Abstract
Each National Park Service unit in the United States produces a resource management plan (RMP) every four years or less. These plans constitute a strategic agenda for a park. Later, tactical plans commit budgets and personnel to specific projects over the planning horizon. Yet, neither planning stage incorporates much quantitative and analytical rigor and is devoid of formal decision-making tools. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) offers a structure for multi-objective decision making so that decision makers’ preferences can be formally accounted for. Preferences for each RMP project, resulting from an AHP exercise, can be used as priorities in an overall RMP. We conducted an exercise on the Olympic National Park (NP) in Washington, selecting eight projects as typical of those considered in RMPs. Five members of the park staff used the AHP to prioritise the eight projects with respect to implicit management objectives. By altering management priorities for the park, three different scenarios were generated. All three contained some similarities in rankings for the eight projects, as well as some differences. Mathematical allocations of money and people differed among these scenarios and differed substantially from what the actual 1990 RMP contains.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fox, D.G., Bernabo, J. C. and Hood, B. 1987. Guidelines for measuring the physical, chemical, and biological condition of wilderness ecosystems. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-146. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Hinds, W.T. 1984. Towards monitoring of long-term trends in terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Conservation 11: 11–18.
Johnson, K. N. 1986. FORPLAN Version 1: an overview. Land Management Planning System Section, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Johnson, K. N. and Jones, D. B. 1979. A user’s guide to Multiple Use-Sustained Yield Resource Scheduling Calculation (MUSYC). Land Management Planning System Section, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Johnson, K. N., Stuart, T. W. and Crim, S.A. 1986. FORPLAN Version 2 — an overview. Land Management Planning System Section, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Kangas, J. 1994. An approach to public participation in strategic forest planning. Forest Ecology and Management 70: 75–88.
Navon, D. I. 1971. Timber RAM:. a long-range planning method for commercial timber lands under multiple-use management. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-70.
Peterson, D. L., Schmoldt, D. L. and Silsbee, D. G. 1994. A case study of resource management planning with multiple objectives and projects. Environmental Management 18: 729–742.
Saaty, T.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 287 pp.
Schmoldt, D.L. and Peterson, D. L. 2000. Analytical group decision making in natural resources: Methodology and application. Forest Science 46: 62–75.
Schmoldt, D.L., Peterson, D. L. and Silsbee, D.G. 1994. Developing inventory and monitoring programs based on multiple objectives. Environmental Management 18: 707–727.
Silsbee, D.G. and Peterson, D.L. 1991. Designing and implementing comprehensive long- term inventory and monitoring programs for National Park System lands. Natural Resources Report NRR-91/04. National Park Service, Denver, Colorado.
Silsbee, D.G. and Peterson, D.L. 1993. Planning for implementation of resource monitoring programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 26: 177–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmoldt, D.L., Peterson, D.L. (2001). Strategic and Tactical Planning for Managing National Park Resources. In: Schmoldt, D.L., Kangas, J., Mendoza, G.A., Pesonen, M. (eds) The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5735-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9799-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive