Abstract
Environmental problems, such as pollution or the destruction of forests, are among the most serious challenges of today’s society. In recent years, increasing emphasis has been given to global phenomena, such as ozone layer depletion and climate change (e.g., Rayner and Malone, 1998a). These phenomena constitute global environmental risks, and it is one of the major problems for scientists as well as for policy makers how to assess, communicate, and manage these risks. Many of these environmental problems are anthropogenic, that is, they originate from human activities. Hence, the ultimate causes of global risks can be found in decision making processes -- on individual, organisational, and societal levels -- that lead to environmentally relevant behavior. Environmental problems arise from the fact that many individual choices are detrimental for the environment in the long run, such as car driving or overfishing, but are hard to change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amabile, T. M., and Conti, R. (1997). Environmental determinants of work motivation, creativity, and innovation: The case of RandD downsizing. In R. Garud and P. R. Nayyar (Eds.), Technological innovation: Oversights and foresight.s (pp. l 1 1–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Axelrod, L. J. (1994). Balancing personal needs with environmental preservation: Identifying the values that guide decisions in ecological dilemmas. Journal of Social issues, 50, 85–104.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation, New York: Basic Books.
Baron, J. (1994). Thinking and deciding ( 2nd ed. ). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Baron, J., and Spranca, M. (1997). Protected Values. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70 (1), 1–16.
Bazerman, M. H., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., and Benzoni, F. J. (1996). Environmental degradation: Exploring the rift between environmentally benign attitudes and environmentally destructive behaviors. In D. M. Messick and A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of Conduct (pp. 256–274 ). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts, Chichester: Wiley. Beattie, J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., and Spranca, M. D. (1994). Psychological determinants of decision attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 129–144.
Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., and Tversky, A. (1988). Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa and A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making (pp. 9–30 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Böhm, G., and Mader, S. (1998). Subjektive kausale Szenarien globaler Umweltveränderungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 270–285.
Böhm, G., and Pfister, H.-R. (1996). Instrumental or emotional evaluations: What determines preferences? Acta Psychologica, 93, 135–148.
Böhm, G., Rost, J., and Spada, H. (1998). Psychologische Aspekte von Umweltrisiken. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 243–250. [Psychological aspects of environmental risks]
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., and Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 959–970.
Carnevale, P. J. D., and Isen, A. M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 113.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain, New York: Putnam. Dawes, R. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.
Dawes, R., van de Kragt, A. J. C., and Orbell, J. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83–97.
De Bono, E. (1967). Lateral thinking. A textbook of creativity. London: Ward Lock Educational Ltd.
Diehl, M., and Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.
Dunlap, R. E., and van Liere, D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.
Eckensberger, L. H., Sieloff, U., Kasper, E., Schirk, S., and Nieder, A. (1992). Psychologische Analyse eines Okonomie-Ökologie-Konflikts in einer saarländischen Region: Kohlekraftwerk Bexbach. In K. Pawlik and K. H. Stapf (Eds.), Umwelt und Verhalten: Perspektiven und Ergebnisse ökopsychologischer Forschung (pp. 145–168 ). Bern: Hans Huber.
Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417.
Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes: Studies of the subversion of rationality,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ernst, A. M. (1998). Psychologie des Umweltverhaltens. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, (4),70–75.
Femers, S. (1993). Information über technische Risiken. Zur Rolle der fehlenden direkten Erfdhrbarkeit von Risiken and den Effekten abstrakter und konkreter Informationen, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fiske, A. P., and Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18, 255–297.
Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions with reason: The strategic role of the emotions_ New York: Norton.
Frijda, N. H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 115–143.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hammond, P. H. (1988). Consequentialist foundations for expected utility. Theory and Decision, 25, 25–78. Hardin, G. R. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science. 162, 1243–1248.
Hendrickx, L., van den Berg, A., and Vlek, C. (1993). Zorgen over morgen? De factor ‘tijd’ in de evaluatie van milieurisco’s. Milieu, 8, 148–152.
Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgment and choice,Wiley: Chichester (2nd edition).
Hohenemser, C., Kasperson, R. E., and Kates, R, W. (1985). Causal structure. In R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser and J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology (pp. 25–42 ). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., and Webler, T. (1998). Decision analysis and rational action. In S. Rayner and E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice und climate change (Vol. 3, pp. 141–215). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. Jungermann, H. (1985). Inferential processes in the construction of scenarios. Journal of Forecasting, 4, 321–327. Jungermann, H., Pfister, H.-R., and Fischer, K. (1998). Die Psychologie der Entscheidung, Heidelberg: SpektrumAkademischer Verlag.
Jungermann, H., and Thüring, M. (1987). The use of mental models for generating scenarios. In G. Wright and P. Ayton (Eds.), Judgmental Forecasting. New York: Wiley.
Jungermann, H., von Ulardt, I., and Hausmann, L. (1983). The role of the goal for generating actions. hi P. Humphreys, O. Svenson and A. Vari (Eds.), Analysing and aiding decision processes (pp. 223–236 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kahneman, D., and Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57–70.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47,263291.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
Kals, E., and Montada, L. (1994). Umweltschutz und die Verantwortung der Burger. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 326–337.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value focused thinking. A path to creative decision making, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kempton, W. (1991). Lay perspectives on global climate change. Global Environmental Change, I, 183–208. Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica, 28, 287–309.
Kruse, L. (1995). Globale Umweltveränderungen: Eine Herausforderung für die Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 46, 81–92.
Levi, I. (1986). Hard choices. Decision making under unresolved conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lichtenstein, S., Gregory, R., Slovic, P., and Wagenaar, W. A. (1990). When lives are in your hands: Dilemmas of the societal decision maker. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making. A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 91–106 ). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Loewenstein, G., and Elster, J. (Eds.). (1992). Choice over time, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Logue, A. W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 665–679.
Lopes, L. L. (1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255–295.
Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions, New York: Wiley.
McDaniels, T., Axelrod, L. J., and Slovic, P. (1995). Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Analy.sis, 15, 575–609.
Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology: The search fòra livable world, New York: Routledge.
Nel, W., Helmreich, R. L., and Aronson, E. (1969). Opinion change in the advocate as a function of the persuasibility of his audience: A clarification of the meaning of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 227–236.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., and Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Osborn, A. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Charles Scribner’s.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parson, E. A., and Ward, H. (1998). Games and simulations. In S. Rayner and E. L. Malone (Eds.). Human choice and climate change_ Vol. 3 (pp. 105–139 ). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Pawlik, K. (1991). The psychology of global environmental change: Some basic data and an agenda for cooperative international research. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 547–563.
Pfister, H.-R. (1991). Struktur und Funktion von Zielen in diachronischen Entscheidungen, Frankfurt/M.: Lang.
Pfister, H.-R., and Böhm, G. (1992). The function of concrete emotions in rational decision making. Acta Psychologica, 80, I99–21 I.
Rayner, S., and Malone, E. L. (1998a). (Eds.). Human choice and climate change. Vols. 1–4. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Rayner, S., and Malone, E. L. (1998b). Social science insights into climate change. In S. Rayner and E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change. Vol. 4 (pp. 71–107 ). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Ritov, I., and Kahneman, D. (1997). How people value the environment: Attitudes versus economic values. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel and K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, Ethics, and Behavior (pp. 33–51 ). San Francisco: The New Lexington Press.
Roch, S. G., and Samuelson, C. D. (1997). Effects of environmental uncertainty and social value orientation in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 70, 221–235.
Roe, A. (1952). A psychologist examines sixty-four eminent scientists. Scientific American, 187, 21–25. Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (1996). Modelling intertemporal choices: An anomaly approach. Acta Psychologica, 93, 522.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values, New York: Free Press.
Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1989). Decision Traps. New York: Doubleday.
Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, I, 7–59.
Schahn, J., and Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22 (6); 767–786.
Scheffler, S. (1994). The rejection of consequentialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press (rev. edition).
Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364–371.
Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B. (1988). Decision making. In R. D. Atkinson, R. J. Hermstein, G. Lindzey and R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. Vol. 2: Learning and cognition (pp. 673–738 ). New York: Wiley.
Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269–302.
Stern, P. C., and Dietz, T. (1994). The Value Basis of Environmental Concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., and Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.
Thompson, M., and Rayner, S. (1998). Cultural discourses. In S. Rayner and E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change,Vol. 1 (pp. 265–343). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Thüring, M., and Jungermann, H. (1986). Constructing and running mental models for inferences about the future. In B. Brehmer, H. Jungermann, P. Lourens and G. Sevón (Eds.), New directions in research on decision making, (pp. 163–174 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Turner, B. L. II., Kasperson, R. E., Meyer, W. B., Dow, K., Golding, D., and et al. (1991). Two types of global environmental change: Definitional and spatial scale issues in their human dimensions. Global Environmental Change, 1, 14–22.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 22, 453458.
Van Lange, P. A., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In W. B. Liebrand, D. M. Messick and H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas. Theoretical issues and researchfinding.s (pp. 3–28 ). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Van Lenthe, J., Hendrickx, L., Vlek, C., and Biesiot, W. (1997). A decision-analytic approach to the integrated assessment of climate change. Risk Decision and Policy, 2, 213–234.
Vlek, C. A. J. (1996a). A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making and risk control. Risk Decision and Policy, 1, 9–31.
Vlek, C. A. J. (1996b). Collective risk generation and risk management: The unexploited potential of the social dilemmas paradigm. In W. B. G. Liebrand and D. M. Messick (Eds.), Frontiers in social dilemmas research (pp. 11–38 ). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Vlek, C., and Keren, G. (1992). Behavioral decision theory and environmental risk management: Assessment and resolution of four ‘survival’ dilemmas. Acta Psychologica, 80, 249–278.
Yates, J. F. (1990). Judgment and decision making, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yates, J. F. (1992). Risk-taking behavior. New York: Wiley.
Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 1–29.
Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., van der Pligt, J.. and de Vries, N. (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects ofexpected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfister, HR., Böhm, G. (2001). Decision Making in the Context of Environmental Risks. In: Allwood, C.M., Selart, M. (eds) Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9827-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9827-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5671-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9827-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive