Advertisement

Modernisation, Solidarity and Care in Europe the Sociologist’s Tale

  • Wil Arts
  • Rudi Verburg
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 69)

Abstract

In today’s affluent Western European societies most people take full-fledged health and social care for granted. They are free from fear of the dire poverty that was for a long time the consequence of unemployment, ill health, or old age. The adequate provision of care by the welfare state has become so self-evident for them, that it has become an idée reçue. Yet newspapers report daily on the negative effects of bottlenecks in our systems of health and social care and on health and care costs that get out of hand. With almost the same frequency, ideas and policy proposals are presented that claim to provide remedies for such malfunctioning or overspending. Some plans propose only financial solutions to the problems at hand. These plans take either of two forms; on the one hand there are those who worry chiefly about the quality of care and brush aside cost objections. They want to increase the budget for care by raising taxes and levies or, by making individual co-payments compulsory. On the other hand there are those for whom increasing costs are subject to constant concern. They want to cut costs and at the same time make efficiency improvements, so that the level of care provision can be kept at the same level or even raised. Others, neither believes in the willingness of governments and people to pay more and more for health and social care, nor do they have enough faith in substantial cost reduction in combination with efficiency improvements. They deem rationing measures necessary or propose that the sick, the disabled, and the elderly queue up in anticipation of cure and care. In the face of such plans for reconstructing the existing collective risk-sharing arrangements, full-fledged health and social care provisions are in danger of losing their self-evidence.

Keywords

Welfare State Informal Care Social Care Care Provision Modernisation Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bayertz, K. (ed.): 1998, Solidarität, Begriff und Problem, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U.: 1992, Risk Society; Towards a New Modernity, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U., A. Giddens and S. Lash: 1994, Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Bonoli, G.: 1997, ‘Classifying welfare states: a two-dimension approach,’ Journal of Social Policy, 26, 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doreian, P. and Th. Fararo (eds.): 1998, The Problem of Solidarity. Theories and Models, Gordon & Breach/OPA, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Durkheim, E.: 1964 [1893], The Division of Labor in Society, The Free Press/Collier Macmillan, New York/London.Google Scholar
  7. Ferrera, M.: 1996, ‘The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe,’ Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giddens, A.: 1992, The Consequences of Modernity, The Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Ignatieff, M.: 1990, The Needs of Strangers, Hogarth Press, London.Google Scholar
  10. Leibfried, S.: 1992, ‘Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European community,’ in Z. Ferge and J.G. Kolberg (eds.), Social Policy in a changing Europe, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  11. Oorschot, W. van 1997, ‘Solidair en collectief of marktgericht en selectief? Nederlanders over sociale zekerheid,’ Beleid & Maatschappij, 162–174.Google Scholar
  12. Oorschot, W. van and A. Komter: 1998, ‘What is it that ties? Theoretical perspectives on social bond,’ Sociale Wetenschappen, 41; 5–24.Google Scholar
  13. Parsons, T.: 1951, The Social System, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  14. Philipsen, H. and F.C.J. Stevens: 1997, ‘Modernization, rationality and continuity of care: Theoretical concepts and empirical findings,’ Sociological Focus, 1, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schuyt, K.: 1998, ‘The sharing of risks and the risks of sharing: solidarity and social justice in the welfare state,’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simmel, G.: 1908, Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Form der Vergesellschaftung, Von Duncker und Humblot, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  17. Simmel, G.: 1964, The Sociology of Georg Simmel, K.H. Wolff (ed.), The Free Press/Collier Macmillan, New York/London.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, A.: 1976 [1759], The Theory of Moral Sentiments, A.L. Macfie and D.D. Raphael (eds. ), Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Streeck, W. and P.C. Schmitter: 1985, ‘Community, Market, State — and Associations?,’ European Sociological Review, 1, 119–138.Google Scholar
  20. Svallfors, S. and P. Taylor-Gooby (eds.): 1999, The End of the Welfare State? Responses to state retrenchment, Routledge/ESA Studies in European Society, London.Google Scholar
  21. Swaan, A. de: 1988, In Care of the State, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Weber, M.: 1964 [1922], The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (trans. A.M. Henderson and T. Parsons), The Free Press/Collier Macmillan, New York/London.Google Scholar
  23. Zijderveld, A.C.: 1999, The Waning of the Welfare State. The End of Comprehensive State Succor, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wil Arts
  • Rudi Verburg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations