European Union signed in Maastricht in February 1992 were well aware of this ‘democratic deficit’ and largely responded to it with the Treaty’s appeal to the principle of subsidiarity. It is also probably part and parcel of the new role that the Treaty conceded to education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bárcena, F., Gil, F. & Jover, G. (1999). La escuela de la ciudadanía. Educación, ética y política. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea, M.T. & Murillo, E. (2000). Principio de subsidiariedad y déficit democrático, factores claves en el debate sobre la atribución de competencias a la Unión Europea. Noticias de la Unión Europea, 182, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermann, G.A. (1994). Taking Subsidiarity Seriously: Federalism in the European Community and the United States. Columbia Law Review, 94 (2), 331–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bribosia, H. (1992). Subsidiarité et répartition des compétences entre la Communauté et ses États membres. Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 4, 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bribosia, H. (1998). De la subsidiarité á la coopération renforcée. In Y. Lejeune (ed.), Le Traité d’Amsterdam. Espoirs et déceptions (pp. 23–92). Bruxelles: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittan, L. (1992). Le rôle de la subsidiarité dans le fonctionnement de la C.E. Information a la Presse, 447, 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bru, C.M. (1994). La ciudadanía europea. Madrid: Sistema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Búrca, G. de (2000). Proportionality and Subsidiarity as General Principles of Law. In U. Bernitz & J. Nergelius (eds.), General Principles of European Community Law (pp. 95112). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calonge, A. & Sanz, I. (2000). El Comité de las Regiones. Análisis de una ¿ futura institución? Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, D.Z. (1992). The Word that Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community. Common Market Law Review, 29 (6), 1107–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charpentier, J. (1994). Quelle subsidiarité? Pouvoirs, 69, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Market Law Review Editorial Comments (1993). Subsidiarity: Backing the right horse? Common Market Law Review, 30 (2), 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinesco, V. (1997). Les clauses de «coopération renforcée». Le protocole sur l’application des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, 33 (4), 751–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1991). Reflexiones sobre la revolución en Europa. Barcelona: Emecé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1991). The Principle of Subsidiarity: Contribution to the Debate. In European Institute of Public Administration, Subsidiarity: The Challenge of Change. Proceedings of the Jacques Delors Colloquium (pp. 7–18). Maastricht: EIPA

    Google Scholar 

  • Also in J. Delors (1993), El nuevo concierto europeo (pp. 131–143). Madrid: Acento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1993). Reconciliar el ideal y la necesidad. In author, El nuevo concierto europeo (pp. 271–293). Madrid: Acento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1994). L’Unité d’un homme. Entretiens avec Dominique Wolton. Paris: O. Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1998). Prôlogo. In P. de Schoutheete, Una Europa para todos. Diez ensayos sobre la construcción europea (pp. 11–15). Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. (1993). Towards a Definition of Subsidiarity. In A. Duff (ed.), Subsidiarity within the European Union (pp. 7–32). London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. (1997). Subsidiarity. In A. Duff (ed.), The Treaty ofAmsterdam. Text and Commentary (pp. 96–106). London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlermann, C.D. (1992). Quelques réflexions sur la communication de la Commission relative au principle de subsidiarité. Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 4, 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feral, P.A. (1998). Le principe de subsidiarité: progrès ou statu quo après le Traitè d’Amsterdam? Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 1, 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Esteban, M.J. (1996). El principio de subsidiariedad en el ordenamiento europeo. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautron, J.C. et al. (1998). La subsidiarité. Revue des Affaires Européennes, 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union (1996). Intergovernmental Conference Reflection Group Report and other References for Documentary Purposes. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, C. (1999). El principio de subsidiariedad. Aportaciones del Tratado de Amsterdam. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 29, 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giscard D’Estaing, V. (1992) Alocución en las Jornadas de Estudio del Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo. In Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo, Subsidiariedad, ampliación, democratización (pp. 32–36). Bruselas: PPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groof, J. de (1994). The Scope and Distinction between Art. 126 and 127 of the Treaty on European Union and the Implementation of the Subsidiarity Principle. In J. de Groof (ed.), Subsidiarity and Education. Aspects of Comparative Educational Law (pp. 77–114). Leuven: Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo (1992). Subsidiariedad, ampliación, democratización. Bruselas: PPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría y praxis. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1999). The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearl, D. (1995). Subsidiarity, the Public and the EU Credibility Gap. Hull: Centre for European Union Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1997). The Committee of the Regions, Subsidiarity and a Warning. European Law Review, 22 (4), 312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jover, G. (1995). La idea de tolerancia en el proyecto educativo de la Unión Europea. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 53 (201), 225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, K. Van (1995). Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, K. van & Verbeek, B. (1994). The Politics of Subsidiarity in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32 (2), 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, F. (1997). The lessons of Maastricht. In G. Edwards and & A. Pijpers (eds.), The Politics of European Treaty Reform (pp. 59–73). London and Washington: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (2001). 2004 and Beyond. A View from Brussels. Retrieved, September 10th, 2001, from http://europe.eu.int/futurum/documents/contrib/cont220801.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, W. (1992). L’Europe depuis Maastricht. In W. Martens (1994), L’une & l’autre Europe, pp. 144–149, Racine, Bruxelles. Also in Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo (1992), Subsidiariedad, arnpliación, democratización (pp. 6–11). Bruselas: PPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon-Delsol, C. (1992). L’Etat subsidiaire. Paris: Presses Universitaries de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parijs, P. Van (1993). Qué es una sociedadjusta? Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partido Popular Europeo (1990). Por una Constitución Federal de la Unión Europea. Bilbao: E.A.J.-P.N.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez González, M. (1998). La subsidiariedad. In M. Oreja & F. Fonseca (eds.), El Tratado de Amsterdam. Análisis y comentarios (vol. 1) (pp. 167–183). Madrid: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoutheete, P. de (1998). Una Europa para todos. Diez ensayos sobre la construcción europea. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidjanski, D. (1998). El futuro federalista de Europa. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1991). The Ethics ofAuthenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, A.G. (1992). The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Maastricht Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 29 (6), 1079–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1996). Moralidad en el ámbito local e internacional. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H. (1997). Legitimacy and Democracy of Union Governance. In G. Edwards & A. Pijpers (eds.), The Politics of European Treaty Reform (pp. 249–287). London and Washington: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jover, G. (2002). Rethinking Subsidiarity as a Principle of Educational Policy in the European Union. In: Ibáñez-Martín, J.A., Jover, G. (eds) Education in Europe: Policies and Politics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9864-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9864-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6102-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9864-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics