Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Mystery of Conscience and the Turn to Language

  • Chapter
Heidegger and the Quest for the Sacred

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 44))

  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

Why Schelling, why should he enter into the forefront of Heidegger’s creative exchange with the philosophical tradition? It is incumbent for us to ask this question in the course of the present chapter. On the surface, the easiest response is that Heidegger acknowledges Schelling as an important counter thrust to the tradition through his emphasis on being over thinking.1 Indeed, Schelling describes the opposite tendency to “give priority to thought over being” as the “general affliction” of modern philosophy.2 There are two elements of Schelling’s philosophy which typify this critical orientation: 1) his appeal to nature as including a nascent tendency toward order, as we have already noted and 2) his emphasis on myth as an adjacent matrix of concern and meaning which lends further depth to philosophical inquiry. As Otto Pöggeler indicates, Schelling is the philosopher of myth par excellence.3 For Heidegger, myth will prove significant by offering the space into which thought can enter in order to be struck by what otherwise withdraws from the philosophical tradition, the grandeur of being’s mystery. If we imagine that diverse ways are hidden within the tradition, then these can unfold only by taking a detour around the rough edges of our concepts, a detour supplied by myth. As the counter pole to the logos, myth preserves the trace of heterogeneity, the differentiation of patterns, which interjects novelty into the genesis of new meaning(s).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Interestingly enough, Heidegger looked to Carl Braig as following in Schelling’s tradition of emphasizing being over thought. See Caputo, Heidegger and Aquinas, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schelling, “On the Source of Eternal Truth,” trans. Edward A. Beach, The Owl of Minerva, Vol. 22/ 1(1990): 56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pöggeler, “West-East Dialogue: Heidegger and Lao-tzu,” in Heidegger and Asian Thought, ed. Graham Parkes (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1987), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schelling, Bruno, pp. 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  5. GA 12, p. 116; tr. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Meara, “The History of Being and the History of Doctrine,” pp. 350–351.

    Google Scholar 

  7. GA 2, pp. 392–393; 342–343.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bultmann, Jesus Christ and Mythology, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  9. GA 2, p. 393; tr. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  10. GA 2, pp. 290–292; tr. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  11. GA 2, pp. 386–387; see Translators’ notes, p. 338.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GA 20, pp. 441–443; tr. 319.

    Google Scholar 

  13. GA 2, p. 53; tr. 63–64. See Heidegger’s plan for a “destruction” of the history of ontology as projected Part Two of Being and Time.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pöggeler, Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking, pp. 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  15. GA 2, pp. 354–355; tr. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael E. Zimmerman, Eclipse of the Self(Athens: Ohio University Press, 1981), pp. 25ff.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Theodore Kisiel, “Heidegger (1920–21) on Becoming a Christian: A Conceptual Picture Show,” in Reading Heidegger from the Start, p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Bultmann, Jesus Christ and Mythology, pp. 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  19. van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kisiel, The Genesis, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kovacs, The Question of God in Heidegger’s Phenomenology, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Buren, The Young Heidegger, pp. 308–309.

    Google Scholar 

  23. GA 2, pp. 379–380; tr. 331–332.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kisiel, Heidegger (1920–21) on Becoming a Christian,” p. 175. Also see John van Buren, “Martin Heidegger, Martin Luther,” in Reading Heidegger from the Start, p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Buren, The Young Heidegger, pp. 308–309.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., pp. 308–309. 27. Meister Eckhart, Sermons and Treatises, Vol. I, ed. M. D. C. Walsh (England: Element Books, 1989), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. GA 2, pp. 392–393; tr. 342–343.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Caputo, The Mystical Elements in Heidegger’s Thought, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  29. GA 2, p. 360; tr. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Kisiel, The Genesis, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ott, “Martin Heidegger’s Catholic Origins,” p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Franco Volpo, “Being and Time: A‘Translation’ of the Nicomachean Ethics?,” trans. John Protevi, in Reading Heidegger from the Start, pp. 265–266. See Gadamer’s report of Heidegger’s emphasis on alleviating the difficulty of translating phronesis by saying “‘ it’s the conscience”’ (p. 208).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heidegger, Die Metaphysikdes deutschen Idealismus (Schelling), GA 49 (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991), pp. 142ff.

    Google Scholar 

  34. GA 2, pp. 353–354; tr. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kierkegaard, “The Present Age: A Literary Review,” trans. Alexander Dru, in A Kierkegaard Anthology, ed. Robert Bretall (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946), pp. 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, pp. 342–343.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., pp. 399, 407. 39. GA 2, p. 367; tr. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kierkegaard, The Concept of Dread, trans. Walter Lowrie Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See Heidegger’s discussion ofresolve in Die Grundprobleme derPhänomenologie, GA 24 (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostrmann, 1975), pp. 406–408. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans. Albert Hofstadter (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982), p. 287.

    Google Scholar 

  40. GA 2, pp. 365–366; tr. 320.

    Google Scholar 

  41. GA 2, pp. 365–366: tr. 320.

    Google Scholar 

  42. GA 2, pp. 388–389; tr. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  43. GA 2, pp. 388–389; tr. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  44. van Buren, The Young Heidegger, p. 344.

    Google Scholar 

  45. GA 24, pp. 192–193; tr. 136–137.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Heidegger, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, GA 3 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991), pp. 155–160. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. Richard Taft (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), pp. 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  47. GA 2, p. 360; tr. 316. See Kant, The Doctrine of Virtue, trans. Mary J. Gregor (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 1957), pp. 60–62, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Volpo, “Being and Time: A‘Translation’ of the Nicomachean Ethics?,” p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Heidegger, “Anmerkungen zu Karl Jaspers Psychologie der Weltanschauungen,” in Wegmarken, GA 9 (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1976), pp. 32ff. “Comments on Karl Jaspers’s Psychology of Worldviews,” in Pathmarks, pp. 32ff. See David Farrell Krell, Intimations of Mortality (University Park: PA: The Pennsylvannia State University Press, 1986), pp. 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 52, GA 9, pp. 47ff; tr. 40ff.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, pp. 471, 477.

    Google Scholar 

  52. GA 2, p. 361 (note); tr. 317 (note).

    Google Scholar 

  53. GA 2, p. 373; tr. 326.

    Google Scholar 

  54. GA 2, pp. 379–380; tr. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  55. GA 2, pp. 3 79–3 80; tr. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  56. GA 31, pp. 296ff. See Reiner Schürmann’s ‘transcendental’ reinterpretation of Heidegger’s view of responsibility, Heidegger on Being and Acting, pp. 7–21;; 225–229. Schürmann makes the most compelling case for the practical a priori as the key to redirecting ethical inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  57. As Jacques Taminiaux also indicates, there is an “ultimate joining of phenomenon and logos” in the call of conscience which directs Dasein back to the locus of its responsivenesss as a “wanting-to-have intimate knowledge (Gewissen-haben-wollen).” See Taminiaux, “The Husserlian Heritage in Heidegger’s Notion of the Self, trans. Francois Renaud in Reading Heidegger from the Start, pp. 286–290. In pointing to a Husserlian legacy of consciousness hidden in Heidegger’s analysis of Dasein, Taminiaux argues that there is an almost too perfect coincidence in the self’s heeding the call which inhibits one’s ability to acknowledge the claim of otherness. Also see Jacques Taminiaux, Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology, trans. Michael Gendre (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 64–68. Cf. John McCumber, “Authenticity and Interaction: The Account of Communication in Being and Time,” The Thought of Martin Heidegger, Ed. Michael E. Zimmerman, Tulane Studies in Philosophy 33 (1984): 44–52. Levinas develops a further criticism in maintain that Heidegger’s ontology of the self precludes the appearance of the “face” of the other as radically singular. See E Levinas, Totality and Infinity, trans. Alphonso Lingus (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969), pp. 50–52, 194. For a response to these criticisms, see Peg Birmingham, “Logos and the Place of the Other,” Research in Phenomenology, 20 (1990): 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See Peg Birmingham, “Ever Respectfully Mine: Heidegger on Agency and Responsibility,” in Ethics and Danger, ed. A. Dallery, C. Scott, and H. Roberts (Albany: SUNY Press, 1992), pp. 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Also see Lawrence Hatab, Ethics and Finitude (Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2000), pp. 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  60. GA 2, p. 382; tr. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  61. A further appreciation of the power of logos, of our manner of co-responding to it, is necessary to make the transition from Heidegger’s analysis of conscience to developing the question of ethics as such. In this middle-voiced expression of answerability resides the clue to developing a phenomenological ethics. Such an ethic faces the special challenge of exacting a shift in questioning which can acknowledge the alterity and otherness in our response to obligations, while avoiding the tendency to subordinate ethics to ontology. See E. Levinas, Philosophical Papers, trans. Alphonso Lingus (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987), p. 52. Also see John D. Caputo, DemythologizingHeidegger (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991), pp. 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, p. 14. See Roger J. Sullivan, An Introduction to Kant ’s Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Niebhur, The Meaning of Revelation, pp. 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid., pp. 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Barth refers to Tholuck, see Barth, “An Introductory Essay” to Feuerbach’s The Essence of Christianity, p. xxi.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See Kisiel, The Genesis, pp. 339–340, 347–348, 498. From a sharper point of criticism, Jacques Derrida finds a latent onto-theo-logy at work in Heidegger’s analysis of guilt and in his attempt to develop the anticipation of death as a boundary-concept of human existence. See Derrida, Aporias, trans. Thomas Dutoit (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993), pp. 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Caputo, Demythologizing Heidegger, pp. 57ff.

    Google Scholar 

  68. See Sikka, Forms of Transcendence, p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  69. GA 2, pp. 252–253 (note); tr. 482 (note #4, Division One).

    Google Scholar 

  70. O’Meara, Romantic Idealism and.Roman Catholicism, p. 185. As O’Meara points out, Kierkegaard sometimes expressed disappointment” over Schelling’s lectures.

    Google Scholar 

  71. GA 42, p. 264; tr. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Schelling, Of Human Freedom, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  73. GA 31, p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  74. GA 65, p. 488; tr. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  75. A. Bowie, Schelling and Modern European Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 50ff.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Schelling, The Unconditional in Knowledge, trans. Fred Marti (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1980), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Schelling, System of Transcendental Idealism (1800), p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  78. See O’Meara, “The Presence of Schelling in the Third Volume of Paul Tillich’s,” Systematic Theology,” pp. 196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Schelling, Of Human Freedom, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  80. GA 65, pp. 386–388; tr. 269–270. Also see William J. Richardson, “Dasein and the Ground of Negativity: A Note on the Fourth Movement in the Beiträge-Symphony,” Heidegger Studies 9 (1993): 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schelling, System of Transcendental Idealism (1800), p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  82. GA 42, p. 270; tr. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov, p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  84. GA 42, p. 270; tr. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Schelling, Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature, pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Jean-Luc Merion, “The End of Metaphysics,” pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New Orleans, USA

    Frank Schalow

Authors
  1. Frank Schalow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schalow, F. (2001). The Mystery of Conscience and the Turn to Language. In: Heidegger and the Quest for the Sacred. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9773-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9773-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5831-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9773-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation