Advertisement

Influence of Velocity on Ice-Cone Interaction

  • M. Lau
  • S. J. Jones
  • R. Phillips
  • R. F. McKenna
Conference paper
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 94)

Abstract

A series of upward breaking cone tests was conducted at NRC/IMD’s ice tank in level ice using EG/AD/S correct density model ice. Cone angles of 45° and 60° were tested. The effect of ice draft velocity in the range 0.005 to 0.5 m/s was studied for ice thicknesses ranging from 35 to 110 mm. The mean peak forces in both horizontal and vertical directions were measured and found to be almost independent of Froude Number below 0.02, but increased significantly at higher Froude Numbers. The effect of speed for upward breaking conditions was found to be less than similar conditions for downward breaking cones.

Keywords

Flexural Strength Froude Number Peak Force Bridge Pier Circumferential Crack 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkins, A.G., 1975. Icebreaker modeling, J. Ship Research, 19, 1, pp. 40–43.Google Scholar
  2. Atkins, A.G., and Y.W. Mai, 1985. Elastic and Plastic Fracture, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester.Google Scholar
  3. Barrette, P.D., Lau, M., Phillips, R., McKenna, R.F. and S.J. Jones, 2000. Interaction between level ice and conical structures: centrifuge simulations Phase II, Proc.OMAE 2000, ASME, New York, Paper # P&A 1004.Google Scholar
  4. Haynes, F.D., Sodhi, D.S., Kato, K., and K. Hirayama, 1983. Ice forces on model bridge piers, CRREL Report 83–19, U.S. Army CRREL, Hanover, N.H.Google Scholar
  5. Jones, S.J., 1993. Ice tank test procedures at the Institute for Marine Dynamics, Laboratory Memorandum LM-AVR-20, NRC/IMD, St. John’s, Newfoundland.Google Scholar
  6. Lau, M., Jones, S.J., Tucker, J.R., and D.B. Muggeridge, 1993. Model ice ridge forces on a multifaceted cone, Proc. POAC 93, Vol. 2, Hamburg, pp. 537–546.Google Scholar
  7. Lau, M., and F.M. Williams, 1991. Model ice forces on a downward breaking cone, Proc. POAC 91, Vol. 1, St. John’s, Newfoundland, pp. 167–184.Google Scholar
  8. Lau, M., Muggeridge, D.B., and F.M. Williams, 1988. Model tests of fixed and free floating downward breaking cones in ice. Proc. OMAE 88, ASME, New York, pp. 239–247.Google Scholar
  9. Lau, M., Molgaard, J., Williams, F.M., and A.S.J. Swamidas, 1999. An analysis of ice breaking pattern and ice piece size around sloping structures, Proc. OMAE 99, ASME, New York, Paper # 1151.Google Scholar
  10. Maattanen, M., 1986. Ice sheet failure against an inclined wall, Proc. 8 th IAHR Ice Symp., Vol. 1, Iowa City, pp. 149–158.Google Scholar
  11. Sodhi, D.S., 1987. Dynamic analysis of failure modes on ice sheets encountering sloping structures, Proc. OMAE 87, Vol. 4, ASME, New York, pp. 281–284.Google Scholar
  12. Spencer, D., McKenna, R., and Lau, M., 1993. Ice model tests of a 60° upward breaking bridge pier for the Northumberland Strait Crossing, NRC/IMD Report TR-1993–05, St. John’s.Google Scholar
  13. Spencer, D.S. and G.W. Timco, 1990. CD model ice — A process to produce correct density (CD) model ice, Proc.10 th International IAHR Symp. on Ice, Vol. 2, Espoo, Finland, pp. 745–755.Google Scholar
  14. Timco, G.W., 1986. EG/AD/S: a new type of model ice for refrigerated towing tanks, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 12, pp. 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wessels, E., 1984. Model test investigation of ice forces on fixed and floating conical structures, Proc. 7 th International IAHR Symp. on Ice, Vol. 3, Hamburg, pp. 203–220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Lau
    • 1
  • S. J. Jones
    • 2
  • R. Phillips
    • 1
  • R. F. McKenna
    • 1
  1. 1.C-COREMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.In stitute for Marine DynamicsNational Research Council of CanadaSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations